Department of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 1;81(2):157-166. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3985.
Stimulants (methylphenidate and amphetamines) are often prescribed at unlicensed doses for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Whether dose escalation beyond US Food and Drug Administration recommendations is associated with positive risk benefits is unclear.
To investigate the impact, based on averages, of stimulant doses on treatment outcomes in adults with ADHD and to determine, based on averages, whether unlicensed doses are associated with positive risk benefits compared with licensed doses.
Twelve databases, including published (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Sciences) and unpublished (ClinicalTrials.gov) literature, up to February 22, 2023, without language restrictions.
Two researchers independently screened records to identify double-blinded randomized clinical trials of stimulants against placebo in adults (18 years and older) with ADHD.
Aggregate data were extracted and synthesized in random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and network meta-analyses.
Change in ADHD symptoms and discontinuations due to adverse events.
A total of 47 randomized clinical trials (7714 participants; mean age, 35 (SD, 11) years; 4204 male [56%]) were included. For methylphenidate, dose-response curves indicated additional reductions of symptoms with increments in doses, but the gains were progressively smaller and accompanied by continued additional risk of adverse events dropouts. Network meta-analyses showed that unlicensed doses were associated with greater reductions of symptoms compared with licensed doses (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.23; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.02; very low certainty of evidence), but the additional gain was small and accompanied by increased risk of adverse event dropouts (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.19-3.43; moderate certainty of evidence). For amphetamines, the dose-response curve approached a plateau and increments in doses did not indicate additional reductions of symptoms, but there were continued increments in the risk of adverse event dropouts. Network meta-analysis did not identify differences between unlicensed and licensed doses for reductions of symptoms (SMD, -0.08; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.08; very low certainty of evidence).
Based on group averages, unlicensed doses of stimulants may not have positive risk benefits compared with licensed doses for adults with ADHD. In general, practitioners should consider unlicensed doses cautiously. Practitioners may trial unlicensed doses if needed and tolerated but should be aware that there may not be large gains in the response to the medication with those further increments in dose. However, the findings are averages and will not generalize to every patient.
兴奋剂(哌醋甲酯和苯丙胺)经常在未经许可的剂量下开给患有注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人。目前尚不清楚剂量超过美国食品和药物管理局建议是否与积极的风险效益有关。
基于平均值,调查兴奋剂剂量对 ADHD 成年患者治疗结果的影响,并确定与许可剂量相比,未经许可的剂量是否与积极的风险效益相关。
12 个数据库,包括已发表(PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Sciences)和未发表(ClinicalTrials.gov)文献,截至 2023 年 2 月 22 日,无语言限制。
两名研究人员独立筛选记录,以确定在 ADHD 成年患者(18 岁及以上)中,兴奋剂与安慰剂相比的双盲随机临床试验。
在随机效应剂量反应荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析中提取和综合汇总数据。
ADHD 症状的变化和因不良事件而停药。
共纳入 47 项随机临床试验(7714 名参与者;平均年龄 35(SD,11)岁;4204 名男性[56%])。对于哌醋甲酯,剂量-反应曲线表明随着剂量的增加,症状进一步减轻,但收益逐渐减小,同时不良反应(停药)的风险持续增加。网络荟萃分析显示,与许可剂量相比,未经许可的剂量与症状的更大减轻相关(标准化均数差[SMD],-0.23;95%CI,-0.44 至-0.02;证据确定性极低),但额外的收益较小,同时不良反应(停药)的风险增加(比值比,2.02;95%CI,1.19-3.43;证据确定性中度)。对于安非他命,剂量-反应曲线接近平台,增加剂量并不能表明症状进一步减轻,但不良反应(停药)的风险持续增加。网络荟萃分析未发现未经许可的剂量与许可剂量在减轻症状方面的差异(SMD,-0.08;95%CI,-0.24 至 0.08;证据确定性极低)。
基于组平均值,与许可剂量相比,兴奋剂未经许可的剂量可能对 ADHD 成年患者没有积极的风险效益。一般来说,从业者应谨慎考虑未经许可的剂量。如果需要且耐受,从业者可以尝试未经许可的剂量,但应注意,随着剂量的进一步增加,药物的反应可能不会有很大的改善。然而,这些发现是平均值,不会推广到每个患者。