• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲食品安全局评估的证据不支持降低双酚 A 的临时耐受日摄入量。

Evidence evaluated by European Food Safety Authority does not support lowering the temporary tolerable daily intake for bisphenol A.

机构信息

Gradient, Seattle, Washington 98101, USA.

Gradient, Boston, Massachusetts 02108, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Sci. 2024 Mar 26;198(2):185-190. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad136.

DOI:10.1093/toxsci/kfad136
PMID:38265237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10964741/
Abstract

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recently derived a tolerable daily intake (TDI) for bisphenol A (BPA) of 0.2 ng/kg bw/day. There are several issues with EFSA's hazard assessment review process, including that it was based on a limited subset of relevant studies. Multiple public commenters on EFSA's draft evaluation of BPA, including several European regulatory agencies, noted these issues, yet they were not adequately addressed by EFSA in the final evaluation. The TDI for BPA was based on an intermediate immunotoxicity endpoint in mice that has not been observed in other species; there is no evidence that it is a precursor event to any downstream pathological outcome. The TDI is several orders of magnitude lower than estimates of safe doses of BPA established by agencies worldwide, including EFSA's temporary TDI (t-TDI) for BPA established in 2015. Overall, the EFSA hazard assessment review process has led to a conclusion that there are low-dose effects of BPA based on very few, lower quality experimental animal studies. This conclusion is not supported by the totality of the available evidence, which includes multiple high-quality studies not considered by EFSA and indicates that the t-TDI established in 2015 is protective of human health.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局 (EFSA) 最近为双酚 A (BPA) 制定了可耐受每日摄入量 (TDI),为 0.2ng/kg bw/day。EFSA 的危害评估审查过程存在几个问题,包括它基于相关研究的有限子集。包括几个欧洲监管机构在内的 EFSA 对 BPA 的草案评估的多位公众评论员指出了这些问题,但 EFSA 在最终评估中并未充分解决这些问题。BPA 的 TDI 基于在其他物种中未观察到的小鼠中间免疫毒性终点;没有证据表明它是任何下游病理结果的前体事件。TDI 比包括 EFSA 于 2015 年制定的临时 TDI(t-TDI)在内的全球各机构确定的 BPA 安全剂量估计值低几个数量级。总体而言,EFSA 的危害评估审查过程得出的结论是,BPA 存在低剂量效应,依据的是极少数低质量的实验动物研究。这一结论与现有证据的总体情况不符,其中包括 EFSA 未考虑的多项高质量研究,这表明 2015 年制定的 t-TDI 可保护人类健康。

相似文献

1
Evidence evaluated by European Food Safety Authority does not support lowering the temporary tolerable daily intake for bisphenol A.欧洲食品安全局评估的证据不支持降低双酚 A 的临时耐受日摄入量。
Toxicol Sci. 2024 Mar 26;198(2):185-190. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad136.
2
The Conflict between Regulatory Agencies over the 20,000-Fold Lowering of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for Bisphenol A (BPA) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).监管机构对欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)将双酚 A(BPA)的可耐受日摄入量(TDI)降低 20,000 倍产生分歧。
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Apr;132(4):45001. doi: 10.1289/EHP13812. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
3
Assessment of recent developmental immunotoxicity studies with bisphenol A in the context of the 2015 EFSA t-TDI.在2015年欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)的经时每日摄入量(t-TDI)背景下,对双酚A近期发育免疫毒性研究的评估
Reprod Toxicol. 2016 Oct;65:448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
4
Drivers of divergent assessments of bisphenol-A hazards to semen quality by various European agencies, regulators and scientists.不同欧洲机构、监管机构和科学家对双酚 A 危害精液质量评估存在分歧的原因。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2024 Jan;255:114293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114293. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
5
When the weight of evidence does not weigh enough: EFSA's draft scientific opinion on BPA.当证据的权重不足时:EFSA 关于 BPA 的科学意见草案。
Toxicol Sci. 2023 May 31;193(2):115-118. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad034.
6
European Medicines Agency Conflicts With the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) on Bisphenol A Regulation.欧洲药品管理局在双酚A监管方面与欧洲食品安全局存在冲突。
J Endocr Soc. 2023 Aug 12;7(9):bvad107. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad107. eCollection 2023 Aug 2.
7
Bisphenol A (BPA) in food contact materials - new scientific opinion from EFSA regarding public health risk.食品接触材料中的双酚A(BPA)——欧洲食品安全局关于公共卫生风险的新科学意见。
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2015;66(4):299-307.
8
Critical evaluation of key evidence on the human health hazards of exposure to bisphenol A.对双酚 A 暴露对人体健康危害的关键证据进行批判性评估。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2011 Apr;41(4):263-91. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2011.558487.
9
Exposure to bisphenol A in European women from 2007 to 2014 using human biomonitoring data - The European Joint Programme HBM4EU.2007 年至 2014 年欧洲妇女双酚 A 暴露水平的人体生物监测数据 - 欧洲联合项目 HBM4EU。
Environ Int. 2024 Aug;190:108912. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108912. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
10
IVIVE-PBPK based new approach methodology for addressing early life toxicity induced by Bisphenol A.基于 IVIVE-PBPK 的新方法学,用于解决双酚 A 诱导的早期生命毒性。
Environ Res. 2024 Jan 1;240(Pt 1):117343. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117343. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Bisphenol A on the Molecular Biological Characteristics of Human Colon Adenocarcinoma HT-29 Culture Cells.双酚A对人结肠腺癌HT-29培养细胞分子生物学特性的影响
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1007/s10517-025-06447-2.
2
Determination of bisphenol A in different types of soft drink samples by MSPE-GC/MS technique and contribution to risk assessment.采用MSPE-GC/MS技术测定不同类型软饮料样品中的双酚A及其对风险评估的贡献。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09306-2.
3
Release of Bisphenol A from Dental Materials: Risks and Future Perspectives.牙科材料中双酚A的释放:风险与未来展望。
J Dent Res. 2025 Jun 16;104(10):220345251337728. doi: 10.1177/00220345251337728.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-evaluation of the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs.对食品中双酚A(BPA)存在所涉公共卫生风险的重新评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Apr 19;21(4):e06857. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.6857. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
When the weight of evidence does not weigh enough: EFSA's draft scientific opinion on BPA.当证据的权重不足时:EFSA 关于 BPA 的科学意见草案。
Toxicol Sci. 2023 May 31;193(2):115-118. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfad034.
3
Bisphenol A, T17 cells, and allergy: a commentary.双酚 A、T17 细胞与过敏:述评。
J Immunotoxicol. 2022 Dec;19(1):93-99. doi: 10.1080/1547691X.2022.2113842.
4
Th17 Lymphocytes in Children with Asthma: Do They Influence Control?哮喘患儿中的 Th17 淋巴细胞:它们会影响控制吗?
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2021 Dec;34(4):147-152. doi: 10.1089/ped.2021.0067.
5
What Does CLARITY-BPA Mean for Canadians?CLARITY-BPA 对加拿大人意味着什么?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;18(13):7001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137001.
6
Differential influences of the BPA, BPS and BPF on in vitro IL-17 secretion by mouse and human T cells.双酚 A、BPS 和 BPF 对体外培养的小鼠和人 T 细胞分泌 IL-17 的差异影响。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2020 Dec;69:104993. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104993. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
7
Guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments.科学评估中证据权重方法的使用指南。
EFSA J. 2017 Aug 3;15(8):e04971. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971. eCollection 2017 Aug.
8
A two-year toxicology study of bisphenol A (BPA) in Sprague-Dawley rats: CLARITY-BPA core study results.双酚 A(BPA)在 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠中的两年毒理学研究:CLARITY-BPA 核心研究结果。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Oct;132:110728. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.110728. Epub 2019 Jul 28.
9
CLARITY-BPA: Effects of chronic Bisphenol A exposure on the immune system: Part 1 - Quantification of the relative number and proportion of leukocyte populations in the spleen and thymus.CLARITY-BPA:双酚 A 慢性暴露对免疫系统的影响:第 1 部分-脾脏和胸腺中白细胞群体的相对数量和比例的定量。
Toxicology. 2018 Mar 1;396-397:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
10
CLARITY-BPA: Effects of chronic bisphenol A exposure on the immune system: Part 2 - Characterization of lymphoproliferative and immune effector responses by splenic leukocytes.CLARITY-BPA:慢性双酚 A 暴露对免疫系统的影响:第 2 部分-脾白细胞的淋巴增殖和免疫效应应答特征。
Toxicology. 2018 Mar 1;396-397:54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 7.