• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助全膝关节置换术有 16 例的学习曲线,手术时间延长 12 分钟。

Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of 16 cases and increased operative time of 12 min.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences (FMHS), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Waitematā DHB, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2022 Nov;92(11):2974-2979. doi: 10.1111/ans.17975. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1111/ans.17975
PMID:36398352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9804534/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic-arm assisted systems are increasingly used for knee arthroplasty, however introduction of new systems can involve a learning curve. We aimed to define the learning curve in terms of operative time and component placement/sizing of a robotic system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a team of experienced surgeons, and to investigate mid-term patient outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 101 consecutive patients underwent primary robotic-arm assisted TKA by three surgeons (mean 2 year follow-up). Operative times, component placement, implant sizing and reoperations were recorded. Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) was used to analyse learning curves. Patient outcomes were compared between learning and proficiency phases.

RESULTS

The learning curve was 16 cases, with a 12-min increase in operative time (P < 0.01). Once proficiency was achieved, the greatest time reductions were seen for navigation registration (P = 0.003) and bone preparation (P < 0.0001). A learning curve was found with polyethylene (PE) insert sizing (P = 0.01). No differences were found between learning and proficiency groups in terms of implant survival (100% and 97%, respectively, NS) or patient-reported outcome measures at 2 years (NS).

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a robotic-arm assisted system for TKA led to increased operative times for navigation registration and bone preparation, and a learning curve with PE insert sizing. No difference in patient outcomes between learning and proficiency groups at 2 years was found. These findings can inform surgeons' expectations when starting to use robotic-assisted systems.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助系统越来越多地用于膝关节置换术,但新系统的引入可能涉及学习曲线。我们旨在定义一个经验丰富的外科医生团队使用机器人系统进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)的手术时间和组件放置/尺寸的学习曲线,并研究中期患者结果。

方法

共有 101 例连续患者由 3 名外科医生接受了机器人辅助 TKA(平均 2 年随访)。记录手术时间、组件放置、植入物尺寸和再手术。累积总和(CUSUM)用于分析学习曲线。在学习和熟练阶段比较患者的结果。

结果

学习曲线为 16 例,手术时间增加 12 分钟(P < 0.01)。一旦达到熟练程度,导航注册(P = 0.003)和骨准备(P < 0.0001)的时间减少最大。发现聚乙烯(PE)插入物尺寸存在学习曲线(P = 0.01)。在植入物存活率方面,学习组和熟练组之间没有差异(分别为 100%和 97%,NS)或 2 年时患者报告的结果测量值(NS)。

结论

引入机器人辅助 TKA 系统导致导航注册和骨准备的手术时间增加,并且存在 PE 插入物尺寸的学习曲线。在 2 年时,学习组和熟练组之间的患者结果没有差异。这些发现可以为外科医生在开始使用机器人辅助系统时提供预期。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e086/9804534/34bca192ba41/ANS-92-2974-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e086/9804534/6f4bc872c3e4/ANS-92-2974-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e086/9804534/34bca192ba41/ANS-92-2974-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e086/9804534/6f4bc872c3e4/ANS-92-2974-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e086/9804534/34bca192ba41/ANS-92-2974-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of 16 cases and increased operative time of 12 min.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术有 16 例的学习曲线,手术时间延长 12 分钟。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Nov;92(11):2974-2979. doi: 10.1111/ans.17975. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
2
Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty system has a learning curve of 11 cases and increased operating time.机器人手臂辅助单髁膝关节置换系统有11例的学习曲线且手术时间会增加。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):793-802. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06814-2. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术有一个 7 例的学习曲线,用于融入手术流程,但对于植入物定位的准确性没有学习曲线效应。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1132-1141. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5138-5. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
A novel robotic surgical assistant for total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve ranging from 6 to 14 cases and exhibits high accuracy in tibial bone cuts.一种新型的机器人膝关节置换手术助手的学习曲线在 6 到 14 例之间,在胫骨截骨术中具有高精度。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 17;19(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04984-6.
5
Learning curve analysis of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with a Chinese surgical system.基于中国手术系统的机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的学习曲线分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 27;18(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04382-4.
6
The learning curve of imageless robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty with standardised laxity testing requires the completion of nine cases, but does not reach time neutrality compared to conventional surgery.无图像引导机器人辅助全膝关节置换术结合标准化松弛度测试的学习曲线需要完成 9 例,但与传统手术相比,并未达到时间中性。
Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):503-509. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05630-8. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Learning curve of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its effects on implant position in asian patients: a prospective study.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的学习曲线及其对亚洲患者植入物位置的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 27;24(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06422-w.
8
The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术的学习曲线:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):1033-1042. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2018-0040.R1.
9
The learning curve in robotic assisted knee arthroplasty is flattened by the presence of a surgeon experienced with robotic assisted surgery.机器人辅助膝关节置换术的学习曲线因有经验丰富的机器人辅助手术外科医生而变得平坦。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):760-767. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07048-6. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
The Ability of Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Matching the Efficiency of Its Conventional Counterpart at an Orthopaedic Specialty Hospital.在一家骨科专科医院,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术在效率匹配方面的能力。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan;38(1):72-77.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.07.024. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty: economic impact and workflow efficiency.机器人辅助全髋关节和膝关节置换术:经济影响和工作流程效率。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 8;19(1):578. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02698-3.
2
Precision analysis of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Experience from a high-volume center.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的精准分析。来自高手术量中心的经验。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 20;145(1):417. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05997-4.
3
The learning curve of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty system has a learning curve of 11 cases and increased operating time.机器人手臂辅助单髁膝关节置换系统有11例的学习曲线且手术时间会增加。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):793-802. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06814-2. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
2
Are responders to patient health surveys representative of those invited to participate? An analysis of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Pilot from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.参与患者健康调查的应答者是否具有代表性?来自澳大利亚矫形协会国家关节置换登记处的患者报告结局测量试验分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 2;16(7):e0254196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254196. eCollection 2021.
3
机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的学习曲线:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 6;19(1):456. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02576-y.
4
Learning curve of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a literature review.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的学习曲线:文献综述
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 22;19(1):411. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02597-7.
5
Evaluation of the learning curve in robot-assisted knee arthroplasty: A Systematic review.机器人辅助膝关节置换术中学习曲线的评估:一项系统综述。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 13;12(3):e70292. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70292. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the USA: Nationwide adoption trends towards 70 % by 2030.美国的机器人辅助全膝关节置换术:到2030年全国采用率达70%的趋势
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 May 21;68:103069. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103069. eCollection 2025 Sep.
7
Global trends and hotspots in the learning curves of robotic-assisted surgery: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.机器人辅助手术学习曲线的全球趋势与热点:文献计量学与可视化分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 20;19(1):223. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02391-5.
8
Current developments in robotic assistance technology for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview.全膝关节置换术机器人辅助技术的当前发展:全面概述
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05490-z.
9
Early Learning Curve in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Experience.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的早期学习曲线:单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 28;13(23):7253. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237253.
10
A novel robotic surgical assistant for total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve ranging from 6 to 14 cases and exhibits high accuracy in tibial bone cuts.一种新型的机器人膝关节置换手术助手的学习曲线在 6 到 14 例之间,在胫骨截骨术中具有高精度。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 17;19(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04984-6.
Improved sizing with image-based robotic-assisted system compared to image-free and conventional techniques in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.与无影像和传统技术相比,基于影像的机器人辅助系统在膝关节单髁置换术中可实现更好的假体尺寸选择。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Apr;103-B(4):610-618. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1453.R1.
4
Learning curve for active robotic total knee arthroplasty.主动机器人全膝关节置换术的学习曲线。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2666-2676. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06452-8. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
5
Does the Use of Intraoperative Technology Yield Superior Patient Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?全膝关节置换术后术中技术的应用是否能带来更好的患者结局?
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7S):S227-S232. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
6
Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with a learning curve for surgical time but not for component alignment, limb alignment and gap balancing.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与手术时间的学习曲线相关,但与组件对线、肢体对线和间隙平衡无关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06341-6. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
7
MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.MAKO CT 基于的机械臂辅助系统是全膝关节置换术的一种可靠方法:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Nov;29(11):3585-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06283-z. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial.全膝关节置换与部分膝关节置换治疗内侧间室骨关节炎患者的临床效果和成本效益(TOPKAT):一项随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 31;394(10200):746-756. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31281-4. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
9
Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术有一个 7 例的学习曲线,用于融入手术流程,但对于植入物定位的准确性没有学习曲线效应。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1132-1141. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5138-5. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术的学习曲线:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):1033-1042. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2018-0040.R1.