Suppr超能文献

接种疫苗可预防新冠病毒检测呈阳性患者的重症肺部疾病:一项病例对照研究。

Vaccination Can Prevent Severe Pulmonary Disease in COVID-19 Positive Patients: A Case-Control Study.

作者信息

Ravichandran Sreesupria, Vijayakumar Keerthika, G V Vishwajit, P M Siva

机构信息

Community Medicine, Government ESIC Medical College, Coimbatore, IND.

Community Medicine, Coimbatore Medical College, Coimbatore, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Sep 20;15(9):e45638. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45638. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic was a global health emergency, which brought lives to a standstill. To combat this deadly virus, two vaccines were deployed widely: COVISHIELD (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) and COVAXIN (BBV152). These were approved based on the immunological response they elicit in standardized conditions; however, the real-life scenario after deployment was completely different. Only in such situations can the true effectiveness of vaccines be assessed. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness (VE) of COVAXIN/COVISHIELD in preventing severe pulmonary disease in RT-PCR-positive COVID-19 patients greater than 18 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A case-control study was conducted among 260 subjects aged above 18 years, positive for COVID-19 through RT-PCR. 130 cases and 130 controls were enrolled. Radiological findings were obtained and subjects with >50% lung involvement were considered as cases. Subjects were interviewed about their vaccination status. Odds ratio was calculated, and the adjusted odds ratio was estimated for vaccine effectiveness, using the formula (1-adjusted ODDS ratio)*100.

RESULTS

The vaccine effectiveness for a single dose of vaccine was 55.2% (95% C.I. 11.0%-77.5%) and with two doses was 98.0% (95% C.I. 85.0%-99.7%). Hence two doses are highly effective than a single dose of vaccine in reducing lung involvement.

CONCLUSION

Two doses of vaccine are more effective than a single dose vaccine in reducing lung involvement. Since sporadic cases of COVID-19 still persist, it is important to emphasize the role of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 infections, particularly in the elderly and those with comorbidities.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情是一场全球卫生紧急事件,使生活陷入停滞。为对抗这种致命病毒,两种疫苗被广泛应用:牛津阿斯利康新冠疫苗(ChAdOx1 nCoV-19)和印度巴拉特生物技术公司的新冠疫苗(BBV152)。这些疫苗是基于它们在标准化条件下引发的免疫反应而获批的;然而,疫苗接种后的实际情况却截然不同。只有在这种情况下才能评估疫苗的真正有效性。主要目的是评估印度巴拉特生物技术公司的新冠疫苗/牛津阿斯利康新冠疫苗在预防18岁以上RT-PCR检测呈阳性的新冠患者出现严重肺部疾病方面的有效性(疫苗效力)。

材料与方法

对260名18岁以上通过RT-PCR检测确诊为新冠阳性的受试者进行了一项病例对照研究。纳入了130例病例和130例对照。获取了放射学检查结果,肺部受累超过50%的受试者被视为病例。就受试者的疫苗接种状况进行了访谈。计算比值比,并使用公式(1 - 调整后的比值比)×100估算疫苗效力的调整后比值比。

结果

单剂疫苗的疫苗效力为55.2%(95%置信区间11.0% - 77.5%),两剂疫苗的效力为98.0%(95%置信区间85.0% - 99.7%)。因此,两剂疫苗在减少肺部受累方面比单剂疫苗高效得多。

结论

两剂疫苗在减少肺部受累方面比单剂疫苗更有效。由于新冠散发病例仍然存在,强调疫苗接种在预防严重新冠感染中的作用非常重要,特别是对于老年人和患有合并症的人。

相似文献

6
Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review.灭活疫苗Covaxin/BBV152:一项系统评价。
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 9;13:863162. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.863162. eCollection 2022.
7
Covid-19 Vaccines Available in India.印度有新冠疫苗。
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2022;25(14):2391-2397. doi: 10.2174/1386207325666220315115953.

本文引用的文献

2
Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review.灭活疫苗Covaxin/BBV152:一项系统评价。
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 9;13:863162. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.863162. eCollection 2022.
4
COVID-19 and vulnerable populations.COVID-19 与弱势群体。
J Community Psychol. 2022 Aug;50(6):2537-2541. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22880. Epub 2022 May 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验