Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2023;2023. doi: 10.1155/2023/2162900. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
The Diabetes Device Confidence Scale (DDCS) is a new scale designed to evaluate school nurse confidence with diabetes devices. We hypothesized that DDCS score would be associated with related constructs of school nurse diabetes knowledge, experience, and training.
In a cross-sectional study, we co-administered the DDCS and Diabetes Knowledge Test 2 (DKT2) questionnaires to school nurses in Pennsylvania. We summarized DDCS scores (range 1-5) descriptively. We evaluated the relationship between DKT2 percent score and DDCS mean score with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Simple linear regression examined school nurse characteristics as predictors of DDCS score.
A total of 271 completed surveys were received. Mean DDCS score was 3.16±0.94, indicating moderate confidence with devices overall. School nurses frequently reported low confidence in items representing specific skills, including suspending insulin delivery (40%), giving a manual bolus (42%), knowing when to calibrate a continuous glucose monitor (48%), changing an insulin pump site (54%), and setting a temporary basal rate (58%). Mean DKT2 score was 89.5±0.1%, which was weakly but not significantly correlated with DDCS score (r=0.12, p=0.06). Formal device training (p<0.001), assisting ≥5 students with diabetes devices in the past 5 years (p<0.01), and a student caseload between 1000-1500 students (p<0.001) were associated with higher mean DDCS score.
DDCS score is related to prior training and experience, providing evidence for the scale's convergent validity. The DDCS may be a useful tool for assessing school nurse readiness to use devices and identify areas to enhance knowledge and practical skills.
糖尿病设备信心量表(DDCS)是一种新的量表,旨在评估学校护士对糖尿病设备的信心。我们假设 DDCS 评分与学校护士糖尿病知识、经验和培训的相关结构有关。
在一项横断面研究中,我们向宾夕法尼亚州的学校护士共同管理 DDCS 和糖尿病知识测试 2(DKT2)问卷。我们对 DDCS 评分(范围 1-5)进行描述性总结。我们用 Spearman 相关系数评估 DKT2 百分制分数与 DDCS 平均分数之间的关系。简单线性回归检验了学校护士特征作为 DDCS 评分的预测因子。
共收到 271 份完整的调查。平均 DDCS 得分为 3.16±0.94,表明对设备的总体信心适中。学校护士经常报告对代表特定技能的项目缺乏信心,包括暂停胰岛素输送(40%)、给予手动推注(42%)、知道何时校准连续血糖监测仪(48%)、更换胰岛素泵部位(54%)和设置临时基础率(58%)。平均 DKT2 得分为 89.5±0.1%,与 DDCS 得分呈弱相关,但无统计学意义(r=0.12,p=0.06)。正式的设备培训(p<0.001)、过去 5 年中协助≥5 名糖尿病设备学生(p<0.01)和学生人数在 1000-1500 名之间(p<0.001)与较高的平均 DDCS 得分相关。
DDCS 评分与先前的培训和经验有关,为量表的收敛效度提供了证据。DDCS 可能是评估学校护士使用设备准备情况并确定需要提高知识和实践技能的有用工具。