Nelson Catherine E, Aramouni Fadi M, Goering Mikayla J, Bortoluzzi Eduarda M, Knapp Laura A, Herrera-Ibata Diana M, Li Ka Wang, Jermoumi Rabia, Hooker Jane A, Sturek Joshua, Byrd James P, Wu Hui, Trinetta Valentina, Alloosh Mouhamad, Sturek Michael, Jaberi-Douraki Majid, Hulbert Lindsey E
Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Resource Services Center for Grain and Animal Research, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Oct 18;13(20):3253. doi: 10.3390/ani13203253.
Ossabaw pigs (n = 11; 5-gilts, 6-barrows; age 15.6 ± 0.62 SD months) were exposed to a three-choice preference maze to evaluate preference for fermented sorghum teas (FSTs). After conditioning, pigs were exposed, in four sessions, to choices of white FST, sumac FST, and roasted sumac-FST. Then, pigs were exposed, in three sessions, to choices of deionized HO (-control; avoidance), isocaloric control (+control; deionized HO and sucrose), and blended FST (3Tea) (equal portions: white, sumac, and roasted sumac). When tea type was evaluated, no clear preference behaviors for tea type were observed ( > 0.10). When the 3Tea and controls were evaluated, pigs consumed minimal control ( < 0.01;18.0 ± 2.21% SEM), and they consumed great but similar volumes of +control and 3Tea (96.6 and 99.0 ± 2.21% SEM, respectively). Likewise, head-in-bowl duration was the least for -control, but 3Tea was the greatest ( < 0.01; 5.6 and 31.9 ± 1.87% SEM, respectively). Head-in-bowl duration for +control was less than 3Tea ( < 0.01; 27.6 vs. 31.9 ± 1.87% SEM). Exploration duration was the greatest in the area with the -control ( < 0.01; 7.1 ± 1.45% SEM), but 3Tea and +control exploration were not different from each other (1.4 and 3.0 ± 1.45% SEM, respectively). Regardless of tea type, adult pigs show preference for FST, even over +control. Adult pigs likely prefer the complexity of flavors, rather than the sweetness alone.
奥萨巴猪(n = 11;5头小母猪,6头阉猪;年龄15.6 ± 0.62标准差月)被置于一个三选一偏好迷宫中,以评估其对发酵高粱茶(FST)的偏好。适应环境后,猪在四个试验阶段中面临白色FST、漆树FST和烤漆树FST的选择。然后,猪在三个试验阶段中面临去离子水(-对照;回避)、等热量对照(+对照;去离子水和蔗糖)和混合FST(3茶)(等量:白色、漆树和烤漆树)的选择。在评估茶的类型时,未观察到对茶类型的明显偏好行为(>0.10)。在评估3茶和对照时,猪对对照的摄入量极少(<0.01;平均标准误为18.0 ± 2.21%),而它们对+对照和3茶的摄入量很大且相似(分别为96.6和99.0 ± 2.21%平均标准误)。同样,在碗中停留的时间,-对照最短,但3茶最长(<0.01;分别为5.6和31.9 ± 1.87%平均标准误)。+对照在碗中停留的时间比3茶短(<0.01;27.6对31.9 ± 1.87%平均标准误)。在-对照区域的探索时间最长(<0.01;平均标准误为7.1 ± 1.45%),但3茶和+对照的探索时间彼此无差异(分别为1.4和3.0 ± 1.45%平均标准误)。无论茶的类型如何,成年猪都表现出对FST的偏好,甚至超过+对照。成年猪可能更喜欢风味的复杂性,而不仅仅是甜味。