• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
European Medicines Agency Conflicts With the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on Bisphenol A Regulation.欧洲药品管理局在双酚A监管方面与欧洲食品安全局存在冲突。
J Endocr Soc. 2023 Aug 12;7(9):bvad107. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad107. eCollection 2023 Aug 2.
2
The Conflict between Regulatory Agencies over the 20,000-Fold Lowering of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for Bisphenol A (BPA) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).监管机构对欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)将双酚 A(BPA)的可耐受日摄入量(TDI)降低 20,000 倍产生分歧。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Apr;132(4):45001. doi: 10.1289/EHP13812. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
3
Evidence evaluated by European Food Safety Authority does not support lowering the temporary tolerable daily intake for bisphenol A.欧洲食品安全局评估的证据不支持降低双酚 A 的临时耐受日摄入量。
Toxicol Sci. 2024 Mar 26;198(2):185-190. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad136.
4
Exposure to bisphenol A in European women from 2007 to 2014 using human biomonitoring data - The European Joint Programme HBM4EU.2007 年至 2014 年欧洲妇女双酚 A 暴露水平的人体生物监测数据 - 欧洲联合项目 HBM4EU。
Environ Int. 2024 Aug;190:108912. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108912. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
Bisphenol A (BPA) in food contact materials - new scientific opinion from EFSA regarding public health risk.食品接触材料中的双酚A(BPA)——欧洲食品安全局关于公共卫生风险的新科学意见。
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2015;66(4):299-307.
6
When the weight of evidence does not weigh enough: EFSA's draft scientific opinion on BPA.当证据的权重不足时:EFSA 关于 BPA 的科学意见草案。
Toxicol Sci. 2023 May 31;193(2):115-118. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad034.
7
Drivers of divergent assessments of bisphenol-A hazards to semen quality by various European agencies, regulators and scientists.不同欧洲机构、监管机构和科学家对双酚 A 危害精液质量评估存在分歧的原因。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2024 Jan;255:114293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114293. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
8
[Task and function of the European Food Safety Authority].[欧洲食品安全局的任务与职能]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Sep;47(9):862-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0897-1.
9
EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.欧洲食品安全局成立头十年在转基因生物风险评估方面的科学活动与成果:回顾与展望。
Transgenic Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
10
European Food Safety Authority open access tools to estimate dietary exposure to food chemicals.欧洲食品安全局开放获取工具,以估算食品化学物质的膳食暴露量。
Environ Int. 2021 Apr;149:106357. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106357. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Release of Bisphenol A from Dental Materials: Risks and Future Perspectives.牙科材料中双酚A的释放:风险与未来展望。
J Dent Res. 2025 Jun 16;104(10):220345251337728. doi: 10.1177/00220345251337728.
2
The Conflict between Regulatory Agencies over the 20,000-Fold Lowering of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for Bisphenol A (BPA) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).监管机构对欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)将双酚 A(BPA)的可耐受日摄入量(TDI)降低 20,000 倍产生分歧。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Apr;132(4):45001. doi: 10.1289/EHP13812. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
3
Micro(nano)plastics and Their Potential Impact on Human Gut Health: A Narrative Review.微(纳)塑料及其对人类肠道健康的潜在影响:一篇综述
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024 Mar 21;46(3):2658-2677. doi: 10.3390/cimb46030168.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-evaluation of the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs.对食品中双酚A(BPA)存在所涉公共卫生风险的重新评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Apr 19;21(4):e06857. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.6857. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Evaluating adverse effects of environmental agents in food: a brief critique of the US FDA's criteria.评估食品中环境因素的不良影响:对美国 FDA 标准的简要批评。
Environ Health. 2023 Apr 21;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12940-023-00971-2.
3
Data integration, analysis, and interpretation of eight academic CLARITY-BPA studies.对八项学术 CLARITY-BPA 研究的数据进行整合、分析和解释。
Reprod Toxicol. 2020 Dec;98:29-60. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Exposure to Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F, and Bisphenol S in U.S. Adults and Children: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2014.美国成年人和儿童体内双酚A、双酚F和双酚S的暴露情况:2013 - 2014年国家健康与营养检查调查
ACS Omega. 2018 Jun 30;3(6):6523-6532. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00824. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
5
Burden of disease and costs of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals in the European Union: an updated analysis.欧盟内分泌干扰化学物质暴露的疾病负担和成本:最新分析
Andrology. 2016 Jul;4(4):565-72. doi: 10.1111/andr.12178. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.EDC-2:美国内分泌学会关于内分泌干扰化学物质的第二篇科学声明
Endocr Rev. 2015 Dec;36(6):E1-E150. doi: 10.1210/er.2015-1010. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: the case of bisphenol A.为何公共卫生机构不能将良好实验室规范作为选择数据的标准:以双酚A为例。
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Mar;117(3):309-15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800173. Epub 2008 Oct 22.

欧洲药品管理局在双酚A监管方面与欧洲食品安全局存在冲突。

European Medicines Agency Conflicts With the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on Bisphenol A Regulation.

作者信息

Zoeller R Thomas, Birnbaum Linda S, Collins Terrence J, Heindel Jerrold, Hunt Patricia A, Iguchi Taisen, Kortenkamp Andreas, Myers John Peterson, Vom Saal Frederick S, Sonnenschein Carlos, Soto Ana M

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.

School of Science and Technology, University of Örebro, Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

J Endocr Soc. 2023 Aug 12;7(9):bvad107. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad107. eCollection 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1210/jendso/bvad107
PMID:37873497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10590640/
Abstract

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has revised their estimate of the toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA) and, as a result, have recommended reducing the tolerable daily intake (TDI) by 20 000-fold. This would essentially ban the use of BPA in food packaging such as can liners, plastic food containers, and in consumer products. To come to this conclusion, EFSA used a systematic approach according to a pre-established protocol and included all guideline and nonguideline studies in their analysis. They found that Th-17 immune cells increased with very low exposure to BPA and used this endpoint to revise the TDI to be human health protective. A number of regulatory agencies including the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have written formal disagreements with several elements of EFSA's proposal. The European Commission will now decide whether to accept EFSA's recommendation over the objections of EMA. If the Commission accepts EFSA's recommendation, it will be a landmark action using knowledge acquired through independent scientific studies focused on biomarkers of chronic disease to protect human health. The goal of this Perspective is to clearly articulate the monumental nature of this debate and decision and to explain what is at stake. Our perspective is that the weight of evidence clearly supports EFSA's proposal to reduce the TDI by 20 000-fold.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)已修订其对双酚A(BPA)毒性的评估,因此建议将每日可耐受摄入量(TDI)降低20000倍。这将基本上禁止在食品包装(如罐头内衬、塑料食品容器)以及消费品中使用双酚A。为得出这一结论,欧洲食品安全局根据预先制定的方案采用了系统方法,并在分析中纳入了所有指导性和非指导性研究。他们发现,极低剂量的双酚A暴露会使Th-17免疫细胞增加,并以此为依据修订每日可耐受摄入量,以保护人类健康。包括欧洲药品管理局(EMA)在内的一些监管机构已就欧洲食品安全局提议的多个方面提出了正式异议。欧盟委员会现在将决定是否不顾欧洲药品管理局的反对而接受欧洲食品安全局的建议。如果委员会接受欧洲食品安全局的建议,这将是一项具有里程碑意义的行动,利用通过专注于慢性病生物标志物的独立科学研究获得的知识来保护人类健康。本观点文章的目的是清晰阐明这场辩论和决策的重大性质,并解释其中的利害关系。我们的观点是,证据的分量明显支持欧洲食品安全局将每日可耐受摄入量降低20000倍的提议。