From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Av. Sant Joan de Deu 2, CP 08950 Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain (E.J.I.C.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.D.L., S.P.K., R.R.) and Children Skin Center (A.M.D.), Miami Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla; and Ross University School of Medicine, Miramar, Fla (T.R.M.).
Radiographics. 2023 Nov;43(11):e230064. doi: 10.1148/rg.230064.
Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common neoplasm in children, but it may mimic other types of vascular anomalies or nonvascular benign and malignant tumors. In most cases, the clinical appearance, time of onset, and pattern of involution facilitate its diagnosis. Imaging evaluation is not always needed since the IH features at clinical presentation are usually characteristic, but when needed, US and frequently MRI are the imaging modalities of choice. Clinical photography or photographic documentation plays a central role in monitoring these lesions over their clinical course. Photographic documentation can also add confidence and alert the radiologist when interpreting imaging studies. Some vascular anomalies, especially vascular malformations, are a frequent source of confusion, as these may resemble IHs clinically and at imaging. The lack of uniform terminology also hinders an accurate diagnosis. To unify the terminology and minimize confusion, the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies created a helpful classification in 1994. In addition, radiologists need to be aware of and become familiar with other neoplasms in children that may resemble IH to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary procedures. Fibrous and lipomatous tumors are examples of benign tumors that can mimic IHs clinically and at imaging, whereas rhabdomyosarcoma, infantile fibrosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and lymphoproliferative disorders are examples of malignant neoplasms. The authors review the features of IH at clinical presentation and imaging evaluation, highlighting its different phases of evolution and stressing the importance of photographic documentation. The authors also review pitfalls of IH with helpful pearls for differentiation. RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Khanna and Briones in this issue.
婴儿血管瘤(IH)是儿童中最常见的肿瘤,但它可能模仿其他类型的血管异常或非血管良性和恶性肿瘤。在大多数情况下,临床外观、发病时间和消退模式有助于其诊断。由于 IH 在临床表现上的特征通常具有特征性,因此并非总是需要进行影像学评估,但在需要时,US 和经常使用的 MRI 是首选的影像学方法。临床摄影或摄影记录在监测这些病变的临床过程中起着核心作用。摄影记录在解释影像学研究时也可以增加信心并提醒放射科医生。一些血管异常,特别是血管畸形,经常引起混淆,因为这些异常在临床上和影像学上可能与 IH 相似。缺乏统一的术语也阻碍了准确的诊断。为了统一术语并减少混淆,国际血管异常研究学会于 1994 年创建了一个有用的分类。此外,放射科医生需要了解并熟悉其他可能在临床上和影像学上类似于 IH 的儿童肿瘤,以避免误诊和不必要的程序。纤维和脂肪瘤是临床上和影像学上可能模仿 IH 的良性肿瘤的例子,而横纹肌肉瘤、婴儿纤维肉瘤、神经母细胞瘤和淋巴增生性疾病则是恶性肿瘤的例子。作者回顾了 IH 在临床表现和影像学评估中的特征,强调了其不同的演化阶段,并强调了摄影记录的重要性。作者还回顾了 IH 的误区,并提供了有助于鉴别诊断的有用技巧。RSNA,2023 本文的问答测验可在补充材料中找到。请参阅本期 Khanna 和 Briones 的特邀评论。