Bosshard Shannon, Walla Peter
School of Psychology, Newcastle University, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Faculty of Psychology, Freud CanBeLab, Sigmund Freud University, Sigmund Freud Platz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria.
Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 29;13(10):1393. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13101393.
The present study addresses the question of whether explicit, survey-type measures of attitude differ in sensitivity when compared to implicit, non-conscious measures of attitude in the context of attitude changes in response to evaluative conditioning (EC). In the frame of a pre-test, participants rated 300 brand names on a Likert-type scale, the results of which were then used to create personalised lists of neutral brands. After this initial online component, the participants were exposed to one, five, and ten rounds of EC (during three separate sessions), during which half of the brands were paired with pleasant audio excerpts (positive EC) and the remainder were paired with unpleasant audio excerpts (negative EC). Following each conditioning round, the participants rated the brand names again, whilst changes in the brain's electrical activity in response to the brands were recorded via electroencephalography (EEG). After having rated the brand names, the participants also completed two implicit association tests (IAT; one for each of the neutral conditions). The results revealed that self-reported, explicit responses of brand names remained unchanged despite having been conditioned. Similarly, the IAT did not reveal any declines in reaction time. In contrast, the EEG data appeared to not only be sensitive to initial brand ratings, but also the conditioning effects of initially neutral brands. Respective neurophysiological effects were found at frontal electrode locations AF3 and AF4 for a 1 s-long time window starting at 400 ms after stimulus onset. Furthermore, the EEG revealed that changes in brand attitude are more susceptible to the effects of negative conditioning than positive conditioning. Given the rather small sample size, any generalizability seems vague, but the present results provide scientific evidence that EEG could indeed be a valuable additional method to investigate EC effects. The results of this study support the notion of utilising a multidimensional approach, inclusive of neuroscience, to understanding consumer attitudes instead of solely relying on self-report measures. In the end, the brain knows more than it admits to consciousness and language, which is why objective methods should always be included in any study.
本研究探讨了在因评价性条件反射(EC)导致态度改变的背景下,与态度的隐性、非意识测量方法相比,态度的显性、调查式测量方法在敏感性上是否存在差异。在一项预测试中,参与者用李克特量表对300个品牌名称进行评分,然后将结果用于创建个性化的中性品牌列表。在这个初始的在线部分之后,参与者接受了一轮、五轮和十轮的EC(在三个单独的阶段),在此期间,一半的品牌与愉悦的音频片段配对(正向EC),其余的与不愉快的音频片段配对(负向EC)。在每一轮条件反射之后,参与者再次对品牌名称进行评分,同时通过脑电图(EEG)记录大脑对这些品牌的电活动变化。在对品牌名称进行评分之后,参与者还完成了两项内隐联想测验(IAT;每种中性条件各一项)。结果显示,尽管经过了条件反射,品牌名称的自我报告的显性反应仍保持不变。同样,IAT也未显示出反应时间有任何下降。相比之下,EEG数据似乎不仅对初始品牌评分敏感,而且对最初中性品牌的条件反射效应也敏感。在刺激开始后400毫秒开始的1秒长的时间窗口内,在额叶电极位置AF3和AF4发现了相应的神经生理效应。此外,EEG显示,品牌态度的变化对负向条件反射的影响比正向条件反射更敏感。鉴于样本量相当小,任何普遍性似乎都不明确,但目前的结果提供了科学证据,表明EEG确实可能是研究EC效应的一种有价值的补充方法。本研究的结果支持了采用包括神经科学在内的多维方法来理解消费者态度,而不是仅仅依赖自我报告测量方法的观点。最终,大脑知道的比它向意识和语言承认的要多,这就是为什么任何研究都应该始终纳入客观方法的原因。