• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

豌豆珠试验作为嗅觉功能障碍筛查工具的初步研究

The PEA Bead Test as a Screening Tool for Olfactory Dysfunction: A Preliminary Study.

作者信息

Kim Kyung Soo, Kwak Il-Youp, Min Hyun Jin

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06973, Republic of Korea.

Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06973, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;13(10):2074. doi: 10.3390/life13102074.

DOI:10.3390/life13102074
PMID:37895455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10608016/
Abstract

This study, conducted in a single tertiary hospital, aimed to evaluate the 2-phenylethyl alcohol (PEA)-based sniffing bead test as a screening tool for olfactory dysfunction suitable for implementation in otorhinolaryngology and other settings, including general practice clinics. A total of 139 patients were enrolled, all of whom underwent both the PEA bead test and conventional psychophysical olfactory function testing. Characteristics such as age, sex, concurrent diseases, smoking history, and presence of gustatory dysfunction were reviewed. Statistical analyses included receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve determination, and multivariate linear regression guided by the Akaike information criterion. Significant correlations were found between the PEA bead test and various subsets of the conventional YSK olfactory function test: threshold (r = 0.631), discrimination (r = 0.455), and identification (r = 0.596), as well as the composite threshold-discrimination-identification score (r = 0.686). These correlations remained significant even when adjusting for other clinical characteristics. The PEA bead test showed a sensitivity of 0.778 and a specificity of 0.958 for discriminating olfactory dysfunction at a cutoff value of ≥1. These findings indicate that the PEA bead test could be a valuable screening tool for olfactory dysfunction across diverse clinical settings. Further large-scale, multicenter research is recommended to confirm these preliminary results.

摘要

本研究在一家三级医院开展,旨在评估基于2-苯乙醇(PEA)的嗅珠试验作为嗅觉功能障碍筛查工具的效果,该工具适用于耳鼻喉科及其他场所,包括全科诊所。共纳入139例患者,所有患者均接受了PEA嗅珠试验和传统的心理物理学嗅觉功能测试。对患者的年龄、性别、并发疾病、吸烟史以及味觉功能障碍情况等特征进行了审查。统计分析包括受试者工作特征曲线分析、曲线下面积测定以及以赤池信息准则为指导的多元线性回归。结果发现,PEA嗅珠试验与传统YSK嗅觉功能测试的各个子项之间存在显著相关性:阈值(r = 0.631)、辨别力(r = 0.455)和识别力(r = 0.596),以及阈值-辨别力-识别力综合评分(r = 0.686)。即使在对其他临床特征进行调整后,这些相关性仍然显著。在截断值≥1时,PEA嗅珠试验对嗅觉功能障碍的辨别灵敏度为0.778,特异度为0.958。这些发现表明,PEA嗅珠试验可能是一种适用于多种临床环境的、有价值的嗅觉功能障碍筛查工具。建议开展进一步的大规模、多中心研究以证实这些初步结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/10608016/833101cc687b/life-13-02074-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/10608016/005d5b3c1437/life-13-02074-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/10608016/04a255fd2201/life-13-02074-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/10608016/833101cc687b/life-13-02074-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/10608016/005d5b3c1437/life-13-02074-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/10608016/04a255fd2201/life-13-02074-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/10608016/833101cc687b/life-13-02074-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The PEA Bead Test as a Screening Tool for Olfactory Dysfunction: A Preliminary Study.豌豆珠试验作为嗅觉功能障碍筛查工具的初步研究
Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;13(10):2074. doi: 10.3390/life13102074.
2
The sniffing bead system, an olfactory dysfunction screening tool for geriatric subjects: a cross-sectional study.嗅珠系统,一种用于老年受试者嗅觉功能障碍筛查的工具:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01871-7.
3
Validation of Olfactory Questionnaire in Koreans: an Alternative for Conventional Psychophysical Olfactory Tests.《嗅觉问卷在韩国人群中的验证:对传统心理物理学嗅觉测试的一种替代》
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Feb 8;36(6):e34. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e34.
4
The effect of olfactory training on odor identification in patients with traumatic anosmia.嗅觉训练对创伤性嗅觉缺失患者气味识别的影响。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Nov;9(11):1244-1251. doi: 10.1002/alr.22409. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
5
The effect of olfactory training on the odor threshold in patients with traumatic anosmia.嗅觉训练对创伤性嗅觉丧失患者气味阈值的影响。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2017 Sep 1;31(5):317-322. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4466.
6
Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.测定反鼻音嗅觉阈值。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1608-1614. doi: 10.1002/lary.29395. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
7
Development of a Digital Olfactory Function Test: A Preliminary Study.数字嗅觉功能测试的开发:一项初步研究。
Life (Basel). 2024 Jan 2;14(1):75. doi: 10.3390/life14010075.
8
Predictive significance of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders-negative statements for olfactory loss in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.嗅觉障碍阴性陈述问卷对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者嗅觉丧失的预测意义。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov;279(11):5253-5262. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07438-z. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
9
[Clinical application of Sniffin' Sticks olfactory psychophysical measurements].[嗅觉棒嗅觉心理物理学测量的临床应用]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;48(9):741-5.
10
Gustatory dysfunction in patients with olfactory dysfunction and the associated factors.嗅觉功能障碍患者的味觉障碍及相关因素。
Rhinology. 2022 Jun 1;60(3):200-206. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.309.

本文引用的文献

1
Applicability of Sniffin' Sticks Identification Test as a Screening Tool for Olfactory Dysfunction in Northeast China.《嗅探棒嗅觉识别测试在东北地区嗅觉功能障碍筛查中的应用》
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Jan 14;29:e938903. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938903.
2
Development and Psychometric Validation of the Taste And Smell Tool for Evaluation (TASTE) Questionnaire.味觉和嗅觉评估工具(TASTE)问卷的编制及心理测量学验证。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec 1;148(12):1164-1172. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3392.
3
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.
国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:嗅觉。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929.
4
Cultural Adaptation of the Iranian Version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" Olfactory Test.伊朗版“嗅觉棒”嗅觉测试的文化适应性
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Nov 17;35:153. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.153. eCollection 2021.
5
Clinical assessment of olfactory function.嗅觉功能的临床评估。
Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab053.
6
COVID-19 related olfactory dysfunction.与 COVID-19 相关的嗅觉功能障碍。
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Feb 1;30(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000783.
7
Prognostic value of olfactory evoked potentials in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction.感染后嗅觉功能障碍患者嗅觉诱发电位的预后价值。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Oct;278(10):3839-3846. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06683-y. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Validation of Olfactory Questionnaire in Koreans: an Alternative for Conventional Psychophysical Olfactory Tests.《嗅觉问卷在韩国人群中的验证:对传统心理物理学嗅觉测试的一种替代》
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Feb 8;36(6):e34. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e34.
9
Human olfactory dysfunction: causes and consequences.人类嗅觉功能障碍:病因与后果。
Cell Tissue Res. 2021 Jan;383(1):569-579. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03381-9. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
10
The sniffing bead system, an olfactory dysfunction screening tool for geriatric subjects: a cross-sectional study.嗅珠系统,一种用于老年受试者嗅觉功能障碍筛查的工具:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01871-7.