Suppr超能文献

关节内注射皮质类固醇、透明质酸、富血小板血浆和安慰剂治疗拇指基底骨关节炎的比较:频率学派网状Meta分析

Comparison between intra-articular injections of corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, PRP and placebo for thumb base osteoarthritis: A frequentist network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Thakker Arjuna, Sharma Sanjeev C, Johnson Nick, Dias Joseph J

机构信息

Academic Team of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2023 Oct 11;45:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.09.017. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Current evidence for the use of intra-articular injections for thumb base osteoarthritis (TBOA) is equivocal. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of intra-articular corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma.

METHODS

A Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted comparing outcomes at short (≤3 months) and medium-term (>3-12 months) time points.

RESULTS

Data from 7 RCTs and 1 non-RCT (446 patients) were collected, consisting of corticosteroids (n = 7), hyaluronic acid (n = 7), platelet-rich plasma (n = 2) and placebo (n = 2). At the short-term time point, no intra-articular injection demonstrated superiority over placebo at reducing pain. At the medium-term time point, superiority of platelet-rich plasma at reducing pain over placebo and corticosteroids was seen following sensitivity analysis (RCTs only) (SMD -1.48 95 % CI -2.71; -0.25). No injection proved superior at improving function at short or medium-term time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, despite the promising result for platelet-rich plasma, the evidence quality was limited to two studies only justifying the need for further and larger methodologically robust trials investigating corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma vs each other and placebo.

摘要

背景与目的

目前关于拇指基底骨关节炎(TBOA)使用关节内注射治疗的证据尚不明确。本研究旨在探究关节内注射皮质类固醇、透明质酸和富血小板血浆的疗效。

方法

进行了一项频率学派网状Meta分析,比较短期(≤3个月)和中期(>3 - 12个月)时间点的结果。

结果

收集了7项随机对照试验(RCT)和1项非随机对照试验的数据(446例患者),包括皮质类固醇(n = 7)、透明质酸(n = 7)、富血小板血浆(n = 2)和安慰剂(n = 2)。在短期时间点,没有关节内注射在减轻疼痛方面显示出优于安慰剂。在中期时间点,敏感性分析(仅RCT)显示富血小板血浆在减轻疼痛方面优于安慰剂和皮质类固醇(标准化均值差 -1.48,95%可信区间 -2.71;-0.25)。在短期或中期时间点,没有注射在改善功能方面被证明更优越。

结论

总体而言,尽管富血小板血浆有令人鼓舞的结果,但证据质量仅限于两项研究,这仅证明有必要进行进一步的、更大规模的、方法学上更严谨的试验,以相互比较皮质类固醇、透明质酸和富血小板血浆以及与安慰剂的疗效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验