• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎盘植入谱系的定量分析框架:基于磁共振成像-解剖学-临床特征的胎盘亚型、术中出血及子宫切除术风险评估

A quantitative analysis framework of placenta accreta spectrum: placenta subtype, intraoperative bleeding, and hysterectomy risk evaluation based on magnetic resonance imaging-anatomical-clinical features.

作者信息

Yang Huancheng, Wu Xiang, Liu Weihao, Yuan Yangguang, Zeng Haoyang, Li Junkai, Ye Baiwei, Wang Lei, Luo Shimei, Li Zhe, Liu Hanlin

机构信息

Department of Luohu Clinical Institute, Shantou University, Shantou, China.

Department of Medical College, Shantou University, Shantou, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):7105-7116. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-142. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

DOI:10.21037/qims-23-142
PMID:37869322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10585581/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to develop a quantitative analysis framework utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-anatomical-clinical features to predict 3 clinically significant parameters in patients with PAS: placenta subtype (invasive . non-invasive placenta), intraoperative bleeding (≥1,500 . <1,500 mL), and hysterectomy risk (hysterectomy . non-hysterectomy).

METHODS

A total of 125 pregnant women with PAS from 2 medical centers were enrolled into an internal training set and an external testing set. Some 21 MRI-anatomical-clinical features were integrated as input into the framework. The proposed quantitative analytic framework contains mainly 3 classifiers built by extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and their testing in external datasets. We also further compared the accuracy of placenta subtype prediction between the proposed model and 4 radiologists. A quantitative model interpretation method called SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was conducted to explore the contribution of each feature.

RESULTS

The placenta subtype (invasive . non-invasive), intraoperative bleeding (≥1,500 . <1,500 mL), and hysterectomy risk (hysterectomy . non-hysterectomy) demonstrated impressive area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values of 0.93, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, in the internal validation set. Even in the external testing set, these metrics maintained their strength, achieving AUROC values of 0.91, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively. Comparing our proposed framework to the 4 radiologists, our model exhibited superior accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity in predicting placental subtypes within the external testing cohort. The features associated with intraplacental dark T2 bands played a crucial role in the decision-making process of all 3 prediction models.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative analysis framework can provide a robust method for classification of placenta subtype (invasive . non-invasive placenta), intraoperative bleeding (≥1,500 . <1,500 mL), and hysterectomy risk (hysterectomy . non-hysterectomy) based on MRI-anatomical-clinical features in PAS.

摘要

背景

胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)是导致孕产妇发病和死亡的重要原因。我们的目标是开发一种利用磁共振成像(MRI)解剖学 - 临床特征的定量分析框架,以预测PAS患者的3个临床重要参数:胎盘亚型(侵入性. 非侵入性胎盘)、术中出血量(≥1500. <1500 mL)和子宫切除风险(子宫切除. 非子宫切除)。

方法

来自2个医疗中心的125例患有PAS的孕妇被纳入内部训练集和外部测试集。约21个MRI解剖学 - 临床特征被整合作为框架的输入。所提出的定量分析框架主要包含由极端梯度提升(XGBoost)构建的3个分类器及其在外部数据集中的测试。我们还进一步比较了所提出模型与4名放射科医生在胎盘亚型预测方面的准确性。采用一种称为SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)的定量模型解释方法来探索每个特征的贡献。

结果

在内部验证集中,胎盘亚型(侵入性. 非侵入性)、术中出血量(≥1500. <1500 mL)和子宫切除风险(子宫切除. 非子宫切除)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)值分别令人印象深刻,为0.93、0.88和0.90。即使在外部测试集中,这些指标也保持了其优势,AUROC值分别为0.91、0.82和0.82。将我们提出的框架与4名放射科医生进行比较,我们的模型在外部测试队列中预测胎盘亚型时表现出更高的准确性、特异性和敏感性。与胎盘内暗T2带相关的特征在所有3个预测模型的决策过程中都起着关键作用。

结论

该定量分析框架可以提供一种基于PAS的MRI解剖学 - 临床特征对胎盘亚型(侵入性. 非侵入性胎盘)、术中出血量(≥1500. <1500 mL)和子宫切除风险(子宫切除. 非子宫切除)进行分类的可靠方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/4d74e81c8e11/qims-13-10-7105-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/25f5ab63e845/qims-13-10-7105-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/54997a4d0e57/qims-13-10-7105-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/27f2eb7ac95b/qims-13-10-7105-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/4d74e81c8e11/qims-13-10-7105-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/25f5ab63e845/qims-13-10-7105-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/54997a4d0e57/qims-13-10-7105-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/27f2eb7ac95b/qims-13-10-7105-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1125/10585581/4d74e81c8e11/qims-13-10-7105-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
A quantitative analysis framework of placenta accreta spectrum: placenta subtype, intraoperative bleeding, and hysterectomy risk evaluation based on magnetic resonance imaging-anatomical-clinical features.胎盘植入谱系的定量分析框架:基于磁共振成像-解剖学-临床特征的胎盘亚型、术中出血及子宫切除术风险评估
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):7105-7116. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-142. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
2
MRI prognosticators for adverse maternal and neonatal clinical outcome in patients at high risk for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.MRI 预测指标在胎盘部位滋养细胞疾病谱(PAS)高危患者中对母婴不良临床结局的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Aug;50(2):602-618. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26592. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
3
Development and validation of MRI-based scoring models for predicting placental invasiveness in high-risk women for placenta accreta spectrum.基于 MRI 的评分模型的开发和验证,用于预测胎盘植入疾病谱高危人群的胎盘侵袭性。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Feb;34(2):957-969. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10058-8. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
[Risk factor assessment and adverse outcome prediction of placenta accreta in pregnant women after cesarean section complicated with placenta previa: a national multicenter retrospective study].剖宫产术后合并前置胎盘孕妇胎盘植入的危险因素评估及不良结局预测:一项全国多中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 25;58(1):26-36. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20221009-00615.
5
The maximum length of T2-dark intraplacental bands may help predict intraoperative haemorrhage in pregnant women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).T2 暗黑型胎盘内带的最大长度可能有助于预测胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)孕妇术中出血。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Oct;47(10):3594-3603. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03619-w. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
Prenatal planning of placenta previa: diagnostic accuracy of a novel MRI-based prediction model for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and clinical outcome.胎盘前置的产前规划:一种新型 MRI 胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)预测模型的诊断准确性及其临床结局。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 May;44(5):1873-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1882-8.
7
Intraplacental Fetal Vessel Diameter May Help Predict for Placental Invasiveness in Pregnant Women at High Risk for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.胎盘内胎儿血管直径可能有助于预测胎盘侵入性在胎盘植入谱系疾病高危孕妇中的作用。
Radiology. 2021 Feb;298(2):403-412. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200273. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
Deep Learning Radiomic Analysis of MRI Combined with Clinical Characteristics Diagnoses Placenta Accreta Spectrum and its Subtypes.深度学习 MRI 放射组学分析联合临床特征诊断胎盘植入谱系及其亚型。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Dec;60(6):2705-2715. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29317. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
9
Intraplacental T2-hypointense bands may help predict placental invasion depth and postpartum hemorrhage in placenta accrete spectrum disorders in high-risk gravid patients.胎盘内 T2 低信号带有助于预测高危妊娠患者胎盘植入谱系疾病的胎盘侵犯深度和产后出血。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Dec;94:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
10
Diffusion MRI Based Myometrium Tractography for Detection of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder.基于弥散磁共振成像的子宫肌层追踪技术在胎盘植入谱系疾病检测中的应用。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jan;55(1):255-264. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27794. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Automatic analysis framework based on 3D-CT multi-scale features for accurate prediction of Ki67 expression levels in substantial renal cell carcinoma.基于3D-CT多尺度特征的自动分析框架用于准确预测肾实质细胞癌中Ki67表达水平
Insights Imaging. 2023 Jul 19;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01465-y.
2
An automated surgical decision-making framework for partial or radical nephrectomy based on 3D-CT multi-level anatomical features in renal cell carcinoma.基于 3D-CT 多层解剖特征的肾癌部分或根治性肾切除术的自动手术决策框架。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):7532-7541. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09812-9. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis for Intraoperative Risk Assessment in Gravid Patients at High Risk with Placenta Accreta Spectrum.
基于MRI的影像组学分析用于胎盘植入谱系高危妊娠患者的术中风险评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 14;12(2):485. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020485.
4
Trends, characteristics, and outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum: a national study in the United States.胎盘植入谱系疾病的趋势、特征和结局:美国全国性研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):534.e1-534.e38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.233. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees.利用可解释人工智能实现从局部解释到树木的全局理解
Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Assessment of the massive hemorrhage in placenta accreta spectrum with magnetic resonance imaging.磁共振成像评估胎盘植入谱系疾病中的大出血情况。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Mar;19(3):2367-2376. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8457. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
7
Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) joint consensus statement for MR imaging of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) 和 European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) 联合发布的胎盘植入谱系疾病磁共振成像共识声明。
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2604-2615. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06617-7. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.国际乳腺癌筛查人工智能系统评估。
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):89-94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
9
Radiomics analysis of placenta on T2WI facilitates prediction of postpartum haemorrhage: A multicentre study.胎盘 T2WI 纹理分析有助于预测产后出血:一项多中心研究。
EBioMedicine. 2019 Dec;50:355-365. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.010. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
10
Risk scoring system with MRI for intraoperative massive hemorrhage in placenta previa and accreta.用于前置胎盘和胎盘植入术中大出血的MRI风险评分系统。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Mar;51(3):947-958. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26922. Epub 2019 Sep 11.