• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的危险因素分析及预测模型构建

Analysis of risk factors and construction of predictive model for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

作者信息

Zhu Ping

机构信息

Ping Zhu Department of Gastroenterology, The first people's Hospital of Linping District, Hangzhou 311100, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Nov-Dec;39(6):1642-1646. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.7972.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.39.6.7972
PMID:37936748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10626097/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the risk factors of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) and to establish a predictive model.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study. Patients diagnosed with calculous cholangitis and treated with ERCP (n=998) in The First People's Hospital of Linping District from January 2014 to September 2022 were included. Risk factors of PEP were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and a nomograph prediction model was established based on the identified independent risk factors.

RESULTS

PEP occurred in 52 patients (5.2%). Logistic regression analysis showed that common bile duct diameter, history of PEP, operation time, intubation frequency, pancreatic ducts visualization, and Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) were independent risk factors for inducing PEP (P<0.05). The calibration curve showed that the predicted probability of occurrence of the nomograph model was consistent with the actual probability of occurrence. The C-index value calculated by the Bootstrap method was 0.966, suggesting the nomograph prediction model has a good discrimination ability. The AUC of the nomograph prediction model ROC curve was 0.966 (95% CI: 0.857-0.941), suggesting good prediction efficiency, and the decision analysis curve shows a high value.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent risk factors for PEP are large diameter of common bile duct, history of pancreatitis, long operation time, high intubation frequency, pancreatic ducts visualization, and SOD. The nomogram prediction model based on the above independent risk factors has good prediction ability.

摘要

目的

探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后胰腺炎(PEP)的危险因素并建立预测模型。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究。纳入2014年1月至2022年9月在临平区第一人民医院被诊断为结石性胆囊炎并接受ERCP治疗的患者(n = 998)。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归确定PEP的危险因素,并基于确定的独立危险因素建立列线图预测模型。

结果

52例患者发生PEP(5.2%)。逻辑回归分析显示,胆总管直径、PEP病史、手术时间、插管频率、胰管显影及Oddi括约肌功能障碍(SOD)是诱发PEP的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。校准曲线显示列线图模型的预测发生概率与实际发生概率一致。通过Bootstrap法计算的C指数值为0.966,表明列线图预测模型具有良好的区分能力。列线图预测模型ROC曲线的AUC为0.966(95%CI:0.857 - 0.941),表明预测效率良好,决策分析曲线显示值较高。

结论

PEP的独立危险因素为胆总管直径大、胰腺炎病史、手术时间长、插管频率高、胰管显影及SOD。基于上述独立危险因素的列线图预测模型具有良好的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/8596efdf81f9/PJMS-39-1642-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/70d55a57ea21/PJMS-39-1642-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/f063d58657f7/PJMS-39-1642-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/6405b2a3f444/PJMS-39-1642-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/8596efdf81f9/PJMS-39-1642-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/70d55a57ea21/PJMS-39-1642-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/f063d58657f7/PJMS-39-1642-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/6405b2a3f444/PJMS-39-1642-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc6/10626097/8596efdf81f9/PJMS-39-1642-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of risk factors and construction of predictive model for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的危险因素分析及预测模型构建
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Nov-Dec;39(6):1642-1646. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.7972.
2
Risk factors of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary tract diseases.胆道疾病患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的危险因素。
BMC Surg. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01953-4.
3
Risk Factors and Risk Assessment for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的危险因素和风险评估。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Apr;34(4):413-418. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.04.413.
4
Risk factors of post- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in biliary type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in Japanese patients.日本患者胆胰型 Oddi 括约肌功能障碍内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的危险因素。
J Dig Dis. 2017 Oct;18(10):591-597. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12541.
5
Analysis of risk factors and prevention strategies of post-ERCP pancreatitis.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的危险因素分析及预防策略。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Nov;21(22):5185-5190. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201711_13838.
6
Prediction of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Using 4-Hour Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Serum Amylase and Lipase Levels.使用内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后4小时血清淀粉酶和脂肪酶水平预测内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Nov;32(11):1814-1819. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1814.
7
Development and external validation of a nomogram for prediction of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.建立并验证预测内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的列线图模型。
Pancreatology. 2023 Nov;23(7):789-796. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
8
Pre- and post-procedure risk prediction models for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的术前和术后风险预测模型。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2052-2061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08491-1. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
A Risk Prediction Model for Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis After Stent Insertion for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: Development and Validation.恶性胆管梗阻支架置入术后内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的风险预测模型:构建与验证
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Apr;68(4):1574-1584. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07649-8. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
10
Incidence and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy: results from the EPISOD prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled study.疑似Oddi 括约肌功能障碍患者行胆管或双括约肌切开术的 ERCP 后胰腺炎的发生率和预测因素:来自 EPISOD 前瞻性多中心随机假对照研究的结果。
Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):884-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392418. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for achieving successful cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A technical overview.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中成功插管的策略:技术概述。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):107810. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107810.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Prevention, Diagnosis and Management.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎:预防、诊断与管理。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 12;58(9):1261. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091261.
2
Occult pancreaticobiliary reflux is a pathogenic factor of some benign biliary diseases and gallbladder cancer.隐匿性胰胆反流是一些良性胆道疾病和胆囊癌的致病因素。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2023 Jun;22(3):288-293. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
3
Risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) abdominal pain in patients without post-ERCP pancreatitis.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后无胰腺炎患者发生 ERCP 后腹痛的危险因素。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2022 Jun;21(3):285-292. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
4
Global Incidence of Acute Pancreatitis Is Increasing Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全球急性胰腺炎发病率随时间推移呈上升趋势:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Jan;162(1):122-134. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.043. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
5
Risk of Covid-19 infection during endoscopy: Efficacy of personal protective equipment (PPE) in protecting health professionals.内镜检查期间感染新冠病毒的风险:个人防护装备(PPE)对医护人员的防护效果。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):1093-1098. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.4.4057.
6
Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single-stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal.单阶段内镜下胆总管结石取出术后内镜逆行胰胆管造影术相关性胰腺炎
JGH Open. 2019 Oct 15;4(3):394-399. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12263. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Haemorrhagic versus non haemorrhagic ascites in cirrhosis: Their relationship and impact on prognosis of liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者出血性腹水与非出血性腹水的关系及其对肝硬化预后的影响
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 May-Jun;36(4):603-608. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.4.2075.
8
Three-hour post-ERCP amylase level: a useful indicator for early prediction of post-ERCP pancreatitis.ERCP 后 3 小时淀粉酶水平:预测 ERCP 后胰腺炎的有用指标。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01254-7.
9
Clinicopathologic analysis of primary gastroenteropancreatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; A ten year retrospective study of 68 cases at Moffit Cancer Center.原发性胃肠胰低分化神经内分泌癌的临床病理分析;莫菲特癌症中心68例患者的十年回顾性研究
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Jan-Feb;36(2):265-270. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.2.1336.
10
ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相关不良事件:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.