• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在英国家庭中长期监测微生物组时使用微创的家庭自我采样。

Assessing the use of minimally invasive self-sampling at home for long-term monitoring of the microbiota within UK families.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 24;13(1):18201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45574-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-45574-6
PMID:37875557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10598218/
Abstract

Monitoring the presence of commensal and pathogenic respiratory microorganisms is of critical global importance. However, community-based surveillance is difficult because nasopharyngeal swabs are uncomfortable and painful for a wide age range of participants. We designed a methodology for minimally invasive self-sampling at home and assessed its use for longitudinal monitoring of the oral, nasal and hand microbiota of adults and children within families. Healthy families with two adults and up to three children, living in and near Liverpool, United Kingdom, self-collected saliva, nasal lining fluid using synthetic absorptive matrices and hand swabs at home every two weeks for six months. Questionnaires were used to collect demographic and epidemiological data and assess feasibility and acceptability. Participants were invited to take part in an exit interview. Thirty-three families completed the study. Sampling using our approach was acceptable to 25/33 (76%) families, as sampling was fast (76%), easy (76%) and painless (60%). Saliva and hand sampling was acceptable to all participants of any age, whereas nasal sampling was accepted mostly by adults and children older than 5 years. Multi-niche self-sampling at home can be used by adults and children for longitudinal surveillance of respiratory microorganisms, providing key data for design of future studies.

摘要

监测共生和致病呼吸道微生物的存在具有全球重要性。然而,基于社区的监测很困难,因为鼻咽拭子对广泛年龄段的参与者来说既不舒服又痛苦。我们设计了一种在家中进行微创自我采样的方法,并评估了其用于监测家庭内成年人和儿童的口腔、鼻腔和手部微生物组的纵向使用情况。在英国利物浦及其附近居住的健康家庭,由两名成年人和最多三名儿童组成,他们在家中每两周自行采集唾液、使用合成吸收垫采集鼻腔衬里液和手部拭子,持续六个月。问卷调查用于收集人口统计学和流行病学数据,并评估可行性和可接受性。参与者被邀请参加退出访谈。33 个家庭完成了研究。我们的方法采样得到了 25/33(76%)个家庭的认可,因为采样速度快(76%)、简单(76%)且无痛(60%)。唾液和手部采样被任何年龄的参与者都接受了,而鼻腔采样则主要被 5 岁以上的成年人和儿童接受。家庭多生态位自我采样可用于成年人和儿童对呼吸道微生物的纵向监测,为未来研究的设计提供关键数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/dd2760967d0d/41598_2023_45574_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/5bbeeb956cad/41598_2023_45574_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/13facdea5644/41598_2023_45574_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/288ae65eac75/41598_2023_45574_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/9600e638baa1/41598_2023_45574_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/dd2760967d0d/41598_2023_45574_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/5bbeeb956cad/41598_2023_45574_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/13facdea5644/41598_2023_45574_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/288ae65eac75/41598_2023_45574_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/9600e638baa1/41598_2023_45574_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/10598218/dd2760967d0d/41598_2023_45574_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the use of minimally invasive self-sampling at home for long-term monitoring of the microbiota within UK families.评估在英国家庭中长期监测微生物组时使用微创的家庭自我采样。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 24;13(1):18201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45574-6.
2
Participant perceptions and experiences of a novel community-based respiratory longitudinal sampling method in Liverpool, UK: A mixed methods feasibility study.英国利物浦一种新型基于社区的呼吸道纵向采样方法的参与者认知和体验:一项混合方法可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0294133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294133. eCollection 2023.
3
Feasibility study for the use of self-collected nasal swabs to identify pathogens among participants of a population-based surveillance system for acute respiratory infections (GrippeWeb-Plus)-Germany, 2016.利用自我采集的鼻腔拭子鉴定基于人群的急性呼吸道感染监测系统(GrippeWeb-Plus)参与者中病原体的可行性研究——德国,2016 年。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2019 Jul;13(4):319-330. doi: 10.1111/irv.12644. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
4
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
5
Feasibility and acceptability of frequent vaginal self-sampling at home by Rwandan women at high risk of urogenital tract infections.卢旺达高风险生殖道感染女性在家中频繁进行阴道自我采样的可行性和可接受性。
Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Feb;98(1):58-61. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054816. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
6
Prospective Study of the Performance of Parent-Collected Nasal and Saliva Swab Samples, Compared with Nurse-Collected Swab Samples, for the Molecular Detection of Respiratory Microorganisms.前瞻性研究家长采集的鼻拭子和唾液拭子样本与护士采集的拭子样本在呼吸道微生物分子检测中的性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0016421. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00164-21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
The acceptability and validity of self-collected nasal swabs for detection of influenza virus infection among older adults in Thailand.泰国老年人中自我采集鼻拭子检测流感病毒感染的可接受性和有效性。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017 Sep;11(5):412-417. doi: 10.1111/irv.12471. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
8
Feasibility, acceptability, and bacterial recovery for community-based sample collection to estimate antibiotic resistance in commensal gut and upper respiratory tract bacteria.社区为基础的样本采集方法估计共生肠道和上呼吸道细菌抗生素耐药性的可行性、可接受性和细菌回收率。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):22512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27084-z.
9
Nasopharyngeal swabs vs. saliva sampling for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A cross-sectional survey of acceptability for caregivers and children after experiencing both methods.鼻咽拭子与唾液采样检测 SARS-CoV-2:经历过两种方法的护理人员和儿童对可接受性的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270929. eCollection 2022.
10
At-home self-collection of saliva, oropharyngeal swabs and dried blood spots for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and serology: Post-collection acceptability of specimen collection process and patient confidence in specimens.用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断和血清学的家庭自行采集唾液、口咽拭子和干血斑:采集后标本采集过程的可接受性以及患者对标本的信心。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 5;15(8):e0236775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236775. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Online46: Online cognitive assessments in elderly cohorts-The British 1946 birth cohort case study.在线46:老年人群体中的在线认知评估——以英国1946年出生队列为例的案例研究。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025 Jun 9;17(2):e70098. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70098. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Acceptability of self-sampling and self-testing for infections: a rapid systematic review on public users' views.感染自我采样和自我检测的可接受性:关于公众用户观点的快速系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21773-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Participant perceptions and experiences of a novel community-based respiratory longitudinal sampling method in Liverpool, UK: A mixed methods feasibility study.英国利物浦一种新型基于社区的呼吸道纵向采样方法的参与者认知和体验:一项混合方法可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0294133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294133. eCollection 2023.
2
Household transmission of influenza A and B within a prospective cohort during the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 seasons.2013-2014 年和 2014-2015 年季节期间,前瞻性队列中 A 型和 B 型流感在家中的传播。
Stat Med. 2021 Dec 10;40(28):6260-6276. doi: 10.1002/sim.9181. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
3
Experimental Human Challenge Defines Distinct Pneumococcal Kinetic Profiles and Mucosal Responses between Colonized and Non-Colonized Adults.
实验性人体挑战定义了定植和未定植成人之间不同的肺炎球菌动力学特征和黏膜反应。
mBio. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):e02020-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02020-20.
4
Saliva Alternative to Upper Respiratory Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis.唾液替代上呼吸道拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 诊断。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;26(11):2770-2771. doi: 10.3201/eid2611.203283. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
'Self-collected upper respiratory tract swabs for COVID-19 test': A feasible way to increase overall testing rate and conserve resources in South Africa.“自我采集用于新冠病毒检测的上呼吸道拭子”:提高南非总体检测率并节约资源的可行方法。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020 May 28;12(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2445.
6
Minimally Invasive Nasal Sampling in Children Offers Accurate Pneumococcal Colonization Detection.微创鼻腔采样在儿童中可提供准确的肺炎链球菌定植检测。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 Nov;38(11):1147-1149. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002454.
7
Bacterial and viral respiratory tract microbiota and host characteristics in children with lower respiratory tract infections: a matched case-control study.儿童下呼吸道感染中细菌和病毒呼吸道微生物群与宿主特征的匹配病例对照研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 May;7(5):417-426. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30449-1. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
The Respiratory Specimen Collection Trial (ReSpeCT): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Quality and Timeliness of Respiratory Sample Collection in the Home by Parents and Healthcare Workers From Children Aged <2 Years.呼吸标本采集试验(ReSpeCT):一项随机对照试验,比较 2 岁以下儿童家长和医护人员在家中采集呼吸道样本的质量和及时性。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020 Apr 30;9(2):134-141. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piy136.
9
Respiratory disease mortality in the United Kingdom compared with EU15+ countries in 1985-2015: observational study.1985-2015 年英国与欧盟 15 国+的呼吸疾病死亡率比较:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4680. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4680.
10
Hands are vehicles for transmission of in novel controlled human infection study.在新型可控人类感染研究中,手是传播……的媒介。(原文“transmission of”后缺少具体内容)
Eur Respir J. 2018 Oct 10;52(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00599-2018. Print 2018 Oct.