Neurological Pupillary Index (NPi) Measurement Using Pupillometry and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children.

Aim/objective Neurological Pupil Index (NPi), measured by automated pupillometry (AP), allows the objective assessment of pupillary light reflex (PLR). NPi ranges from 0 (non-reactive) to 5 (normal). In this study, we aimed to compare neurologic and functional outcomes in children admitted for neurologic injury with normal (≥3) versus abnormal (<3) NPi measured during their pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of children between one month and 18 years admitted to our PICU with a diagnosis of neurologic injury between January 2019 and June 2022. We collected demographic, clinical, pupillometer, and outcome data, including mortality, Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC), Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC), and Functional Status Score (FSS) at admission, at discharge, and at the three to six-month follow-up. We defined abnormal pupil response as any NPi <3 at any point during the PICU stay. Using the student's t-test and chi-square test, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of children with abnormal NPi (<3) versus those with normal NPi (≥3). Results There were 49 children who met the inclusion criteria and who had pupillometry data available for analysis. The mean (SD) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in the study cohort was 5.6 (4.3), and 61% had low (<3) NPi during ICU stay. Mortality was significantly higher among patients with an abnormal NPi as compared to those with normal NPi. Children with abnormal NPi exhibited significant worsening of neurologic and functional status (ΔPCPC, ΔPOPC, and ΔFSS) from admission to discharge (mean (SD): 3.55(1.5), 3.45(1.43), 16.75(7.85), p<0.001) as compared to those with normal NPi (mean (SD): 1.45(0.93), 1.73(0.90), 3.55(2.07), p>0.05). The significant difference in neurologic and functional status persisted at the three to six-month follow-up between the two groups - children with abnormal NPi (mean (SD): 2.0(1.41), 2.08(1.38), 6.92(6.83), p<0.01) and children with normal NPi (mean (SD): 0.82(1.01), 0.94(1.03), 1.53(1.70), p>0.05). Conclusion In our retrospective cohort study, children admitted to the PICU for a neuro injury and with abnormal NPi (< 3) have higher mortality, and worse short-term and long-term neurologic and functional outcomes as compared to those with normal NPi (≥ 3) measured during the PICU course. AP provides an objective assessment of PLR and has potential applications for neuro-prognostication. More research needs to be done to elucidate the prognostic value of NPi in pediatrics.