Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Arch Oral Biol. 2024 Jan;157:105823. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105823. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled in vivo study investigating the protective potential of a titanium tetrafluoride/ sodium fluoride (TiF/NaF) solution compared to its respective positive and negative controls under an in vivo model, as well as the perception of participants regarding the use of this experimental solution.
After the ethics approval and the selection procedures, 33 participants were divided into three treatments: TiF/NaF solution (500 ppm F, pH 4.4); AmF/NaF/SnCl-mouthwash (500 ppm F, pH 4.5) and water (pH 7.0) (n = 11). After professional cleaning, the participants rinsed with one of the solutions for one minute and waited two hours for the erosive challenge. The erosive solution (1 % citric acid, pH 2.5) was applied for 10 s on each central incisor (enamel area: 4 mm) and collected for calcium analysis using III Arsenazo colorimetric method. The Ca release data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis/ Dunn tests (p < 0.05).
Teeth treated with both fluoride solutions released less calcium into the acid (median and interquartile interval: TiF/NaF - 0.45/0.19 mM and AmF/NaF/SnCl - 0.46/0.15 mM Ca, p = 0.99) compared to the negative control (1.12/0.42 mM Ca, 60 % reduction, p < 0.0006). For both F solutions, only one participant per group reported unpleasant taste. Four participants belonging to AmF/NaF/SnCl-mouthwash reported burning sensation post-rinse, while only one participant described such feeling after TiF/NaF rinsing.
The experimental TiF/NaF solution was as effective as the commercial AmF/NaF/SnCl-mouthwash in protecting enamel against erosive demineralization with a good acceptability by the participants.
本研究采用体内随机、双盲、平行、安慰剂对照试验,比较了一种钛四氟化物/氟化钠(TiF/NaF)溶液在体内模型下与其各自阳性和阴性对照的保护潜力,以及参与者对该实验溶液使用的看法。
经过伦理批准和选择程序,33 名参与者被分为三组:TiF/NaF 溶液(500 ppm F,pH 值 4.4);AmF/NaF/SnCl 漱口水(500 ppm F,pH 值 4.5)和水(pH 值 7.0)(n = 11)。在专业清洁后,参与者用其中一种溶液漱口一分钟,等待两小时进行侵蚀挑战。将腐蚀性溶液(1%柠檬酸,pH 值 2.5)应用于每颗中切牙 10 秒(牙釉质区域:4mm),并用 III 砷酸法比色法收集钙分析。使用 Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn 检验比较 Ca 释放数据(p<0.05)。
用两种氟化物溶液处理的牙齿向酸中释放的钙较少(中位数和四分位间距:TiF/NaF-0.45/0.19mM 和 AmF/NaF/SnCl-0.46/0.15mM Ca,p=0.99),与阴性对照组(1.12/0.42mM Ca,60%减少,p<0.0006)相比。对于两种 F 溶液,每组只有一名参与者报告口感不佳。属于 AmF/NaF/SnCl 漱口水组的四名参与者在漱口后报告有烧灼感,而只有一名参与者在 TiF/NaF 漱口后描述了这种感觉。
实验性 TiF/NaF 溶液与商业 AmF/NaF/SnCl 漱口水一样有效,可保护牙釉质免受侵蚀脱矿,且参与者接受度良好。