von Gall Charlotte, Holub Leon, Pfeffer Martina, Eickhoff Simon
Institute of Anatomy II, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Brain Sci. 2023 Oct 19;13(10):1482. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13101482.
In modern society, the time and duration of sleep on workdays are primarily determined by external factors, e.g., the alarm clock. This can lead to a misalignment of the intrinsically determined sleep timing, which is dependent on the individual chronotype, resulting in reduced sleep quality. Although this is highly relevant given the high incidence of sleep disorders, little is known about the effect of this misalignment on sleep architecture. Using Fitbit trackers and questionnaire surveys, our study aims to elucidate sleep timing, sleep architecture, and subjective sleep quality in young healthy adults ( = 59) under real-life conditions (average of 82.4 ± 9.7 days). Correlations between variables were calculated to identify the direction of relationships. On workdays, the midpoint of sleep was earlier, the sleep duration was shorter, and tiredness upon waking was higher than on free days. A higher discrepancy between sleep duration on workdays and free days was associated with a lower stability of the circadian rhythm of REM sleep and also with a higher fragmentation of REM sleep. Similarly, a higher tiredness upon waking on free days, thus under intrinsically determined sleep timing conditions, was associated with a lower proportion and a higher fragmentation of REM sleep. This suggests that the misalignment between extrinsically and intrinsically determined sleep timing affects the architecture of sleep stages, particularly REM sleep, which is closely connected to sleep quality.
在现代社会,工作日的睡眠时间和时长主要由外部因素决定,例如闹钟。这可能导致内在决定的睡眠时间表与实际情况不符,而内在睡眠时间表取决于个体的昼夜节律类型,进而导致睡眠质量下降。鉴于睡眠障碍的高发病率,这一问题高度相关,但对于这种不一致对睡眠结构的影响却知之甚少。本研究使用Fitbit追踪器和问卷调查,旨在阐明年轻健康成年人(n = 59)在现实生活条件下(平均82.4 ± 9.7天)的睡眠时间、睡眠结构和主观睡眠质量。通过计算变量之间的相关性来确定关系的方向。在工作日,睡眠中点更早,睡眠时间更短,醒来时的疲劳感比休息日更高。工作日和休息日睡眠时间的差异越大,快速眼动睡眠昼夜节律的稳定性越低,快速眼动睡眠的碎片化程度也越高。同样,在休息日,即在内在决定的睡眠时间条件下,醒来时更高的疲劳感与快速眼动睡眠的比例较低和碎片化程度较高有关。这表明,外在和内在决定的睡眠时间不一致会影响睡眠阶段的结构,尤其是与睡眠质量密切相关的快速眼动睡眠。