• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethical and legal implications of implementing risk algorithms for early detection and screening for oesophageal cancer, now and in the future.实施风险算法进行食管癌早期检测和筛查的伦理和法律影响,现在和未来。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 30;18(10):e0293576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293576. eCollection 2023.
2
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
3
Should patients with Barrett's oesophagus be kept under surveillance? The case for.患有巴雷特食管的患者是否应接受监测?支持的理由。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(4):721-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2008.03.002.
4
Risk factors and populations at risk: selection of patients for screening for Barrett's oesophagus.危险因素及高危人群:巴雷特食管筛查患者的选择
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;29(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
5
Research priority setting in Barrett's oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.巴雷特食管和胃食管反流病的研究重点。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;2(11):824-831. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30250-9. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
Cost considerations in implementing a screening and surveillance strategy for Barrett's oesophagus.实施巴雷特食管筛查与监测策略的成本考量
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;29(1):51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
7
Barrett's oesophagus: epidemiology, cancer risk and implications for management.巴雷特食管:流行病学、癌症风险及管理意义。
Gut. 2014 Jan;63(1):191-202. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305490. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
8
Length of Barrett's oesophagus and cancer risk: implications from a large sample of patients with early oesophageal adenocarcinoma.巴雷特食管长度与癌症风险:来自一大群早期食管腺癌患者的启示。
Gut. 2016 Feb;65(2):196-201. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309220. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
9
Should patients with Barrett's oesophagus be kept under surveillance? The case against.巴雷特食管患者是否应接受监测?反对的理由。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(4):741-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.12.005.
10
Barrett's oesophagus: epidemiology, diagnosis and clinical management.巴雷特食管:流行病学、诊断和临床管理。
Med J Aust. 2016 Oct 3;205(7):317-24. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00796.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factor analysis and predictive model construction for postoperative bleeding in early esophageal cancer.早期食管癌术后出血的危险因素分析及预测模型构建
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):5487-5496. doi: 10.62347/KSVJ3486. eCollection 2024.
2
Improving the communication of multifactorial cancer risk assessment results for different audiences: a co-design process.改善针对不同受众的多因素癌症风险评估结果的沟通:一个协同设计过程。
J Community Genet. 2024 Oct;15(5):499-515. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00729-4. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
AI and professional liability assessment in healthcare. A revolution in legal medicine?人工智能与医疗保健中的职业责任评估。法医学的一场革命?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 8;10:1337335. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1337335. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a novel risk prediction algorithm to estimate 10-year risk of oesophageal cancer in primary care: prospective cohort study and evaluation of performance against two other risk prediction models.一种用于估计初级保健中食管癌10年风险的新型风险预测算法的开发与验证:前瞻性队列研究及与其他两种风险预测模型的性能评估
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 14;32:100700. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100700. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Ethical and legal considerations influencing human involvement in the implementation of artificial intelligence in a clinical pathway: A multi-stakeholder perspective.影响人类参与临床路径中人工智能实施的伦理和法律考量:多利益相关方视角
Front Digit Health. 2023 Mar 13;5:1139210. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1139210. eCollection 2023.
3
Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review and recommendations to support implementation.基于人群的癌症筛查中风险分层的可接受性:从医疗保健专业人员的角度出发的混合方法系统评价及实施建议。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0279201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279201. eCollection 2023.
4
Association Between Purchase of Over-the-Counter Medications and Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis in the Cancer Loyalty Card Study (CLOCS): Observational Case-Control Study.《癌症忠诚卡研究(CLOCS)中:观察性病例对照研究》购买非处方药物与卵巢癌诊断之间的关联。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 26;9:e41762. doi: 10.2196/41762.
5
Integrating genome-wide polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk to predict colorectal cancer diagnosis using UK Biobank data: population based cohort study.利用英国生物库数据整合全基因组多基因风险评分和非遗传风险来预测结直肠癌诊断:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Nov 9;379:e071707. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071707.
6
Machine Learning for Risk Prediction of Oesophago-Gastric Cancer in Primary Care: Comparison with Existing Risk-Assessment Tools.基层医疗中用于食管癌和胃癌风险预测的机器学习:与现有风险评估工具的比较
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 14;14(20):5023. doi: 10.3390/cancers14205023.
7
AI-assisted discovery of an ethnicity-influenced driver of cell transformation in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.人工智能辅助发现食管和胃食管交界处腺癌中受种族影响的细胞转化驱动因素。
JCI Insight. 2022 Sep 22;7(18):e161334. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.161334.
8
Developing a National Newborn Genomes Program: An Approach Driven by Ethics, Engagement and Co-design.制定国家新生儿基因组计划:一种由伦理、参与和共同设计驱动的方法。
Front Genet. 2022 May 30;13:866168. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866168. eCollection 2022.
9
Using cancer risk algorithms to improve risk estimates and referral decisions.使用癌症风险算法来改善风险评估和转诊决策。
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Jan 10;2:2. doi: 10.1038/s43856-021-00069-1. eCollection 2022.
10
Use of a Cytosponge biomarker panel to prioritise endoscopic Barrett's oesophagus surveillance: a cross-sectional study followed by a real-world prospective pilot.使用 Cytosponge 生物标志物面板对内镜 Barrett 食管监测进行优先级排序:一项横断面研究及后续真实世界前瞻性试点研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Feb;23(2):270-278. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00667-7. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

实施风险算法进行食管癌早期检测和筛查的伦理和法律影响,现在和未来。

Ethical and legal implications of implementing risk algorithms for early detection and screening for oesophageal cancer, now and in the future.

机构信息

PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 30;18(10):e0293576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293576. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0293576
PMID:37903120
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10615292/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer has significant morbidity and mortality but late diagnosis is common since early signs of disease are frequently misinterpreted. Project DELTA aims to enable earlier detection and treatment through targeted screening using a novel risk prediction algorithm for oesophageal cancer (incorporating risk factors of Barrett's oesophagus including prescriptions for acid-reducing medications (CanPredict)), together with a non-invasive, low-cost sampling device (CytospongeTM). However, there are many barriers to implementation, and this paper identifies key ethical and legal challenges to implementing these personalised prevention strategies for Barrett's oesophagus/oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

To identify ethical and legal issues relevant to the deployment of a risk prediction tool for oesophageal cancer into primary care, we adopted an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating targeted informal literature reviews, interviews with expert collaborators, a multidisciplinary workshop and ethical and legal analysis.

RESULTS

Successful implementation raises many issues including ensuring transparency and effective risk communication; addressing bias and inequity; managing resources appropriately and avoiding exceptionalism. Clinicians will need support and training to use cancer risk prediction algorithms, ensuring that they understand how risk algorithms supplement rather than replace medical decision-making. Workshop participants had concerns about liability for harms arising from risk algorithms, including from potential bias and inequitable implementation. Determining strategies for risk communication enabling transparency but avoiding exceptionalist approaches are a significant challenge. Future challenges include using artificial intelligence to bolster risk assessment, incorporating genomics into risk tools, and deployment by non-health professional users. However, these strategies could improve detection and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel pathways incorporating risk prediction algorithms hold considerable promise, especially when combined with low-cost sampling. However immediate priorities should be to develop risk communication strategies that take account of using validated risk algorithms, and to ensure equitable implementation. Resolving questions about liability for harms arising should be a longer-term objective.

摘要

背景

食管癌具有较高的发病率和死亡率,但由于疾病早期症状常被误诊,因此诊断往往较晚。DELTA 项目旨在通过使用一种新的食管癌风险预测算法(纳入 Barrett 食管的风险因素,包括开具抑酸药物的处方(CanPredict))进行有针对性的筛查,以及使用一种非侵入性、低成本的采样设备(CytospongeTM),实现早期发现和治疗。然而,在实施过程中存在许多障碍,本文确定了实施 Barrett 食管/食管癌个性化预防策略的关键伦理和法律挑战。

方法

为了确定与将食管癌风险预测工具部署到初级保健相关的伦理和法律问题,我们采用了跨学科方法,包括有针对性的非正式文献综述、与专家合作者的访谈、多学科研讨会以及伦理和法律分析。

结果

成功实施会引发诸多问题,包括确保透明度和有效的风险沟通;解决偏见和不平等问题;合理管理资源,避免特殊主义。临床医生将需要支持和培训才能使用癌症风险预测算法,确保他们了解风险算法如何补充而不是替代医学决策。研讨会参与者对风险算法引起的伤害的责任表示担忧,包括潜在的偏见和不平等实施。确定风险沟通策略以实现透明度但避免特殊主义方法是一个重大挑战。未来的挑战包括使用人工智能来增强风险评估、将基因组学纳入风险工具,以及由非医疗专业人员用户进行部署。然而,这些策略可以改善检测和结果。

结论

新型风险预测算法途径具有很大的潜力,尤其是与低成本采样相结合时。然而,当前的优先事项应该是制定风险沟通策略,考虑使用经过验证的风险算法,并确保公平实施。解决因风险算法引起的伤害责任问题应该是一个长期目标。