Suppr超能文献

腕戴式传感器在应激驾驶环境中心率变异性和皮肤电活动检测的验证。

Wrist-Worn Sensor Validation for Heart Rate Variability and Electrodermal Activity Detection in a Stressful Driving Environment.

机构信息

Scientific Institute I.R.C.C.S. "E. Medea", 23842 Bosisio Parini, Italy.

Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing, National Research Council of Italy, 23900 Lecco, Italy.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;23(20):8423. doi: 10.3390/s23208423.

Abstract

Wearable sensors are widely used to gather psychophysiological data in the laboratory and real-world applications. However, the accuracy of these devices should be carefully assessed. The study focused on testing the accuracy of the Empatica 4 (E4) wristband for the detection of heart rate variability (HRV) and electrodermal activity (EDA) metrics in stress-inducing conditions and growing-risk driving scenarios. Fourteen healthy subjects were recruited for the experimental campaign, where HRV and EDA were recorded over six experimental conditions (Baseline, Video Clip, Scream, No-Risk Driving, Low-Risk Driving, and High-Risk Driving) and by means of two measurement systems: the E4 device and a gold standard system. The overall quality of the E4 data was investigated; agreement and reliability were assessed by performing a Bland-Altman analysis and by computing the Spearman's correlation coefficient. HRV time-domain parameters reported high reliability levels in Baseline (r > 0.72), Video Clip (r > 0.71), and No-Risk Driving (r > 0.67), while HRV frequency domain parameters were sufficient in Baseline (r > 0.58), Video Clip (r > 0.59), No-Risk (r > 0.51), and Low-Risk Driving (r > 0.52). As for the EDA parameters, no correlation was found. Further studies could enhance the HRV and EDA quality through further optimizations of the acquisition protocol and improvement of the processing algorithms.

摘要

可穿戴传感器广泛应用于实验室和真实应用场景中,以收集心理生理数据。然而,这些设备的准确性应仔细评估。本研究专注于测试 Empatica 4(E4)腕带在应激诱导条件和成长风险驾驶场景下检测心率变异性(HRV)和皮肤电活动(EDA)指标的准确性。招募了 14 名健康受试者参加实验,在六个实验条件(基线、视频剪辑、尖叫、无风险驾驶、低风险驾驶和高风险驾驶)下,通过两种测量系统(E4 设备和黄金标准系统)记录 HRV 和 EDA。调查了 E4 数据的整体质量,通过进行 Bland-Altman 分析和计算 Spearman 相关系数评估了一致性和可靠性。HRV 时域参数在基线(r > 0.72)、视频剪辑(r > 0.71)和无风险驾驶(r > 0.67)中报告了较高的可靠性水平,而 HRV 频域参数在基线(r > 0.58)、视频剪辑(r > 0.59)、无风险(r > 0.51)和低风险驾驶(r > 0.52)中足够。至于 EDA 参数,没有发现相关性。进一步的研究可以通过进一步优化采集协议和改进处理算法来提高 HRV 和 EDA 的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e37/10611310/965a602f5067/sensors-23-08423-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验