• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳牙冠失败的原因:系统评价与Meta分析方案

Reasons for Crown Failures in Primary Teeth: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Lampl Stephan, Gurunathan Deepa, Krithikadatta Jogikalmat, Mehta Deepak, Moodley Desigar

机构信息

Department of Cariology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 1;12:e51505. doi: 10.2196/51505.

DOI:10.2196/51505
PMID:37910174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10652188/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a tendency nowadays to restore large defects in primary dentition with pediatric crowns instead of conventional restorations. Thus, understanding the factors contributing to the survival or failure of dental crowns in pediatric dentistry is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this protocol is to outline the methodological approach for analyzing data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials to investigate reasons for the failure of dental crowns in primary teeth and to compute their survival and failure rates.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review will be performed in electronic databases, including PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science. As per predefined inclusion criteria, we will include observational studies (prospective clinical studies) and randomized clinical trials that have an English abstract and involve children aged 1-10 years undergoing crown restorations. Two independent reviewers will independently screen all retrieved records and full-text articles and extract data. The study's methodological quality will be appraised using suitable tools. Assessments of publication bias will be performed using funnel plots. The findings will be described qualitatively for the systematic review. If possible, a meta-analysis will be performed to estimate failure rates by dividing the number of failures by the total exposure time. A Poisson regression model, assuming constant event rates, will be used to compute 3-year and 5-year survival proportions. The Pearson goodness-of-fit statistics will be used to assess the heterogeneity of the model. A P value <.05 will be considered significant. All analyses will be performed using R Statistical software (version 4.1.2; R Core Team).

RESULTS

This systematic review and synthesis aim to assess the survival and failure rates of dental crowns in pediatric dentistry. By following this rigorous methodology, we seek to provide valuable insights into the factors contributing to the success or failure of these restorations. The results of our full review will have implications for pediatric dentists, researchers, and policy makers, helping to improve dental care for children.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review protocol helps in establishing a thorough approach for reviewing failures in pediatric crowns. By following this methodology, standardization and transparency of the process as well as accountability for the stated methods and outcomes will be ensured. The findings of this review and analysis will provide useful data on the survival of crowns to pediatric dentists and researchers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023442266; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=442266.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/51505.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8566/10652188/f33aa80c9eee/resprot_v12i1e51505_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8566/10652188/f33aa80c9eee/resprot_v12i1e51505_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8566/10652188/f33aa80c9eee/resprot_v12i1e51505_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

如今,用儿童牙冠修复乳牙的大缺损而非传统修复方法已成为一种趋势。因此,了解影响儿童牙科中牙冠存活或失败的因素对于优化治疗效果至关重要。

目的

本方案的主要目的是概述分析观察性研究和随机对照试验数据的方法,以调查乳牙牙冠失败的原因并计算其存活率和失败率。

方法

将在电子数据库中进行全面的文献综述,包括PubMed(MEDLINE)、Cochrane、Embase和Web of Science。根据预先定义的纳入标准,我们将纳入有英文摘要且涉及1至10岁接受牙冠修复儿童的观察性研究(前瞻性临床研究)和随机临床试验。两名独立的评审员将独立筛选所有检索到的记录和全文文章并提取数据。将使用合适的工具评估研究的方法学质量。将使用漏斗图进行发表偏倚评估。将对系统评价的结果进行定性描述。如果可能,将进行荟萃分析,通过将失败数除以总暴露时间来估计失败率。将使用假设事件率恒定的泊松回归模型计算3年和5年生存率。将使用Pearson拟合优度统计量评估模型的异质性。P值<.05将被视为具有统计学意义。所有分析将使用R统计软件(版本4.1.2;R核心团队)进行。

结果

本系统评价和综合分析旨在评估儿童牙科中牙冠的存活率和失败率。通过遵循这种严谨的方法,我们旨在为这些修复体成功或失败的影响因素提供有价值的见解。我们全面审查的结果将对儿童牙医、研究人员和政策制定者产生影响,有助于改善儿童的牙科护理。

结论

本系统评价方案有助于建立一种全面的方法来审查儿童牙冠的失败情况。通过遵循这种方法,将确保过程的标准化和透明度以及对所述方法和结果的问责制。本综述和分析的结果将为儿童牙医和研究人员提供有关牙冠存活的有用数据。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42023442266;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=442266。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/51505。

相似文献

1
Reasons for Crown Failures in Primary Teeth: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳牙冠失败的原因:系统评价与Meta分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 1;12:e51505. doi: 10.2196/51505.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Sociotechnical Work Systems-Effects of Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Medical Imaging on Clinical Efficiency: Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review.将人工智能整合到社会技术工作系统中——医学成像中人工智能解决方案对临床效率的影响:一项系统文献综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Dec 1;11(12):e40485. doi: 10.2196/40485.
4
Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Teledentistry From the Perspective of Dental Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Review.从牙科保健专业人员角度看实施远程牙科的障碍与推动因素:一项系统的定量、定性和混合研究综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 26;12:e44218. doi: 10.2196/44218.
5
University Food Environment Assessment Methods and Their Implications: Protocol for a Systematic Review.大学食品环境评估方法及其影响:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 23;13:e54955. doi: 10.2196/54955.
6
Tui Na for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.推拿治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛:系统评价与Meta分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 27;10(1):e20615. doi: 10.2196/20615.
7
Outcomes After Receipt of Neuraxial or Regional Anesthesia Instead of General Anesthesia for Lower Limb Revascularization Surgery: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.下肢血管重建手术采用神经轴索或区域麻醉而非全身麻醉后的结局:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 26;10(11):e32170. doi: 10.2196/32170.
8
Pediatric Tui Na for Feeding Intolerance in Premature Infants: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小儿推拿治疗早产儿喂养不耐受:系统评价与Meta分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 16;12:e46375. doi: 10.2196/46375.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Reasons for Failure of CAD/CAM Restorations in Clinical Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.CAD/CAM 修复体临床研究失败的原因:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):129-136. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3472.

引用本文的文献

1
Reasons for Crown Failures in Primary Teeth: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳牙冠失败的原因:系统评价与荟萃分析
Interact J Med Res. 2025 May 1;14:e57958. doi: 10.2196/57958.
2
Evaluating the Success of Preformed Resin Bonded Composite Strip Crowns for the Primary Central Incisor in Restoring Carious Primary Canine Teeth: A Retrospective Analysis.评估预成树脂粘结复合带环冠修复乳切牙龋损乳尖牙的成功率:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2024 Aug 16;16(8):e67012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67012. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Evaluation of Microleakage Using Different Luting Cements in Kedo Zirconia Crowns: An In Vitro Assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.CAD/CAM全瓷牙支持的固定义齿的临床性能:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 20;14(10):2672. doi: 10.3390/ma14102672.
2
The prevalence of awake bruxism and sleep bruxism in the Dutch adolescent population.荷兰青少年人群中清醒磨牙症和睡眠磨牙症的患病率。
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 Feb;48(2):143-149. doi: 10.1111/joor.13117. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
3
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
使用不同粘结水门汀对Kedo氧化锆全冠微渗漏的评估:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66237. eCollection 2024 Aug.
《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
4
Speech evaluation in children with missing anterior teeth and after prosthetic rehabilitation with fixed functional space maintainer.前牙缺失儿童及使用固定功能性间隙保持器进行修复后的语音评估。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;36(4):391-395. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_221_18.
5
Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures.乳牙修复:一项关于存活率和失败原因的系统评价。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):123-139. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12346. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.量化荟萃分析中的发表偏倚。
Biometrics. 2018 Sep;74(3):785-794. doi: 10.1111/biom.12817. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
Evidence-based Update of Pediatric Dental Restorative Procedures: Dental Materials.儿童牙科修复程序的循证更新:牙科材料
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Summer;39(4):303-10. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.4.303.
8
Apps seeking theories: results of a study on the use of health behavior change theories in cancer survivorship mobile apps.应用程序寻求理论:一项关于癌症生存者移动应用程序中使用健康行为改变理论的研究结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 27;3(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3861.
9
Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression.全球未经治疗龋齿的负担:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Dent Res. 2015 May;94(5):650-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034515573272. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
10
Space maintainers in dentistry: past to present.牙科中的间隙保持器:从过去到现在。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2402-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6604.3539. Epub 2013 Oct 5.