• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于估计初级保健中食管癌10年风险的新型风险预测算法的开发与验证:前瞻性队列研究及与其他两种风险预测模型的性能评估

Development and validation of a novel risk prediction algorithm to estimate 10-year risk of oesophageal cancer in primary care: prospective cohort study and evaluation of performance against two other risk prediction models.

作者信息

Hippisley-Cox Julia, Mei Winnie, Fitzgerald Rebecca, Coupland Carol

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, England.

Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 14;32:100700. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100700. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100700
PMID:37635924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10450987/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methods to identify patients at increased risk of oesophageal cancer are needed to better identify those for targeted screening. We aimed to derive and validate novel risk prediction algorithms (CanPredict) to estimate the 10-year risk of oesophageal cancer and evaluate performance against two other risk prediction models.

METHODS

Prospective open cohort study using routinely collected data from 1804 QResearch® general practices. We used 1354 practices (12.9 M patients) to develop the algorithm. We validated the algorithm in 450 separate practices from QResearch (4.12 M patients) and 355 Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) practices (2.53 M patients). The primary outcome was an incident diagnosis of oesophageal cancer found in GP, mortality, hospital, or cancer registry data. Patients were aged 25-84 years and free of oesophageal cancer at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were used with prediction selection to derive risk equations. Risk factors included age, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation score, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol, family history, relevant co-morbidities and medications. Measures of calibration, discrimination, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated in the validation cohorts.

FINDING

There were 16,384 incident cases of oesophageal cancer in the derivation cohort (0.13% of 12.9 M). The predictors in the final algorithms were: age, BMI, Townsend deprivation score, smoking, alcohol, ethnicity, Barrett's oesophagus, hiatus hernia, infection, use of proton pump inhibitors, anaemia, lung and blood cancer (with breast cancer in women). In the QResearch validation cohort in women the explained variation (R) was 57.1%; Royston's D statistic 2.36 (95% CI 2.26-2.46); C statistic 0.859 (95% CI 0.849-0.868) and calibration was good. Results were similar in men. For the 20% at highest predicted risk, the sensitivity was 76%, specificity was 80.1% and the observed risk at 10 years was 0.76%. The results from the CPRD validation were similar.

INTERPRETATION

We have developed and validated a novel prediction algorithm to quantify the absolute risk of oesophageal cancer. The CanPredict algorithms could be used to identify high risk patients for targeted screening.

FUNDING

Innovate UK and CRUK (grant 105857).

摘要

背景

需要有方法来识别食管癌风险增加的患者,以便更好地确定那些适合进行靶向筛查的人群。我们旨在推导并验证新的风险预测算法(CanPredict),以估计食管癌的10年风险,并与其他两种风险预测模型比较性能。

方法

采用前瞻性开放队列研究,使用从1804个QResearch®全科医疗诊所常规收集的数据。我们用1354个诊所(1290万患者)来开发该算法。我们在来自QResearch的450个独立诊所(412万患者)和355个临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)诊所(253万患者)中验证该算法。主要结局是在全科医生、死亡率、医院或癌症登记数据中发现的食管癌确诊病例。患者年龄在25 - 84岁之间,基线时无食管癌。使用Cox比例风险模型和预测选择来推导风险方程。风险因素包括年龄、种族、汤森德剥夺评分、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟、饮酒、家族史、相关合并症和药物。在验证队列中计算校准、区分度、敏感性和特异性的指标。

结果

在推导队列中有16384例食管癌确诊病例(占1290万的0.13%)。最终算法中的预测因素为:年龄、BMI、汤森德剥夺评分、吸烟、饮酒、种族、巴雷特食管、食管裂孔疝、感染、质子泵抑制剂的使用、贫血、肺癌和血癌(女性为乳腺癌)。在QResearch验证队列中,女性的解释变异(R)为57.1%;罗伊斯顿D统计量为2.36(95%置信区间2.26 - 2.46);C统计量为0.859(95%置信区间0.849 - 0.868),校准良好。男性的结果相似。对于预测风险最高的20%人群,敏感性为76%,特异性为80.1%,10年观察到的风险为0.76%。CPRD验证的结果相似。

解读

我们已经开发并验证了一种新的预测算法,以量化食管癌的绝对风险。CanPredict算法可用于识别适合靶向筛查的高危患者。

资助

英国创新署和英国癌症研究中心(资助编号105857)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/4d94015ff535/figs17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/a183ebb8a74f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/3e1302ced312/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/ecff19373b43/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/d89e8622f4db/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/8e4a1b19852d/figs2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/ace12816aeb5/figs3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/5373f45b72c2/figs4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/a07f09639c6c/figs5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/16a9d0e6179a/figs6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/7051792e45e1/figs7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/7f404f1e3c8e/figs8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/8526df3e1c33/figs9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/d8acbc321247/figs10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/90a626827a14/figs11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/137e8e402272/figs12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/94186a8495bc/figs13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/995e671791b7/figs14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/10159e708dd8/figs15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/3c8533ee67a3/figs16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/4d94015ff535/figs17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/a183ebb8a74f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/3e1302ced312/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/ecff19373b43/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/d89e8622f4db/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/8e4a1b19852d/figs2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/ace12816aeb5/figs3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/5373f45b72c2/figs4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/a07f09639c6c/figs5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/16a9d0e6179a/figs6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/7051792e45e1/figs7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/7f404f1e3c8e/figs8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/8526df3e1c33/figs9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/d8acbc321247/figs10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/90a626827a14/figs11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/137e8e402272/figs12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/94186a8495bc/figs13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/995e671791b7/figs14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/10159e708dd8/figs15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/3c8533ee67a3/figs16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a8/10450987/4d94015ff535/figs17.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a novel risk prediction algorithm to estimate 10-year risk of oesophageal cancer in primary care: prospective cohort study and evaluation of performance against two other risk prediction models.一种用于估计初级保健中食管癌10年风险的新型风险预测算法的开发与验证:前瞻性队列研究及与其他两种风险预测模型的性能评估
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 14;32:100700. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100700. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.预测肺癌未来风险:CanPredict(肺部)模型在 1967 万人中的开发、内部和外部验证以及该模型与其他七个风险预测模型的性能评估。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Aug;11(8):685-697. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00050-4. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Development and validation of risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of common cancers in men and women: prospective cohort study.男性和女性常见癌症未来风险预测算法的开发与验证:前瞻性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 17;5(3):e007825. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007825.
4
Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of heart failure in patients with diabetes: a prospective cohort study.用于估计糖尿病患者未来心力衰竭风险的风险预测方程的开发与验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 9;5(9):e008503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008503.
5
Development and validation of QDiabetes-2018 risk prediction algorithm to estimate future risk of type 2 diabetes: cohort study.用于估计2型糖尿病未来风险的QDiabetes-2018风险预测算法的开发与验证:队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Nov 20;359:j5019. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5019.
6
Predicting risk of emergency admission to hospital using primary care data: derivation and validation of QAdmissions score.利用初级保健数据预测急诊住院风险:QAdmissions 评分的推导和验证。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 19;3(8):e003482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003482.
7
Development and validation of QMortality risk prediction algorithm to estimate short term risk of death and assess frailty: cohort study.用于估计短期死亡风险和评估虚弱程度的 Q 死亡率风险预测算法的开发与验证:队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Sep 20;358:j4208. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4208.
8
Identifying patients with suspected gastro-oesophageal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm.在初级保健中识别疑似胃食管癌症患者:算法的推导和验证。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Nov;61(592):e707-14. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X606609.
9
Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study.用于估计心血管疾病未来风险的QRISK3风险预测算法的开发与验证:前瞻性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 May 23;357:j2099. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2099.
10
Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study.糖尿病患者失明和下肢截肢未来风险预测方程的开发与验证:队列研究
BMJ. 2015 Nov 11;351:h5441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5441.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of nomograms including individual- and area-level variables to predict risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular diseases among Russian population.包含个体和地区层面变量的列线图的开发与验证,用于预测俄罗斯人群中致命和非致命心血管疾病的风险。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(5):e0324736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324736. eCollection 2025.
2
An anoikis-related lncRNA signature may predict the prognosis, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity in esophageal cancer.一种与失巢凋亡相关的长链非编码RNA特征可能预测食管癌的预后、免疫浸润和药物敏感性。
Heliyon. 2024 May 14;10(10):e31202. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31202. eCollection 2024 May 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
AI-assisted discovery of an ethnicity-influenced driver of cell transformation in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.人工智能辅助发现食管和胃食管交界处腺癌中受种族影响的细胞转化驱动因素。
JCI Insight. 2022 Sep 22;7(18):e161334. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.161334.
2
Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods.存在竞争风险时预测模型的验证:现代方法指南
BMJ. 2022 May 24;377:e069249. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069249.
3
Guideline to Practice: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline.
Ethical and legal implications of implementing risk algorithms for early detection and screening for oesophageal cancer, now and in the future.
实施风险算法进行食管癌早期检测和筛查的伦理和法律影响,现在和未来。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 30;18(10):e0293576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293576. eCollection 2023.
4
Targeting diagnostic interventions for oesophageal cancer.食管癌的靶向诊断干预措施
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 16;32:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100716. eCollection 2023 Sep.
实践指南:巴雷特食管的诊断与管理:美国胃肠病学会更新指南
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 1;117(8):1177-1180. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001788. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
4
Risk Prediction Model for Esophageal Cancer Among General Population: A Systematic Review.一般人群食管癌风险预测模型:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;9:680967. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.680967. eCollection 2021.
5
An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: a national validation cohort study in England.QCovid 风险预测算法对成年人 COVID-19 死亡率风险的外部验证:英格兰全国验证队列研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jul;3(7):e425-e433. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00080-7. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Cohort Studies.基于队列研究的食管鳞状细胞癌风险预测模型的开发与验证
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr;116(4):683-691. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001094.
7
Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3 versus usual care to identify Barrett's oesophagus in a primary care setting: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.Cytosponge-三叶因子 3 与常规护理在初级保健环境中识别 Barrett 食管:一项多中心、实用、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):333-344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31099-0.
8
International trends in oesophageal cancer survival by histological subtype between 1995 and 2014.1995 年至 2014 年间,按组织学亚型划分的食管癌生存的国际趋势。
Gut. 2021 Feb;70(2):234-242. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321089. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Systematic Review with Meta-analysis: Association of Helicobacter pylori Infection with Esophageal Cancer.系统评价与Meta分析:幽门螺杆菌感染与食管癌的关联
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Dec 1;2019:1953497. doi: 10.1155/2019/1953497. eCollection 2019.
10
Constitutively Higher Level of GSTT2 in Esophageal Tissues From African Americans Protects Cells Against DNA Damage.非裔美国人食管组织中 GSTT2 的持续高水平可保护细胞免受 DNA 损伤。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Apr;156(5):1404-1415. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 19.