Rikken G L J A, Avarvari N
Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses UPR3228 CNRS/EMFL/INSA/UGA/UPS, 31400/38042 Toulouse/Grenoble, France.
Université Angers, CNRS, MOLTECH-Anjou SFR MATRIX, F-49000 Angers, France.
J Phys Chem Lett. 2023 Nov 2;14(43):9727-9731. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02546. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
The combination of chirality and magnetism has steadily grown over the past decennia into an area of intense research that evolves around two distinct manifestations and in two nonoverlapping communities: electrical magnetochiral anisotropy (eMChA) and chirality-induced spin-selectivity (CISS). Here, we discuss the similarities and differences of these two effects. Whereas the original CISS reports suggest an intimate relation with eMChA, magnetoresistance (MR) results on two-terminal chiral devices attributed to CISS have symmetry properties that are different from those of eMChA. At the same time, the magnitudes of CISS MR and eMChA turn out to be similar when normalized to current density and spin polarization, suggesting a common underlying mechanism.
在过去十年中,手性与磁性的结合已稳步发展成为一个研究热点领域,围绕两种不同表现形式并在两个不重叠的群体中展开:电磁手性各向异性(eMChA)和手性诱导自旋选择性(CISS)。在此,我们讨论这两种效应的异同。尽管最初的CISS报告表明其与eMChA存在密切关系,但归因于CISS的两终端手性器件的磁电阻(MR)结果具有与eMChA不同的对称性质。同时,当按电流密度和自旋极化进行归一化时,CISS MR和eMChA的大小相似,这表明存在共同的潜在机制。