Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
The Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Cumming school of Medicine, The University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Oct 27;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02026-9.
Although recent guidelines advocate for HbA1c target individualization, a comprehensive criterion for patient categorization remains absent. This study aimed to categorize HbA1c variability levels and explore the relationship between glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across different degrees of variability.
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study data were used. HbA1c variability was measured using the HbA1c variability score (HVS) and standard deviation (SD). K-means and K-medians clustering were used to combine the HVS and SD.
K-means clustering was the most stable algorithm with the lowest clustering similarities. In the low variability group, intensive glucose-lowering treatment significantly reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (HR: 0·78 [95% CI: 0·63, 0·97]) without increasing mortality risk (HR: 1·07 [0.81, 1·42]); the risk of adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 1·33 [1·14, 1·56]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1·23 [1·01,1·51]) increased with increasing mean HbA1c. In the high variability group, treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.00 [1·54, 2·60]) and mortality (HR: 2·20 [1·66, 2·92]); a higher mean HbA1c (7·86%, [7·66%, 8·06%]) had the lowest mortality risk, when the mean HbA1c was < 7·86%, a higher mean HbA1c was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR: 0·63 [0·42, 0·95]). In the medium variability group, a mean HbA1c around 7·5% was associated with the lowest risk.
HbA1c variability can guide glycemic control targets for patients with type 2 diabetes. For patients with low variability, the lower the HbA1c, the lower the risk. For those with medium variability, controlling HbA1c at 7·5% provides the maximum benefit. For patients with high variability, a mean HbA1c of around 7·8% presents the lowest risk of all-cause mortality, a lower HbA1c did not provide cardiovascular benefits but instead increased the mortality risk. Further studies, especially those with patients that reflect the general population with type 2 diabetes undergoing the latest therapeutic approaches, are essential to validate the conclusions of this study.
尽管最近的指南主张根据糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)目标进行个体化治疗,但仍缺乏全面的患者分类标准。本研究旨在对 HbA1c 变异性水平进行分类,并探讨不同程度变异性与血糖控制、心血管结局和死亡率之间的关系。
利用 ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES 研究的数据。采用 HbA1c 变异性评分(HVS)和标准差(SD)来衡量 HbA1c 变异性。采用 K-均值和 K-中位数聚类法将 HVS 和 SD 相结合。
K-均值聚类是最稳定的算法,聚类相似度最低。在低变异性组中,强化降糖治疗显著降低了不良心血管结局的风险(HR:0.78 [95%CI:0.63,0.97]),而不增加死亡率风险(HR:1.07 [0.81,1.42]);不良心血管事件(HR:1.33 [1.14,1.56])和全因死亡率(HR:1.23 [1.01,1.51])随着平均 HbA1c 的升高而增加。在高变异性组中,治疗增加了心血管事件(HR:2.00 [1.54,2.60])和死亡率(HR:2.20 [1.66,2.92])的风险;当平均 HbA1c<7.86%时,较高的平均 HbA1c(7.86%[7.66%,8.06%])具有最低的死亡率风险,当平均 HbA1c≥7.86%时,较高的平均 HbA1c 与较低的死亡率风险相关(HR:0.63 [0.42,0.95])。在中变异性组中,平均 HbA1c 约为 7.5%时与最低风险相关。
HbA1c 变异性可以指导 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制目标。对于低变异性患者,HbA1c 越低,风险越低。对于中变异性患者,控制 HbA1c 在 7.5%可获得最大获益。对于高变异性患者,平均 HbA1c 约为 7.8%时全因死亡率最低,较低的 HbA1c 没有带来心血管获益,反而增加了死亡率风险。需要进一步研究,特别是纳入反映接受最新治疗方法的 2 型糖尿病一般人群的研究,以验证本研究的结论。