Clinical Effectiveness of Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared With Hemiarthroplasty in Adults Undergoing Surgery for Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fracture: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends offering total hip arthroplasty (THA) over hemiarthroplasty (HA) for displaced intracapsular hip fractures, taking the premorbid functionality, present co-morbidities, and functional benefit beyond two years into account. Concerns remain whether the higher surgical burden and incidence of complications in THA would outweigh the potential benefits in the elderly.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study evaluates the differences in surgical outcomes of THA vs HA in 85 patients with displaced intracapsular fractures, based on the time taken for patients to ambulate to walking frame/crutches and wheelchair post-operatively and the incidence of post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Patients who received HA were significantly older (p<0.0001, <0.05) and had poorer pre-operative ambulatory function (p=0.032, p<0.05) than those of the THA group. HA patients had a significantly faster recovery to walking frame/crutches (20.2 days) compared to THA patients (47.3 days) (Mann-Whitney U=447.500, n=46, p=0.043, <0.05 two-tailed). While no significant differences were found in deep vein thrombosis (DVT), infected prosthesis, or dislocation incidence, hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) was more prevalent in THA patients (p=0.044, <0.05). Time to the walking frame had a significant effect on DVT/PE (p<0.001, <p0.05), the infected prosthesis (p=0.002, <0.05), and HAP (p=0.066, <0.05) incidence, while time to a wheelchair only affected HAP incidence (p<0.001, <0.05).

CONCLUSION

HA patients showed favourable outcomes in time to ambulate post-operatively and incidence of HAP among patients with advanced age and those with poorer pre-operative ambulatory function.