机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与手术时间的学习曲线相关,但与组件对线、肢体对线和间隙平衡无关。

Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with a learning curve for surgical time but not for component alignment, limb alignment and gap balancing.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Gent, Belgium.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, AZ Delta Roeselare, Brugsesteenweg 90, 8800, Roeselare, Belgium.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06341-6. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The application of robotics in the operating theatre for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. As with all new technology, the introduction of new systems is associated with a learning curve and potentially associated with extra complications. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify and predict the learning curve of robot-assisted (RA) TKA.

METHODS

A RA TKA system (MAKO) was introduced in April 2018 in our service. A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients receiving a TKA with this system by six surgeons. Operative times, implant and limb alignment, intraoperative joint balance and robot-related complications were evaluated. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analyses were used to assess learning curves for operative time, implant alignment and joint balance in RA TKA. Linear regression was performed to predict the learning curve of each surgeon.

RESULTS

RA TKA was associated with a learning curve of 11-43 cases for operative time (p < 0.001). This learning curve was significantly affected by the surgical profile (high vs. medium vs. low volume). A complete normalisation of operative times was seen in four out of five surgeons. The precision of implant positioning and gap balancing showed no learning curve. An average deviation of 0.2° (SD 1.4), 0.7° (SD 1.1), 1.2 (SD 2.1), 0.2° (SD 2.9) and 0.3 (SD 2.4) for the mLDFA, MPTA, HKA, PDFA and PPTA from the preoperative plan was observed. Limb alignment showed a mean deviation of 1.2° (SD 2.1) towards valgus postoperatively compared to the intraoperative plan. One tibial stress fracture was seen as a complication due to suboptimal positioning of the registration pins.

CONCLUSION

RA TKA is associated with a learning curve for surgical time, which might be longer than reported in current literature and dependent on the profile of the surgeon. There is no learning curve for component alignment, limb alignment and gap balancing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

目的

机器人在全膝关节置换术(TKA)手术室中的应用仍然存在争议。与所有新技术一样,新系统的引入伴随着学习曲线,并且可能会带来额外的并发症。因此,本研究旨在确定和预测机器人辅助(RA)TKA 的学习曲线。

方法

我们的服务于 2018 年 4 月引入了一种 RA TKA 系统(MAKO)。对六名外科医生为接受该系统治疗的所有 TKA 患者进行了回顾性分析。评估了手术时间、植入物和肢体对线、术中关节平衡以及与机器人相关的并发症。使用累积和(CUSUM)分析评估 RA TKA 手术时间、植入物对线和关节平衡的学习曲线。进行线性回归以预测每位外科医生的学习曲线。

结果

RA TKA 的手术时间学习曲线为 11-43 例(p<0.001)。该学习曲线受手术类型(高、中、低容量)显著影响。五名外科医生中有四名的手术时间完全正常化。植入物定位和间隙平衡的精度没有学习曲线。mLDFA、MPTA、HKA、PDFA 和 PPTA 的平均偏差分别为 0.2°(SD 1.4)、0.7°(SD 1.1)、1.2°(SD 2.1)、0.2°(SD 2.9)和 0.3°(SD 2.4)与术前计划相比,术后下肢对线呈外翻趋势,平均偏差为 1.2°(SD 2.1)。由于注册针定位不当,出现 1 例胫骨应力性骨折并发症。

结论

RA TKA 的手术时间学习曲线与文献报道的相比可能更长,且取决于外科医生的类型。组件对线、下肢对线和间隙平衡没有学习曲线。

证据水平

IV 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索