• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测肺癌患者护理及时性的机器学习技术

Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Timeliness of Care among Lung Cancer Patients.

作者信息

Earnest Arul, Tesema Getayeneh Antehunegn, Stirling Robert G

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;11(20):2756. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202756.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11202756
PMID:37893830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10606192/
Abstract

Delays in the assessment, management, and treatment of lung cancer patients may adversely impact prognosis and survival. This study is the first to use machine learning techniques to predict the quality and timeliness of care among lung cancer patients, utilising data from the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry (VLCR) between 2011 and 2022, in Victoria, Australia. Predictor variables included demographic, clinical, hospital, and geographical socio-economic indices. Machine learning methods such as random forests, k-nearest neighbour, neural networks, and support vector machines were implemented and evaluated using 20% out-of-sample cross validations via the area under the curve (AUC). Optimal model parameters were selected based on 10-fold cross validation. There were 11,602 patients included in the analysis. Evaluated quality indicators included, primarily, overall proportion achieving "time from referral date to diagnosis date ≤ 28 days" and proportion achieving "time from diagnosis date to first treatment date (any intent) ≤ 14 days". Results showed that the support vector machine learning methods performed well, followed by nearest neighbour, based on out-of-sample AUCs of 0.89 (in-sample = 0.99) and 0.85 (in-sample = 0.99) for the first indicator, respectively. These models can be implemented in the registry databases to help healthcare workers identify patients who may not meet these indicators prospectively and enable timely interventions.

摘要

肺癌患者评估、管理和治疗的延迟可能会对预后和生存产生不利影响。本研究首次使用机器学习技术,利用澳大利亚维多利亚州2011年至2022年维多利亚肺癌登记处(VLCR)的数据,预测肺癌患者护理的质量和及时性。预测变量包括人口统计学、临床、医院和地理社会经济指标。实施了随机森林、k近邻、神经网络和支持向量机等机器学习方法,并通过曲线下面积(AUC)使用20%的样本外交叉验证进行评估。基于10折交叉验证选择最佳模型参数。分析纳入了11602名患者。评估的质量指标主要包括达到“从转诊日期到诊断日期≤28天”的总体比例以及达到“从诊断日期到首次治疗日期(任何意图)≤14天”的比例。结果表明,基于第一个指标的样本外AUC分别为0.89(样本内=0.99)和0.85(样本内=0.99),支持向量机学习方法表现良好,其次是最近邻方法。这些模型可以在登记数据库中实施,以帮助医护人员前瞻性地识别可能不符合这些指标的患者,并及时进行干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad3/10606192/7c38e2cc002b/healthcare-11-02756-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad3/10606192/21846a16ba82/healthcare-11-02756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad3/10606192/46cd861f2338/healthcare-11-02756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad3/10606192/7c38e2cc002b/healthcare-11-02756-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad3/10606192/21846a16ba82/healthcare-11-02756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad3/10606192/46cd861f2338/healthcare-11-02756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad3/10606192/7c38e2cc002b/healthcare-11-02756-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Timeliness of Care among Lung Cancer Patients.预测肺癌患者护理及时性的机器学习技术
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;11(20):2756. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202756.
2
Prediction of postoperative complications after oesophagectomy using machine-learning methods.应用机器学习方法预测食管癌手术后并发症。
Br J Surg. 2023 Sep 6;110(10):1361-1366. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad181.
3
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
4
Use of machine learning to predict early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted prostatectomy.应用机器学习预测机器人辅助前列腺切除术术后早期生化复发。
BJU Int. 2019 Jan;123(1):51-57. doi: 10.1111/bju.14477. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
5
A Machine Learning-Based Approach to Predict Prognosis and Length of Hospital Stay in Adults and Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: Retrospective Cohort Study.基于机器学习的方法预测成人和儿童创伤性脑损伤患者的预后和住院时间:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 9;24(12):e41819. doi: 10.2196/41819.
6
Machine learning approaches for prediction of early death among lung cancer patients with bone metastases using routine clinical characteristics: An analysis of 19,887 patients.利用常规临床特征预测肺癌伴骨转移患者早期死亡的机器学习方法:对 19887 例患者的分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;10:1019168. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1019168. eCollection 2022.
7
Timeliness of cancer care in a regional Victorian health service: A comparison of high-volume (Lung) and low-volume (oesophagogastric) tumour streams.维多利亚州区域性卫生服务机构中癌症治疗的及时性:高容量(肺部)和低容量(食管胃)肿瘤患者的比较。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Feb;4(1):e1301. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1301. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
9
A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.长期护理机构中老年人身体约束的风险预测模型:机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 6;25:e43815. doi: 10.2196/43815.
10
Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?机器学习算法能否预测丹麦膝关节置换登记处的早期翻修 TKA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2088-2101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001343.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of machine learning algorithms for lung cancer prediction: a comparative approach.机器学习算法在肺癌预测中的性能:一种对比方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 9;14(1):18562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58345-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a Multilevel Model to Identify Patients at Risk for Delay in Starting Cancer Treatment.开发一个多层次模型,以识别癌症治疗开始延迟风险的患者。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328712. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28712.
2
Interoperable and explainable machine learning models to predict morbidity and mortality in acute neurological injury in the pediatric intensive care unit: secondary analysis of the TOPICC study.用于预测儿科重症监护病房急性神经损伤发病率和死亡率的可互操作且可解释的机器学习模型:TOPICC研究的二次分析
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 28;11:1177470. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1177470. eCollection 2023.
3
Construction of the XGBoost model for early lung cancer prediction based on metabolic indices.
基于代谢指标的早期肺癌预测 XGBoost 模型的构建。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jun 13;23(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02171-x.
4
Clinical model of pulmonary metastasis in patients with osteosarcoma: A new multiple machine learning-based risk prediction.基于多种机器学习的骨肉瘤肺转移临床模型:一种新的风险预测方法。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2023 May-Aug;31(2):10225536231177102. doi: 10.1177/10225536231177102.
5
Benchmarking machine learning approaches to predict radiation-induced toxicities in lung cancer patients.用于预测肺癌患者辐射诱导毒性的机器学习方法基准测试
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023 May 19;41:100640. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100640. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Deep learning to estimate lung disease mortality from chest radiographs.深度学习估计胸片中肺部疾病的死亡率。
Nat Commun. 2023 May 16;14(1):2797. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37758-5.
7
A deep learning-based cancer survival time classifier for small datasets.基于深度学习的小数据集癌症生存时间分类器。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Jun;160:106896. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106896. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Unravelling the predictors of late cancer presentation and diagnosis in Jordan: a cross-sectional study of patients with lung and colorectal cancers.揭示约旦晚期癌症就诊和诊断的预测因素:一项肺癌和结直肠癌患者的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 2;13(5):e069529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069529.
9
Factors influencing the timeliness of care for patients with lung cancer in Bangladesh.影响孟加拉国肺癌患者护理及时性的因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09154-8.
10
Efficient Model for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis: A Comparative Study of Several Machine Learning Algorithms.用于冠心病诊断的高效模型:几种机器学习算法的比较研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Oct 18;2022:5359540. doi: 10.1155/2022/5359540. eCollection 2022.