• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球卫生与公共卫生教育的电子学习评估框架及工具:一项范围综述方案

e-Learning Evaluation Framework and Tools for Global Health and Public Health Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

作者信息

Bahattab Awsan, Hanna Michel, Teo Voicescu George, Hubloue Ives, Della Corte Francesco, Ragazzoni Luca

机构信息

Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid, and Global Health, Novara, Italy.

Department for Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Vercelli, Italy.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e49955. doi: 10.2196/49955.

DOI:10.2196/49955
PMID:37874640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10630868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a significant increase in the use of e-learning for global and public health education recently, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. e-Learning holds the potential to offer equal opportunities, overcoming barriers like physical limitations and training costs. However, its effectiveness remains debated, with institutions unprepared for the sudden shift during the pandemic. To effectively evaluate the outcomes of e-learning, a standardized and rigorous approach is necessary. However, the existing literature on this subject often lacks standardized assessment tools and theoretical foundations, leading to ambiguity in the evaluation process. Consequently, it becomes imperative to identify a clear theoretical foundation and practical approach for evaluating global and public health e-learning outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This protocol for a scoping review aims to map the state of e-learning evaluation in global and public health education to determine the existing theoretical evaluation frameworks, methods, tools, and domains and the gaps in research and practice.

METHODS

The scoping review will be conducted following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The initial search was performed in PubMed, Education Resource Information Center, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed articles that report on the use of evaluation and assessment for e-learning training. The search strings combined the concepts of e-learning, public health, and health science education, along with evaluation and frameworks. After the initial search, a screening process will be carried out to determine the relevance of the identified studies to the research question. Data related to the characteristics of the included studies, the characteristics of the e-learning technology used in the studies, and the study outcomes will be extracted from the eligible articles. The extracted data will then undergo a structured, descriptive, quantitative, and qualitative content analysis to synthesize the information from the selected studies.

RESULTS

Initial database searches yielded a total of 980 results. Duplicates have been removed, and title and abstract screening of the 805 remaining extracted articles are underway. Quantitative and qualitative findings from the reviewed articles will be presented to answer the study objective.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review will provide global and public health educators with a comprehensive overview of the current state of e-learning evaluation. By identifying existing e-learning frameworks and tools, the findings will offer valuable guidance for further advancements in global and public health e-learning evaluation. The study will also enable the creation of a comprehensive, evidence-based e-learning evaluation framework and tools, which will improve the quality and accountability of global health and public health education. Ultimately, this will contribute to better health outcomes.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/49955.

摘要

背景

近年来,电子学习在全球和公共卫生教育中的应用显著增加,尤其是在新冠疫情之后。电子学习有潜力提供平等的机会,克服身体限制和培训成本等障碍。然而,其有效性仍存在争议,各机构在疫情期间对这一突然转变毫无准备。为了有效评估电子学习的成果,需要一种标准化且严格的方法。然而,关于这一主题的现有文献往往缺乏标准化的评估工具和理论基础,导致评估过程含糊不清。因此,确定一个明确的理论基础和实用方法来评估全球和公共卫生电子学习成果变得至关重要。

目的

本范围综述方案旨在梳理全球和公共卫生教育中电子学习评估的现状,以确定现有的理论评估框架、方法、工具和领域,以及研究和实践中的差距。

方法

范围综述将按照PRISMA-ScR(系统评价与Meta分析扩展版范围综述的首选报告项目)指南进行。最初在PubMed、教育资源信息中心、科学网和Scopus中进行搜索,以识别报告电子学习培训评估和评价使用情况的同行评议文章。搜索词结合了电子学习、公共卫生和健康科学教育的概念,以及评价和框架。初步搜索后,将进行筛选过程,以确定所识别研究与研究问题的相关性。将从符合条件的文章中提取与纳入研究的特征、研究中使用的电子学习技术的特征以及研究结果相关的数据。然后,对提取的数据进行结构化、描述性、定量和定性的内容分析,以综合所选研究的信息。

结果

初步数据库搜索共产生980条结果。重复项已被删除,目前正在对剩余的805篇提取文章进行标题和摘要筛选。将展示综述文章的定量和定性研究结果,以回答研究目的。

结论

本范围综述将为全球和公共卫生教育工作者提供电子学习评估现状的全面概述。通过识别现有的电子学习框架和工具,研究结果将为全球和公共卫生电子学习评估的进一步发展提供有价值的指导。该研究还将促成创建一个全面的、基于证据的电子学习评估框架和工具,这将提高全球卫生和公共卫生教育的质量和问责制。最终,这将有助于实现更好的健康结果。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/49955。

相似文献

1
e-Learning Evaluation Framework and Tools for Global Health and Public Health Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.全球卫生与公共卫生教育的电子学习评估框架及工具:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e49955. doi: 10.2196/49955.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Exploring Curriculum Considerations to Prepare Future Radiographers for an AI-Assisted Health Care Environment: Protocol for Scoping Review.探索课程考量,为未来放射技师适应人工智能辅助医疗环境做好准备:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 6;14:e60431. doi: 10.2196/60431.
6
eHealth Tools Supporting Early Childhood Education and Care Centers to Assess and Enhance Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments: Protocol for a Scoping Review.支持幼儿教育与照料中心评估和改善营养与身体活动环境的电子健康工具:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e52252. doi: 10.2196/52252.
7
Exploring Molecular Genetics Research on Obesity in Malaysia: Protocol for a Scoping Review.探索马来西亚肥胖症的分子遗传学研究:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 30;13:e60838. doi: 10.2196/60838.
8
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
9
Assessing and Enhancing Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments in Early Childhood Education and Care Centers: Scoping Review of eHealth Tools.评估与改善幼儿教育与保育中心的营养与身体活动环境:电子健康工具的范围综述
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Jan 22;8:e68372. doi: 10.2196/68372.
10
Decolonization in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Methods: Protocol for a Scoping Review.性与生殖健康研究方法中的去殖民化:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 14;12:e45771. doi: 10.2196/45771.

引用本文的文献

1
Humanitarian health education and training state-of-the-art: a scoping review.人道主义健康教育和培训最新进展:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;12:1343867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1343867. eCollection 2024.
2
Development and evaluation of scenario-based e-simulation for humanitarian health training: a mixed-methods action research study.基于情景的人道主义卫生培训电子模拟的开发和评估:一项混合方法行动研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 5;14(8):e079681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079681.

本文引用的文献

1
Asynchronous e-learning with technology-enabled and enhanced training for continuing education of nurses: a scoping review.利用技术支持和增强培训的异步电子学习,为护士继续教育提供支持:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04477-w.
2
Learning Outcomes and Educational Effectiveness of E-Learning as a Continuing Professional Development Intervention for Practicing Surgeons and Proceduralists: A Systematic Review.电子学习作为一种针对执业外科医生和程序专家的继续职业发展干预措施的学习成果和教育效果:系统评价。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Aug;80(8):1139-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
Comprehensive evaluation of the use of technology in education - validation with a cohort of global open online learners.
教育技术应用的综合评估——基于全球开放在线学习者群体的验证
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(7):9877-9911. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10986-w. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester.高等教育中的应急远程教学:绘制首个全球在线学期情况
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.COVID-19 大流行期间的卫生专业教育中的电子学习:系统评价。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:27. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
Projection of E-Learning in Higher Education: A Study of Its Scientific Production in Web of Science.高等教育中电子学习的展望:对其在科学网中学术成果的研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Jan 10;11(1):20-32. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11010003.
7
Global Research Activity on E-Learning in Health Sciences Education: a Bibliometric Analysis.健康科学教育中电子学习的全球研究活动:文献计量分析
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Mar 2;31(2):765-775. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01254-6. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家医学教育电子学习评估:一项系统综述。
Comput Educ. 2020 Feb;145:103726. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726.
9
Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自适应电子学习对卫生专业人员和学生的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e025252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025252.
10
How We Evaluate Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Systematic Review.我们如何评估医学研究生电子学习:系统综述。
JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Apr 5;5(1):e13128. doi: 10.2196/13128.