Suppr超能文献

深度学习结合队列安排和每季度测量的 HbA1c 可实现基于光电容积脉搏波的非侵入性血糖预测准确率达 90%。

90% Accuracy for Photoplethysmography-Based Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Prediction by Deep Learning with Cohort Arrangement and Quarterly Measured HbA1c.

机构信息

Research Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Rd., Sec. 2, Nankang, Taipei City 11529, Taiwan.

Department of Biomechatronics Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 10607, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 24;21(23):7815. doi: 10.3390/s21237815.

Abstract

Previously published photoplethysmography-(PPG) based non-invasive blood glucose (NIBG) measurements have not yet been validated over 500 subjects. As illustrated in this work, we increased the number subjects recruited to 2538 and found that the prediction accuracy (the ratio in zone A of Clarke's error grid) reduced to undesirable 60.6%. We suspect the low prediction accuracy induced by larger sample size might arise from the physiological diversity of subjects, and one possibility is that the diversity might originate from medication. Therefore, we split the subjects into two cohorts for deep learning: with and without medication (1682 and 856 recruited subjects, respectively). In comparison, the cohort training for subjects without any medication had approximately 30% higher prediction accuracy over the cohort training for those with medication. Furthermore, by adding quarterly (every 3 months) measured glycohemoglobin (HbA1c), we were able to significantly boost the prediction accuracy by approximately 10%. For subjects without medication, the best performing model with quarterly measured HbA1c achieved 94.3% prediction accuracy, RMSE of 12.4 mg/dL, MAE of 8.9 mg/dL, and MAPE of 0.08, which demonstrates a very promising solution for NIBG prediction via deep learning. Regarding subjects with medication, a personalized model could be a viable means of further investigation.

摘要

先前发表的基于光电容积脉搏波(PPG)的无创血糖(NIBG)测量方法尚未在超过 500 名受试者中得到验证。正如本工作所示,我们将受试者数量增加到 2538 名,发现预测精度(Clarke 误差网格 A 区的比例)降低到不理想的 60.6%。我们怀疑较大样本量引起的低预测精度可能是由于受试者的生理多样性引起的,一种可能性是这种多样性可能源于药物治疗。因此,我们将受试者分为两个深度学习队列:有药物治疗和无药物治疗(分别招募了 1682 名和 856 名受试者)。相比之下,无任何药物治疗的受试者队列的训练预测精度比有药物治疗的受试者队列的训练预测精度高出约 30%。此外,通过添加每季度(每 3 个月)测量的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),我们能够将预测精度提高约 10%。对于无药物治疗的受试者,具有每季度测量 HbA1c 的最佳表现模型实现了 94.3%的预测精度、12.4mg/dL 的 RMSE、8.9mg/dL 的 MAE 和 0.08 的 MAPE,这表明通过深度学习进行 NIBG 预测是一种很有前途的解决方案。对于有药物治疗的受试者,个性化模型可能是进一步研究的可行方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6746/8659475/c2c81d6763bc/sensors-21-07815-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验