Vogel P
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1986 Oct;54(10):305-17. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001936.
In 172 patients suffering from neuropathies of different aetiologies (diabetic, uraemic, inflammatory, hereditary, alcoholic, cryptogenic) the SEP findings (cortical median and sural nerve SEP, cervical median nerve SEP, Erb's point potential) were compared with the results of conventional sensory and motor electroneurography (ENG) and with clinical signs. SEP's yielded a high percentage of abnormalities. Thus in 5 of the 6 groups the sural nerve SEP presented an unequivocal latency prolongation in 55 to 75% of the patients, in HMSN-I-patients even in 100%. Also well over 50% of the median nerve evoked potentials were outside the normal range. In many cases the delay of the SEP's simply reflected the impairment of conduction within the peripheral nerve fibres as documented by ENG; here the ENG was naturally even more sensitive in detecting slight distal conduction disturbance, which did not shift the SEP latency outside the normal range. However, in a certain percentage that varied in the different aetiological groups, the SEP's demonstrated an impairment of conduction within the proximal segments of the sensory system not accessible to conventional ENG technique. Thus, in 15 to 25% of the patients with diabetic, uraemic, inflammatory and cryptogenic neuropathies, pathological SEP findings were combined with normal results of the ENG examination. In no case this "proximal" conduction disturbance affected the "central conduction" between the cervical spinal cord and the cortex. A more detailed differentiation was often impossible: A prolonged conduction time between brachial plexus and cervical cord could not be subdivided further due to the lack of the SEP component representing the "spinal entry of the afferent volley". SEP's--especially the cortical SEP's--can be reliably recorded even if a peripheral sensory nerve action potential is lacking; in these cases the extent of the conduction disturbance is documented only by the--practically always demonstrable--delay of the SEP. Nearly without exception, pronounced latency prolongations were seen only in cortical SEP's because in these cases the subcortical components could no longer be identified. Two types of considerably delayed cortical SEP's could be distinguished: Potentials of abnormal shape, where the complete extinction of the initial complex had to be assumed: the latency prolongation cannot be equated with the actual conduction delay. Completely normal-shaped potentials whose latency times evidently reflected the real delay.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在172例患有不同病因(糖尿病性、尿毒症性、炎性、遗传性、酒精性、隐源性)神经病变的患者中,将体感诱发电位(SEP)结果(皮质正中神经和腓肠神经SEP、颈段正中神经SEP、Erb点电位)与传统感觉和运动神经电图(ENG)结果及临床体征进行了比较。SEP显示出高比例的异常。因此,在6组中的5组中,55%至75%的患者腓肠神经SEP出现明确的潜伏期延长,在遗传性运动感觉神经病I型(HMSN-I)患者中甚至100%出现。正中神经诱发电位也有超过50%超出正常范围。在许多情况下,SEP的延迟仅仅反映了ENG所记录的周围神经纤维内传导的损害;在此,ENG在检测轻微的远端传导障碍方面自然更为敏感,这种障碍并未使SEP潜伏期超出正常范围。然而,在不同病因组中比例各异的一定百分比患者中,SEP显示出传统ENG技术无法检测到的感觉系统近端节段内的传导损害。因此,在15%至25%的糖尿病性、尿毒症性、炎性和隐源性神经病变患者中,SEP的病理结果与ENG检查的正常结果并存。在任何情况下,这种“近端”传导障碍均未影响颈脊髓与皮质之间的“中枢传导”。通常无法进行更详细的区分:由于缺乏代表“传入冲动的脊髓传入”的SEP成分,臂丛神经与颈脊髓之间延长的传导时间无法进一步细分。即使缺乏周围感觉神经动作电位,也能可靠地记录SEP——尤其是皮质SEP;在这些情况下,传导障碍的程度仅通过SEP——几乎总是可证实的——延迟来记录。几乎无一例外,明显的潜伏期延长仅见于皮质SEP,因为在这些情况下,皮质下成分已无法识别。可区分出两种明显延迟的皮质SEP:形状异常的电位,必须假定其初始复合波完全消失:潜伏期延长不能等同于实际的传导延迟。形状完全正常的电位,其潜伏期明显反映了实际延迟。(摘要截取自400字)