Chu Justin, Chang Yao-Ting, Liaw Shien-Kuei, Yang Fu-Liang
Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Sec. 4, Keelung Rd., Taipei City 10607, Taiwan.
Research Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Rd., Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei City 115-29, Taiwan.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Oct 16;10(10):1207. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101207.
To reduce the error induced by overfitting or underfitting in predicting non-invasive fasting blood glucose (NIBG) levels using photoplethysmography (PPG) data alone, we previously demonstrated that incorporating HbA1c led to a notable 10% improvement in NIBG prediction accuracy (the ratio in zone A of Clarke's error grid). However, this enhancement came at the cost of requiring an additional HbA1c measurement, thus being unfriendly to users. In this study, the enhanced HbA1c NIBG deep learning model (blood glucose level predicted from PPG and HbA1c) was trained with 1494 measurements, and we replaced the HbA1c measurement (explicit HbA1c) with "implicit HbA1c" which is reversely derived from pretested PPG and finger-pricked blood glucose levels. The implicit HbA1c is then evaluated across intervals up to 90 days since the pretest, achieving an impressive 87% accuracy, while the remaining 13% falls near the CEG zone A boundary. The implicit HbA1c approach exhibits a remarkable 16% improvement over the explicit HbA1c method by covering personal correction items automatically. This improvement not only refines the accuracy of the model but also enhances the practicality of the previously proposed model that relied on an HbA1c input. The nonparametric Wilcoxon paired test conducted on the percentage error of implicit and explicit HbA1c prediction results reveals a substantial difference, with a -value of 2.75 × 10.
为减少仅使用光电容积脉搏波描记术(PPG)数据预测无创空腹血糖(NIBG)水平时因过拟合或欠拟合引起的误差,我们之前证明,纳入糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)可使NIBG预测准确率显著提高10%(克拉克误差网格A区的比例)。然而,这种提高是以需要额外测量HbA1c为代价的,因此对用户不太友好。在本研究中,增强型HbA1c NIBG深度学习模型(根据PPG和HbA1c预测血糖水平)使用1494次测量数据进行训练,我们用从预先测试的PPG和指尖血血糖水平反向推导得到的“隐式HbA1c”取代了HbA1c测量值(显式HbA1c)。然后在自预测试起长达90天的时间间隔内对隐式HbA1c进行评估,准确率达到了令人印象深刻的87%,而其余13%接近CEG A区边界。隐式HbA1c方法通过自动涵盖个人校正项目,比显式HbA1c方法有显著的16%的改进。这种改进不仅提高了模型的准确性,还增强了先前提出的依赖HbA1c输入的模型的实用性。对隐式和显式HbA1c预测结果的百分比误差进行的非参数威尔科克森配对检验显示出显著差异,p值为2.75×10。