Department of Community Medicine, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, India.
Academic Research Development Unit, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 25;12(2):e055403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055403.
Association of educational status, as marker of socioeconomic status, with COVID-19 outcomes has not been well studied. We performed a hospital-based cross-sectional study to determine its association with outcomes.
Successive patients of COVID-19 presenting at government hospital were recruited. Demographic and clinical details were obtained at admission, and in-hospital outcomes were assessed. Cohort was classified according to self-reported educational status into group 1: illiterate or ≤primary; group 2: higher secondary; and group 3: some college. To compare intergroup outcomes, we performed logistic regression.
4645 patients (men 3386, women 1259) with confirmed COVID-19 were recruited. Mean age was 46±18 years, most lived in large households and 30.5% had low educational status. Smoking or tobacco use was in 29.5%, comorbidities in 28.6% and low oxygen concentration (SpO <95%) at admission in 30%. Average length of hospital stay was 6.8±3.7 days, supplemental oxygen was provided in 18.4%, high flow oxygen or non-invasive ventilation 7.1% and mechanical ventilation 3.6%, 340 patients (7.3%) died. Group 1 patients had more tobacco use, hypoxia at admission, lymphocytopaenia, and liver and kidney dysfunction. In group 1 versus groups 2 and 3, requirement of oxygen (21.6% vs 16.7% and 17.0%), non-invasive ventilation (8.0% vs 5.9% and 7.1%), invasive ventilation (4.6% vs 3.5% and 3.1%) and deaths (10.0% vs 6.8% and 5.5%) were significantly greater (p<0.05). OR for deaths were higher in group 1 (1.91, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.51) and group 2 (1.24, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.66) compared with group 3. Adjustment for demographic and comorbidities led to some attenuation in groups 1 (1.44, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.93) and 2 (1.38, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.85); this persisted with adjustments for clinical parameters and oxygen support in groups 1 (1.38, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.93) and 2 (1.52, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.11).
Low educational status patients with COVID-19 in India have significantly greater adverse in-hospital outcomes and mortality.
REF/2020/06/034036.
教育程度作为社会经济地位的标志,与 COVID-19 结局的关联尚未得到很好的研究。我们进行了一项基于医院的横断面研究,以确定其与结局的关系。
连续招募在政府医院就诊的 COVID-19 患者。入院时获取人口统计学和临床详细信息,并评估住院期间的结局。根据自我报告的教育程度,将队列分为 3 组:1 组:文盲或小学及以下;2 组:中学及以上;3 组:大专及以上。为了比较组间结局,我们进行了逻辑回归分析。
共纳入 4645 例(男性 3386 例,女性 1259 例)确诊 COVID-19 患者。平均年龄为 46±18 岁,大多数患者居住在大家庭中,30.5%的患者教育程度较低。29.5%的患者吸烟或使用烟草,28.6%的患者合并症,30%的患者入院时血氧浓度(SpO<95%)低。平均住院时间为 6.8±3.7 天,18.4%的患者需要吸氧,7.1%的患者需要高流量氧或无创通气,3.6%的患者需要机械通气,340 例(7.3%)患者死亡。1 组患者吸烟、入院时缺氧、淋巴细胞减少、肝肾功能障碍更为常见。与 2 组和 3 组相比,1 组患者需要吸氧(21.6%比 16.7%和 17.0%)、无创通气(8.0%比 5.9%和 7.1%)、有创通气(4.6%比 3.5%和 3.1%)和死亡(10.0%比 6.8%和 5.5%)的比例明显更高(p<0.05)。与 3 组相比,1 组(1.91,95%CI 1.46 至 2.51)和 2 组(1.24,95%CI 0.93 至 1.66)的死亡比值比更高。调整人口统计学和合并症后,1 组(1.44,95%CI 1.07 至 1.93)和 2 组(1.38,95%CI 1.02 至 1.85)的比值比有所降低;在调整临床参数和氧支持后,1 组(1.38,95%CI 0.99 至 1.93)和 2 组(1.52,95%CI 1.01 至 2.11)的比值比仍然存在。
印度 COVID-19 低教育程度患者住院期间不良结局和死亡率显著更高。
REF/2020/06/034036。