Suppr超能文献

孕期使用电子烟与不良出生结局风险:美国妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)人群的横断面监测研究。

Electronic cigarette use during pregnancy and the risk of adverse birth outcomes: A cross-sectional surveillance study of the US Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) population.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 24;18(10):e0287348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287348. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research on health effects and potential harms of electronic cigarette (EC) use during pregnancy is limited. We sought to determine the risks of pregnancy EC use on pregnancy-related adverse birth outcomes and assess whether quitting ECs reduces the risks.

METHODS

Women with singleton live births who participated in the US Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey study 2016-2020 were classified into four mutually exclusive groups, by their use of ECs and combustible cigarettes (CCs) during pregnancy: non-use, EC only use, CC only use, and dual use. We determined the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) by comparing cigarette users to non-users with a modified Poisson regression model adjusting for covariates. In a subset of women who all used ECs prior to pregnancy, we determined whether quitting EC use reduces the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and SGA by comparing to those who continued its use. All analyses were weighted to account for the PRAMS survey design and non-response rate.

RESULTS

Of the 190,707 women (weighted N = 10,202,413) included, 92.1% reported cigarette non-use, 0.5% EC only use, 6.7% CC only use, and 0.7% dual use during pregnancy. Compared with non-use, EC only use was associated with a significantly increased risk of preterm birth (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00, 1.65) and low birth weight (aRR: 1.38, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.75), but not SGA (aRR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.76, 1.44). Among 7,877 (weighted N = 422,533) women EC users, quitting use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of low birth weight (aRR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.62, 0.94) and SGA (aRR: 0.77, 95%CI: 0.62, 0.94) compared to those who continued to use ECs during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy EC use, by itself or dual use with CC, is associated with preterm birth and low birth weight. Quitting use reduces that risk. ECs should not be considered as a safe alternative nor a viable gestational smoking cessation strategy.

摘要

背景

关于电子烟(EC)使用对妊娠相关不良出生结局的影响和潜在危害的研究有限。我们旨在确定妊娠期间使用 EC 的风险,并评估戒烟是否能降低风险。

方法

2016-2020 年,参加美国妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)调查研究的单胎活产女性被分为四组,根据其在妊娠期间使用 EC 和可燃香烟(CC)的情况进行分类:不使用、仅使用 EC、仅使用 CC 和同时使用。我们通过比较使用香烟的女性与未使用香烟的女性,使用改良泊松回归模型调整协变量来确定早产、低出生体重和小于胎龄儿(SGA)的风险。在所有使用 EC 的女性中,我们通过比较继续使用 EC 的女性和戒烟的女性,确定戒烟是否能降低早产、低出生体重和 SGA 的风险。所有分析均进行了加权,以考虑 PRAMS 调查设计和无应答率。

结果

在纳入的 190707 名女性(加权 N=10202413)中,92.1%报告不使用香烟,0.5%报告仅使用 EC,6.7%报告仅使用 CC,0.7%报告同时使用 EC 和 CC。与不使用相比,仅使用 EC 与早产(调整后的风险比[aRR]:1.29,95%置信区间[CI]:1.00,1.65)和低出生体重(aRR:1.38,95%CI:1.09,1.75)的风险显著增加相关,但与 SGA 无关(aRR:1.04,95%CI:0.76,1.44)。在 7877 名(加权 N=422533)EC 用户中,戒烟与低出生体重(aRR:0.76,95%CI:0.62,0.94)和 SGA(aRR:0.77,95%CI:0.62,0.94)的风险显著降低相关,与继续在妊娠期间使用 EC 的女性相比。

结论

妊娠期间单独使用 EC 或与 CC 联合使用与早产和低出生体重有关。戒烟可降低风险。EC 不应被视为安全的替代品,也不应作为妊娠期戒烟的可行策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d9/10597477/63fa09c38470/pone.0287348.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验