• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The role of beta-blocker drugs in critically ill patients: a SIAARTI expert consensus statement.β受体阻滞剂药物在重症患者中的作用:SIAARTI专家共识声明
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2023 Oct 23;3(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s44158-023-00126-2.
2
Management of analgosedation during noninvasive respiratory support: an expert Delphi consensus document developed by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).无创呼吸支持期间的镇痛镇静管理:由意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏与重症监护学会(SIAARTI)制定的专家德尔菲共识文件
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Sep 30;4(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00203-0.
3
Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care expert consensus statement on the use of lung ultrasound in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (ITACO).意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏与重症监护学会关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)重症患者肺部超声应用的专家共识声明(ITACO)。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2021 Nov 24;1(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s44158-021-00015-6.
4
Timing of surgery and elective perioperative management of patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection: a SIAARTI expert consensus statement.既往感染过严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)患者的手术时机及围手术期选择性管理:意大利传染病学会(SIAARTI)专家共识声明
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 Jun 22;2(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00058-3.
5
The prevention of pressure injuries in the positioning and mobilization of patients in the ICU: a good clinical practice document by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).重症监护病房患者体位摆放与活动中的压疮预防:意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏与重症监护学会(SIAARTI)的良好临床实践文件
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 Jan 31;2(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00035-w.
6
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
7
Beta-blocker treatment in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis.危重症患者的β受体阻滞剂治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1994-2010. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2098376.
8
Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine.危重症成年患者皮质类固醇功能不全的诊断与管理建议:美国危重病医学会国际特别工作组的共识声明
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1937-49. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817603ba.
9
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
10
[A Chinese consensus statement on the clinical application of transesophageal echocardiography for critical care (2019)].《经食管超声心动图在重症监护中的临床应用中国专家共识(2019年版)》
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 1;58(12):869-882. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2019.12.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Beta-Blockers and mortality in patients with malignancy and cardiovascular disease: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.β受体阻滞剂与恶性肿瘤合并心血管疾病患者的死亡率:MIMIC-IV数据库分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):1351. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14745-1.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of Landiolol and Esmolol in critically ill patients: a propensity score-matched study.兰地洛尔与艾司洛尔在重症患者中的疗效及安全性比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Jan 12;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01418-8.
3
Beta-Blockers as an Immunologic and Autonomic Manipulator in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of the Recent Literature.β受体阻滞剂在危重症患者中的免疫调节和自主神经调控作用:文献复习。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 24;25(15):8058. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158058.

本文引用的文献

1
Beta-blockers in cardiac arrhythmias-Clinical pharmacologist's point of view.β受体阻滞剂在心律失常中的应用——临床药理学家的观点
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1043714. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1043714. eCollection 2022.
2
β-Blockade before Noncardiac Surgery: The Devil Is in the Details.非心脏手术前的β受体阻滞剂治疗:细节决定成败。
Anesthesiology. 2023 Jan 1;138(1):7-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004441.
3
Preoperative β-Blocker Therapy and Stroke or Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.术前β受体阻滞剂治疗与大型腹部手术中的卒中和主要不良心脏事件:一项回顾性队列研究。
Anesthesiology. 2023 Jan 1;138(1):42-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004404.
4
Beta-blocker treatment in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis.危重症患者的β受体阻滞剂治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1994-2010. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2098376.
5
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
6
Treatment strategies for new onset atrial fibrillation in patients treated on an intensive care unit: a systematic scoping review.重症监护病房中新发心房颤动患者的治疗策略:系统范围综述。
Crit Care. 2021 Jul 21;25(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03684-5.
7
Cyclic GMP modulating drugs in cardiovascular diseases: mechanism-based network pharmacology.环鸟苷酸调节药物在心血管疾病中的作用:基于机制的网络药理学。
Cardiovasc Res. 2022 Jul 20;118(9):2085-2102. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab240.
8
β1-blocker in sepsis.脓毒症中的β1受体阻滞剂
J Intensive Care. 2021 May 8;9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00552-w.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Heart Rate Control Medications for the Treatment of Sepsis-Associated Atrial Fibrillation.心率控制药物治疗脓毒症相关性心房颤动的疗效比较。
Chest. 2021 Apr;159(4):1452-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.049. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

β受体阻滞剂药物在重症患者中的作用:SIAARTI专家共识声明

The role of beta-blocker drugs in critically ill patients: a SIAARTI expert consensus statement.

作者信息

Guarracino Fabio, Cortegiani Andrea, Antonelli Massimo, Behr Astrid, Biancofiore Giandomenico, Del Gaudio Alfredo, Forfori Francesco, Galdieri Nicola, Grasselli Giacomo, Paternoster Gianluca, Rocco Monica, Romagnoli Stefano, Sardo Salvatore, Treskatsch Sascha, Tripodi Vincenzo Francesco, Tritapepe Luigi

机构信息

Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Anesthesia and Resuscitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.

Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2023 Oct 23;3(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s44158-023-00126-2.

DOI:10.1186/s44158-023-00126-2
PMID:37872608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10591347/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of β-blockers in the critically ill has been studied, and data on the protective effects of these drugs on critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature over the last two decades. However, consensus and guidelines by scientific societies on the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients are still lacking. The purpose of this document is to support the clinical decision-making process regarding the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients. The recipients of this document are physicians, nurses, healthcare personnel, and other professionals involved in the patient's care process.

METHODS

The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects underlying the use of β-blockers in critically ill adult patients. The methodology followed by the experts during this process was in line with principles of modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales in the form of informative text. The overall list of statements was subjected to blind votes for consensus.

RESULTS

The literature search suggests that adrenergic stress and increased heart rate in critically ill patients are associated with organ dysfunction and increased mortality. Heart rate control thus seems to be critical in the management of the critically ill patient, requiring careful clinical evaluation aimed at both the differential diagnosis to treat secondary tachycardia and the treatment of rhythm disturbance. In addition, the use of β-blockers for the treatment of persistent tachycardia may be considered in patients with septic shock once hypovolemia has been ruled out. Intravenous application should be the preferred route of administration.

CONCLUSION

β-blockers protective effects in critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature. Their use in the acute treatment of increased heart rate requires understanding of the pathophysiology and careful differential diagnosis, as all causes of tachycardia should be ruled out and addressed first.

摘要

背景

β受体阻滞剂在危重症患者中的作用已得到研究,在过去二十年里,关于这些药物对危重症患者保护作用的数据在文献中被反复报道。然而,科学协会对于在危重症患者中使用β受体阻滞剂仍缺乏共识和指南。本文的目的是支持关于在危重症患者中使用β受体阻滞剂的临床决策过程。本文的受众是医生、护士、医护人员以及参与患者护理过程的其他专业人员。

方法

意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏与重症监护学会(SIAARTI)挑选了一组专家,要求他们确定在成年危重症患者中使用β受体阻滞剂的关键要点。在此过程中专家们遵循的方法符合改良德尔菲法和兰德-加州大学洛杉矶分校法的原则。专家们以信息性文本的形式制定声明和支持理由。声明的总体列表进行了无记名投票以达成共识。

结果

文献检索表明,危重症患者的肾上腺素能应激和心率增加与器官功能障碍及死亡率增加相关。因此,心率控制在危重症患者的管理中似乎至关重要,这需要进行仔细的临床评估,既要针对继发性心动过速进行鉴别诊断,也要治疗心律失常。此外,一旦排除低血容量,对于感染性休克患者,可考虑使用β受体阻滞剂治疗持续性心动过速。静脉给药应作为首选给药途径。

结论

β受体阻滞剂对危重症患者的保护作用在文献中已被反复报道。在急性心率增加的治疗中使用β受体阻滞剂需要了解病理生理学并进行仔细的鉴别诊断,因为应首先排除并处理所有心动过速的原因。