Latto R
Behav Brain Res. 1986 Oct;22(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90079-3.
Macaque monkeys with bilateral lesions of either the frontal eye-fields (Area 8) or the inferior parietal lobule (Area 7a or PG) were compared with unoperated controls on their ability to perform a series of 8 pre-operatively learnt visual discriminations. Simple non-spatial discriminations were not affected, but the frontal group was affected when the stimuli in a shape discrimination varied in position from trial to trial and the parietal group was impaired on the judgement of centre. Both groups were impaired on a spatial landmark test which used luminous stimuli presented in the dark, in positions that varied randomly with respect to the monkey so that only allocentric cues were available. Postoperative trial-by-trial error analysis on the landmark test showed that, whereas spatial discriminability was a factor in determining the performance of the experimental groups, degree of cue-response separation and response perseveration were not. A comparison of the performance of the two groups on all 8 tests suggests that although both are impaired on spatial discriminations, the frontal eye-fields are concerned with spatially organising responses to explore the environment, while the inferior parietal lobule is concerned more directly with the processing of spatial information and the perception of spatial relationships.
将额叶眼区(第8区)或顶下小叶(第7a区或PG区)双侧损伤的猕猴与未手术的对照组进行比较,观察它们执行一系列术前学会的视觉辨别任务的能力。简单的非空间辨别不受影响,但在形状辨别中,当每次试验的刺激位置发生变化时,额叶组受到影响,而顶叶组在中心判断上受损。在一项空间地标测试中,两组均受损,该测试使用在黑暗中呈现的发光刺激,其位置相对于猴子随机变化,因此只有以自我为中心的线索可用。地标测试的术后逐次试验错误分析表明,虽然空间可辨别性是决定实验组表现的一个因素,但线索-反应分离程度和反应持续性不是。两组在所有8项测试中的表现比较表明,虽然两组在空间辨别上均受损,但额叶眼区与为探索环境而进行的空间反应组织有关,而顶下小叶则更直接地与空间信息处理和空间关系感知有关。