Research Department, The Association of Experts in the Field of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, Kamennoostrovsky Ave., 410, Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation.
Department of Psychotherapy, Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, 6-8, L. Tolstoy str, Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation.
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Oct 24;16(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06553-2.
Hypnosis can be an effective treatment for many conditions, and there have been attempts to develop instrumental approaches to continuously monitor hypnotic state level ("depth"). However, there is no method that addresses the individual variability of electrophysiological hypnotic correlates. We explore the possibility of using an EEG-based passive brain-computer interface (pBCI) for real-time, individualised estimation of the hypnosis deepening process.
The wakefulness and deep hypnosis intervals were manually defined and labelled in 27 electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings obtained from eight outpatients after hypnosis sessions. Spectral analysis showed that EEG correlates of deep hypnosis were relatively stable in each patient throughout the treatment but varied between patients. Data from each first session was used to train classification models to continuously assess deep hypnosis probability in subsequent sessions. Models trained using four frequency bands (1.5-45, 1.5-8, 1.5-14, and 4-15 Hz) showed accuracy mostly exceeding 85% in a 10-fold cross-validation. Real-time classification accuracy was also acceptable, so at least one of the four bands yielded results exceeding 74% in any session. The best results averaged across all sessions were obtained using 1.5-14 and 4-15 Hz, with an accuracy of 82%. The revealed issues are also discussed.
催眠可以作为许多疾病的有效治疗方法,人们已经尝试开发出一些工具来连续监测催眠状态水平(“深度”)。然而,目前还没有一种方法可以解决电生理催眠相关指标的个体差异问题。我们探索了使用基于脑电图的被动脑-机接口(pBCI)实时、个体化估计催眠深化过程的可能性。
在 8 名门诊患者的 27 次脑电图(EEG)记录中,手动定义并标记了清醒和深度催眠间隔。频谱分析表明,在整个治疗过程中,每个患者的深度催眠 EEG 相关指标都相对稳定,但在患者之间存在差异。每个初始会话的数据都用于训练分类模型,以在后续会话中连续评估深度催眠的概率。使用四个频带(1.5-45、1.5-8、1.5-14 和 4-15 Hz)训练的模型在 10 倍交叉验证中的准确率大多超过 85%。实时分类准确率也可以接受,因此在任何会话中,至少有一个频带的结果都超过 74%。使用 1.5-14 和 4-15 Hz 获得的所有会话的平均最佳结果为 82%。还讨论了所揭示的问题。