• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外膜肺氧合中限制氧合的混合治疗:一项随机对照注册研究(BLENDER)试验:研究方案和统计分析计划

Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan.

作者信息

Burrell Aidan, Ng Sze, Ottosen Kelly, Bailey Michael, Buscher Hergen, Fraser John, Udy Andrew, Gattas David, Totaro Richard, Bellomo Rinaldo, Forrest Paul, Martin Emma, Reid Liadain, Ziegenfuss Marc, Eastwood Glenn, Higgins Alisa, Hodgson Carol, Litton Edward, Nair Priya, Orford Neil, Pellegrino Vince, Shekar Kiran, Trapani Tony, Pilcher David

机构信息

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Aug 4;25(3):118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.001
PMID:37876374
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10581278/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Critically ill patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) are at risk of developing severe arterial hyperoxia, which has been associated with increased mortality. Lower saturation targets in this population may lead to deleterious episodes of severe hypoxia. This manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial.

DESIGN

The BLENDER trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, registry-embedded, randomised clinical trial., registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03841084) and approved by The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee project ID HREC/50486/Alfred-2019.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Patients supported by VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest who are enrolled in the Australian national ECMO registry.

INTERVENTION

The study compares a conservative oxygenation strategy (target arterial saturations 92-96%) with a liberal oxygenation strategy (target 97-100%).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome is the number of intensive care unit (ICU)-free days for patients alive at day 60. Secondary outcomes include duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital mortality, the number of hypoxic episodes, neurocognitive outcomes, and health economic analyses. The 300-patient sample size enables us to detect a 3-day difference in ICU-free days at day 60, assuming a mean ICU-free days of 11 days, with a risk of type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%. Data will be analysed according to a predefined analysis plan. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper details the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the BLENDER trial, a registry-embedded, multicentre interventional trial comparing liberal and conservative oxygenation strategies in VA ECMO.

摘要

引言

接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA ECMO)支持的重症患者有发生严重动脉血氧过高的风险,这与死亡率增加有关。该人群中较低的饱和度目标可能会导致严重缺氧的有害发作。本文描述了“在ECMO中混合以限制氧合:一项随机对照注册研究”(BLENDER)试验的方案和统计分析计划。

设计

BLENDER试验是一项务实的、多中心的、注册登记式的随机临床试验,已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03841084),并获得阿尔弗雷德医院伦理委员会批准(项目ID HREC/50486/Alfred - 2019)。

参与者和研究地点

纳入澳大利亚国家ECMO注册登记的、接受VA ECMO支持的心源性休克或心脏骤停患者。

干预措施

该研究将保守氧合策略(目标动脉饱和度92 - 96%)与宽松氧合策略(目标97 - 100%)进行比较。

主要结局指标

主要结局是第60天时存活患者的无重症监护病房(ICU)天数。次要结局包括机械通气时间、ICU和医院死亡率、缺氧发作次数、神经认知结局以及卫生经济学分析。300例患者的样本量使我们能够检测出第60天时无ICU天数的3天差异,假设平均无ICU天数为11天,I型错误风险为5%,检验效能为80%。数据将根据预定义的分析计划进行分析。研究结果将在同行评审的出版物上发表。

结论

本文详细介绍了BLENDER试验的方案和统计分析计划,这是一项注册登记式的多中心干预试验,比较了VA ECMO中宽松和保守氧合策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/78573a88ec4e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/27b9393b731c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/e8db4c9169ec/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/60e16355bde7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/78573a88ec4e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/27b9393b731c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/e8db4c9169ec/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/60e16355bde7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a559/10581278/78573a88ec4e/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan.体外膜肺氧合中限制氧合的混合治疗:一项随机对照注册研究(BLENDER)试验:研究方案和统计分析计划
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Aug 4;25(3):118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Conservative or liberal oxygen targets in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.在接受体外膜肺氧合的患者中,保守或宽松的氧目标。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep;50(9):1470-1483. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07564-8. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
4
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
5
Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the mega randomised registry trial research program comparing conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets in adults receiving unplanned invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU (Mega-ROX).比较重症监护病房(ICU)中接受非计划性有创机械通气的成人患者保守与宽松氧合目标的大型随机注册试验研究项目的方案和统计分析计划(Mega-ROX)
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 19;24(2):137-149. doi: 10.51893/2022.2.OA4. eCollection 2022 Jun 6.
6
Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the mega randomised registry trial comparing conservative vs. liberal oxygenation targets in adults in the intensive care unit with suspected hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy following a cardiac arrest (Mega-ROX HIE).心脏骤停后疑似缺氧缺血性脑病的重症监护病房成人患者中比较保守与宽松氧合目标的大型随机注册试验的方案和统计分析计划(Mega-ROX HIE)
Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Jun 21;26(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.03.004. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Randomized controlled trial of ultra-protective vs. protective ventilation strategy in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients with refractory cardiogenic shock: a study protocol for the ultra-ECMO trial.静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗难治性心源性休克患者时超保护性通气策略与保护性通气策略的随机对照试验:超体外膜肺氧合(ultra-ECMO)试验的研究方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 5;10:1092653. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1092653. eCollection 2023.
8
Oxygenation During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Physiology, Current Evidence, and a Pragmatic Approach to Oxygen Titration.脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合期间的氧合:生理学、现有证据以及氧滴定的实用方法。
Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 1;52(4):637-648. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006134. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
9
Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the low oxygen intervention for cardiac arrest injury limitation (LOGICAL) trial.心脏骤停损伤限制低氧干预(LOGICAL)试验的方案总结与统计分析计划
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Jul 26;25(3):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.007. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Scrutinizing the Role of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Has Clinical Practice Outpaced the Evidence?审视静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合的作用:临床实践是否超越了证据?
Circulation. 2024 Mar 26;149(13):1033-1052. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067087. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Conservative or liberal oxygen targets in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.在接受体外膜肺氧合的患者中,保守或宽松的氧目标。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep;50(9):1470-1483. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07564-8. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Lower vs Higher Oxygen Saturation Targets on Survival to Hospital Discharge Among Patients Resuscitated After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The EXACT Randomized Clinical Trial.EXACT 随机临床试验:院外心脏骤停复苏患者的低与高目标血氧饱和度对出院时生存的影响。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 8;328(18):1818-1826. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.17701.
2
Oxygen-Saturation Targets for Critically Ill Adults Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.重症机械通气患者的氧饱和度目标。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Nov 10;387(19):1759-1769. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208415. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
3
Early hyperoxia and 28-day mortality in patients on venoarterial ECMO support for refractory cardiogenic shock: a bicenter retrospective propensity score-weighted analysis.
在接受体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)治疗难治性心源性休克的患者中,早期高氧血症与 28 天死亡率的关系:一项基于双中心回顾性倾向评分加权分析。
Crit Care. 2022 Aug 26;26(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04133-7.
4
Hyperoxia and mortality in conventional versus extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.传统心肺复苏与体外心肺复苏中的高氧血症与死亡率
J Crit Care. 2022 Jun;69:154001. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154001. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
5
Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.急性低氧性呼吸衰竭的低氧或高氧目标。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 8;384(14):1301-1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032510. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Hyperoxia in patients with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.在接受静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合支持的心肌梗死后心源性休克患者中给予高氧治疗。
Aust Crit Care. 2021 Jan;34(1):55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.04.154. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Liberal or Conservative Oxygen Therapy for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的自由或保守氧疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 12;382(11):999-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916431.
8
Conservative Oxygen Therapy during Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU.ICU 机械通气时的保守氧疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 12;382(11):989-998. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903297. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
9
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
Oxygen Thresholds and Mortality During Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult Patients.成年患者体外生命支持期间的氧阈值与死亡率
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):1997-2005. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002643.