PhD, RN, Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, National Tainan Junior College of Nursing, Tainan, Taiwan.
PhD, RN, Professor, Institute of Clinical Nursing, College of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Nurs Res. 2023 Dec 1;31(6):e301. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000578.
Exercise interventions can promote health, but they can be difficult to implement. Moreover, no consensus has been reached regarding which exercise modality promotes the most significant improvement in metabolic health.
This feasibility study was conducted to (a) determine the implementation efficacy of supervised and home-based exercise interventions by investigating their respective rates of intervention adherence, adherence to targeted intensity, attrition, and adverse events and (b) explore the preliminary efficacy of 12-week exercise programs among aerobic exercise, aerobic exercise combined with resistance exercise, and high-intensity interval training on body composition, anthropometric parameters, and lipid profiles for community-dwelling residents with physical inactivity.
This randomized controlled trial was conducted from April to October 2020. Seventy-two sedentary participants aged 40-70 years were enrolled and randomized into one of four groups: 12-week aerobic exercise, aerobic exercise combined with resistance exercise, high-intensity interval training, and control. The three exercise groups performed at least moderate-intensity supervised exercise twice a week and home-based exercise once a week, whereas the control group maintained their usual daily activities. The target variables, including body composition, anthropometric parameters, and lipid profiles, were measured before and after the 12-week intervention.
The intervention adherence rates were 74.01%-87.54% for the supervised exercise group, 64.98%-83.90% for the home-based exercise group, and 82.65%-92.65% for the target exercise intensity group. The attrition rate ranged from 12.50% to 17.65%, and no adverse events were reported in any of the exercise groups. Preliminary efficacy data show the reductions in body weight (95% CI [0.01, 1.20], p = .048) and low-density lipoprotein (95% CI [2.76, 30.32], p = .02) were greater in the exercise groups than the control group, although the intergroup differences were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Body weight and low-density lipoprotein may be efficiently reduced in a 12-week period using any of the three exercise modalities with at least 82.65% adherence to moderate-intensity exercise and 70.84% adherence to exercising 3 times a week.
运动干预可以促进健康,但实施起来可能具有一定难度。此外,对于哪种运动方式最能改善代谢健康,目前尚未达成共识。
本可行性研究旨在:(a)通过调查各自的干预依从率、目标强度依从率、脱落率和不良事件,确定监督和家庭运动干预的实施效果;(b)探索有氧、有氧结合抗阻和高强度间歇训练 12 周运动方案对社区中缺乏运动的居民身体成分、人体测量参数和血脂的初步效果。
本随机对照试验于 2020 年 4 月至 10 月进行。共纳入 72 名年龄在 40-70 岁之间的久坐参与者,并随机分为 4 组:12 周有氧组、有氧结合抗阻组、高强度间歇训练组和对照组。前 3 组每周至少进行 2 次中等强度的监督运动和 1 次家庭运动,对照组保持日常活动不变。在 12 周干预前后测量了包括身体成分、人体测量参数和血脂谱在内的靶变量。
监督运动组的干预依从率为 74.01%-87.54%,家庭运动组为 64.98%-83.90%,目标运动强度组为 82.65%-92.65%。脱落率在 12.50%-17.65%之间,任何运动组均未报告不良事件。初步疗效数据显示,与对照组相比,运动组的体重(95%CI [0.01, 1.20],p =.048)和低密度脂蛋白(95%CI [2.76, 30.32],p =.02)降低更显著,尽管组间差异无统计学意义。
结论/对实践的影响:在 12 周内,通过任何 3 种运动方式中的任何一种,达到至少 82.65%的中等强度运动依从率和每周运动 3 次的 70.84%的目标强度,体重和低密度脂蛋白可能会有效降低。