Suppr超能文献

膝关节置换术患者关节周围注射地塞米松和布比卡因联合收肌管阻滞与单纯收肌管阻滞的疗效比较:一项回顾性病例对照研究

Efficacy of Periarticular Infiltration with Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine plus Adductor Canal Block Relative to That of Adductor Canal Block Alone for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Matched Study.

作者信息

Yuenyongviwat Varah, Wuttiworawanit Bunyaporn, Panichnantho Nipat, Hongnaparak Theerawit, Iamthanaporn Khanin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

出版信息

Adv Orthop. 2023 Oct 12;2023:7356192. doi: 10.1155/2023/7356192. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Periarticular infiltration (PI) is a common procedure during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for postoperative pain management. This retrospective, case-matched study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PI with dexamethasone and bupivacaine in combination with an adductor canal block (ACB) and compare it with that of ACB alone in reducing postoperative pain in patients with TKA.

METHODS

Data were collected from 66 patients who underwent TKA performed by a single surgeon. Thirty-three of them received ACB + PI, and 33 received ACB alone. However, both groups underwent identical surgical techniques and postoperative care protocols. The pain scores and fentanyl consumption of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The ACB + PI group had significantly lower pain scores than the ACB alone group at 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively (=0.033, 0.004, 0.038, and 0.049, respectively). The percentage of patients requiring fentanyl as a rescue medication was significantly higher for the ACB alone group (90.9%) than for the ACB + PI group (69.7%, =0.03). The total fentanyl consumption was also lower for the ACB + PI group ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The periarticular injection of the combination of dexamethasone and bupivacaine plus ACB was more effective than ACB alone in reducing postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption in patients undergoing TKA. Further studies comparing different doses of dexamethasone or other cocktail regimens may provide additional insights into this approach.

摘要

目的

关节周围浸润(PI)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)中用于术后疼痛管理的常见操作。这项回顾性病例对照研究旨在评估地塞米松和布比卡因联合收肌管阻滞(ACB)进行PI的有效性,并将其与单纯ACB在减轻TKA患者术后疼痛方面的效果进行比较。

方法

收集了由一名外科医生实施TKA的66例患者的数据。其中33例接受ACB + PI,33例仅接受ACB。然而,两组均采用相同的手术技术和术后护理方案。比较两组的疼痛评分和芬太尼用量。

结果

ACB + PI组在术后8、16、24和48小时的疼痛评分显著低于单纯ACB组(分别为=0.033、0.004、0.038和0.049)。单纯ACB组需要芬太尼作为急救药物的患者百分比(90.9%)显著高于ACB + PI组(69.7%,=0.03)。ACB + PI组的芬太尼总用量也较低(<0.001)。

结论

地塞米松和布比卡因联合ACB进行关节周围注射在减轻TKA患者术后疼痛和芬太尼用量方面比单纯ACB更有效。进一步比较不同剂量地塞米松或其他联合用药方案的研究可能会为这种方法提供更多见解。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Management of perioperative pain after TKA.全膝关节置换术后围手术期疼痛管理。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Feb;109(1S):103443. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103443. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验