Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9BU, UK.
Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Level 1, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 17;20(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2590-4.
Displaced intracapsular hip fractures are typically treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). A number of professional bodies recommend considering THA for patients that were independently mobile and cognitively intact before injury. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between HA and THA for independently mobile older adults with hip fractures.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was undertaken alongside analysis of a propensity score matched national cohort of older adults (aged > 60) with hip fractures. Participants were identified for the propensity score matched cohort from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), which was linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and civil death registration data. The primary outcomes were 12-month dislocation, revision, and mortality. The secondary outcomes were length of stay, discharge home, unplanned re-admission, functional outcomes, and health-related quality of life.
Five RCTs reported higher THA dislocation but this was not statistically significant (THA risk ratio [RR] 2.77, 95% CI 0.81 to 9.48). However, THA dislocation was significantly higher in the national observational dataset (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.73, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.41). Meta-analysis of data from four RCTs did not identify a significant difference in terms of revision (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.56 to 4.14). However, THA revision was significantly lower in the national dataset (SHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.90). Meta-analysis of data from 5 RCTs suggested higher mortality amongst patients undergoing HA (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.04), which was also observed within the national registry dataset (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.54).
National clinical registries can provide important context when interpreting RCT data, which may alone be inadequate for comparing the safety profile of surgical interventions. These data suggest that THA is at significantly higher risk of dislocation but lower risk of revision within 12 months. The finding from both RCT and clinical registry data that THA is associated with lower 12-month mortality amongst the fittest patients with hip fractures requires urgent further study to determine whether or not this can be replicated in other balanced populations.
囊内移位性髋关节骨折通常采用半髋关节置换术(HA)或全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗。许多专业机构建议,对于受伤前独立活动且认知功能正常的患者,考虑采用 THA。本研究旨在比较髋关节骨折的独立活动的老年患者中 HA 和 THA 的治疗结果。
对随机对照试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,并对年龄>60 岁的髋关节骨折老年患者的倾向评分匹配全国队列进行分析。从国家髋关节骨折数据库(NHFD)中识别出倾向评分匹配队列的参与者,该数据库与医院发病统计数据(HES)和民事死亡登记数据相关联。主要结局为 12 个月时的脱位、翻修和死亡率。次要结局为住院时间、出院回家、非计划再入院、功能结局和健康相关生活质量。
五项 RCT 报告 THA 脱位率较高,但无统计学意义(THA 风险比 [RR] 2.77,95%CI 0.81 至 9.48)。然而,全国观察性数据集的 THA 脱位率显著更高(亚分布风险比 [SHR] 1.73,95%CI 1.24 至 2.41)。四项 RCT 的数据荟萃分析未发现翻修方面有显著差异(RR 1.52,95%CI 0.56 至 4.14)。然而,全国数据集的 THA 翻修率显著较低(SHR 0.66,95%CI 0.48 至 0.90)。五项 RCT 的数据荟萃分析表明,接受 HA 治疗的患者死亡率较高(RR 0.63,95%CI 0.38 至 1.04),这也在全国登记数据集(风险比 0.45,95%CI 0.37 至 0.54)中观察到。
国家临床登记处可以为解释 RCT 数据提供重要背景,而仅 RCT 数据可能不足以比较手术干预的安全性。这些数据表明,THA 的脱位风险明显更高,但在 12 个月内翻修的风险较低。RCT 和临床登记处数据都表明,THA 与最适合髋关节骨折患者的 12 个月内死亡率较低相关,这需要进一步紧急研究以确定这是否可以在其他平衡人群中复制。