Suppr超能文献

《2023年哮喘诊治的逐步方法再探讨:土耳其哮喘诊断与管理指南专家组意见》

Stepwise Approach in Asthma Revisited 2023: Expert Panel Opinion of Turkish Guideline of Asthma Diagnosis and Management Group.

作者信息

Çelik Gülfem Elif, Aydın Ömür, Damadoğlu Ebru, Baççıoğlu Ayşe, Kepil Özdemir Seçil, Bavbek Sevim, Ediger Dane, Öner Erkekol Ferda, Gemicioğlu Bilun, Işık Sacide Rana, Kalpaklıoğlu Ayşe Füsun, Kalyoncu Ali Fuat, Karakaya Gül, Keren Metin, Mungan Dilşad, Oğuzülgen İpek Kıvılcım, Yıldız Füsun, Yılmaz İnsu, Yorgancıoğlu Arzu

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Chest Diseases, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Thorac Res Pract. 2023 Nov;24(6):309-324. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.23035.

Abstract

Introduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been the cornerstone of the long-term management of asthma. ICSs either alone or in combination with long-acting beta-2 agonists have been shown to be associated with favorable asthma outcomes. However, asthma control is still reported to be below expectations all around the world. Research in the last decades focusing on the use of ICS/formoterol both as maintenance and as needed (maintenance and reliever therapy approach) showed improved asthma outcomes. As a result of recent developments, Turkish Asthma Guidelines group aimed to revise asthma treatment recommendations. In general, we recommend physicians to consider the risk factors for poor asthma outcomes, patients' compliance and expectations and then to determine "a personalized treatment plan." Importantly, the use of short-acting beta-2 agonists alone as a symptom reliever in asthma patients not using regular ICS is no longer recommended. In stepwise treatment approach, we primarily recommend to use ICS-based controllers and initiate ICS as soon as possible. We define 2 different treatment tracks in stepwise approaches as maintenance and reliever therapy or fixed-dose therapy and equally recommend each track depending on the patient's risks as well as decision of physicians in a personalized manner. For both tracks, a strong recommendation was made in favor of using add-on treatments before initiating phenotype-specific treatment in step 5. A strong recommendation was also made in favor of using biologic agents and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization in severe asthma when indicated.

摘要

吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)的引入一直是哮喘长期管理的基石。已证明ICS单独使用或与长效β2激动剂联合使用均与良好的哮喘治疗效果相关。然而,据报道全球哮喘控制水平仍低于预期。过去几十年针对ICS/福莫特罗作为维持治疗和按需治疗(维持和缓解治疗方法)的研究显示哮喘治疗效果有所改善。由于近期的进展,土耳其哮喘指南小组旨在修订哮喘治疗建议。总体而言,我们建议医生考虑哮喘治疗效果不佳的风险因素、患者的依从性和期望,然后确定“个性化治疗方案”。重要的是,不再推荐未规律使用ICS的哮喘患者单独使用短效β2激动剂作为症状缓解药物。在逐步治疗方法中,我们主要建议使用基于ICS的控制药物并尽快启动ICS治疗。我们在逐步治疗方法中定义了2种不同的治疗路径,即维持和缓解治疗或固定剂量治疗,并根据患者风险以及医生的个性化决策同等推荐每种路径。对于这两种路径,均强烈建议在第5步启动针对特定表型的治疗之前先使用附加治疗。对于重度哮喘,在有指征时,也强烈建议在脱敏后使用生物制剂和/或阿司匹林治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb5/10724792/cd9a3db8b485/trp-24-6-309_f001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验