• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化姿势变化对办公人员生产力的影响:一项使用有效电脑交互作为实时指标的探索性研究。

Quantifying the impacts of posture changes on office worker productivity: an exploratory study using effective computer interactions as a real-time indicator.

机构信息

China Academy of Building Research (CABR), 30 North Third East Road, Beijing, 100013, China.

National Engineering Research Center of Building Technology, 30 North Third East Road, Beijing, 100013, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):2198. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17100-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-17100-w
PMID:37940902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10631143/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Working in a standing posture is considered to improve musculoskeletal comfort and can help enhance office workers' performance in the long term. However, there is a lack of a quantitative, real-time measure that reflects on whether office workers can immediately become more concentrated and work more efficiently when they switch to a standing posture.

METHODS

To tackle this problem, this study proposed that the number of effective computer interactions could be used as a real-time indicator to measure the productivity of office workers whose work is primarily computer-based. Using this metric, we conducted an exploratory study to investigate the correlation between posture and productivity changes at a 10-minute resolution for eight participants.

RESULTS

The study found that when allowed to use sit-stand desks to adjust postures, participants chose to switch to standing posture for about 47 min on average once a day; standing work was most frequent between 2:30 - 4:00 pm, followed by 10:30 - 11:30 am, during which time the number of computer interactions also became higher, showing a significant positive correlation. In addition, participants were approximately 6.5% more productive than when they could only work in a sitting posture.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that posture changes could have an immediate improvement in productivity.

摘要

背景

站立工作被认为可以改善肌肉骨骼舒适度,并有助于长期提高办公人员的工作效率。然而,目前缺乏一种定量的、实时的衡量标准,来反映办公人员在切换至站立姿势时是否能够立即更加集中注意力并更高效地工作。

方法

为了解决这个问题,本研究提出可以使用有效的计算机交互次数作为实时指标,来衡量以计算机为主要工作工具的办公人员的工作效率。使用这个指标,我们对 8 名参与者进行了一项探索性研究,以 10 分钟为分辨率,研究了姿势与生产力变化之间的相关性。

结果

研究发现,当允许使用坐站两用办公桌来调整姿势时,参与者平均每天会选择站立姿势工作约 47 分钟;站立工作最频繁的时间是下午 2:30 到 4:00,其次是上午 10:30 到 11:30,在此期间,计算机交互次数也变多,呈显著正相关。此外,参与者的工作效率比只能坐着工作时提高了约 6.5%。

结论

本研究表明,姿势的改变可以立即提高工作效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/460e54724620/12889_2023_17100_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/de60435bd848/12889_2023_17100_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/c0ad862c3724/12889_2023_17100_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/f56e7ee7fd41/12889_2023_17100_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/4f843a350f1b/12889_2023_17100_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/460e54724620/12889_2023_17100_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/de60435bd848/12889_2023_17100_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/c0ad862c3724/12889_2023_17100_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/f56e7ee7fd41/12889_2023_17100_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/4f843a350f1b/12889_2023_17100_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d472/10631143/460e54724620/12889_2023_17100_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the impacts of posture changes on office worker productivity: an exploratory study using effective computer interactions as a real-time indicator.量化姿势变化对办公人员生产力的影响:一项使用有效电脑交互作为实时指标的探索性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):2198. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17100-w.
2
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 20;6(6):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4.
3
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
4
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 17;12(12):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub5.
5
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1:CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub2.
6
Variation in upper extremity, neck and trunk postures when performing computer work at a sit-stand station.坐姿站立式工作站上进行计算机工作时上肢、颈部和躯干姿势的变化。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Feb;75:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
Concurrent and discriminant validity of ActiGraph waist and wrist cut-points to measure sedentary behaviour, activity level, and posture in office work.ActiGraph 腰部和腕部切点在测量办公室工作中的久坐行为、活动水平和姿势方面的同时效度和区分效度。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10387-7.
8
Desk-based workers' perspectives on using sit-stand workstations: a qualitative analysis of the Stand@Work study.坐姿工作者使用坐立交替工作站的观点:Stand@Work 研究的定性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 25;14:752. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-752.
9
The effect of sit-stand schedules on office work productivity: A pilot study.坐立交替工作模式对办公室工作效率的影响:一项初步研究。
Work. 2019;64(3):563-568. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193017.
10
Investigation of office workers' sitting behaviors in an ergonomically adjusted workstation.对符合人体工程学调整的办公环境中上班族坐姿行为的调查。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Dec;28(4):2346-2354. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1990581. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Between Pain Intensity and Trunk Sway in Seated Posture Among Office Workers with Chronic Spinal Pain: A Pilot Field-Based Study.慢性脊柱疼痛上班族坐姿下疼痛强度与躯干摆动的相关性:一项基于现场的初步研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 5;25(5):1583. doi: 10.3390/s25051583.
2
Exploring Associations Between Device-Based Occupational Sedentary Behavior and Need for Recovery in White Collar Workers: A Compositional Data-Analysis.基于设备的职业久坐行为与白领恢复需求之间的关联研究:一种组合数据分析。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;69:1607322. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607322. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Workplace Interventions on Low Back Pain in Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.工作场所干预对工人腰痛的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):12614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312614.
2
Usage of sit-stand workstations: Benefits and barriers from decision makers' perspective in Australia.坐姿站立工作站的使用:来自澳大利亚决策者视角的收益和障碍。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Jul;94:103426. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103426. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
3
Sedentary behaviour and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews.
成年人的久坐行为与健康:系统综述概述。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Oct;45(10 (Suppl. 2)):S197-S217. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0272.
4
Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作场所久坐行为与生产力:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 8;17(18):6535. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186535.
5
Brain activity during a working memory task in different postures: an EEG study.不同姿势下工作记忆任务中的大脑活动:一项 EEG 研究。
Ergonomics. 2020 Nov;63(11):1359-1370. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1784467. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
6
Natural Patterns of Sitting, Standing and Stepping During and Outside Work-Differences between Habitual Users and Non-Users of Sit-Stand Workstations.自然坐姿、站姿和步态习惯:使用与不使用坐站交替式工作站人群的区别
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 8;17(11):4075. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114075.
7
Effects of risk factors related to computer use on musculoskeletal pain in office workers.与电脑使用相关的风险因素对办公室职员肌肉骨骼疼痛的影响。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Mar;28(1):269-274. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1765112. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
The effect of sit-stand desks on office worker behavioral and health outcomes: A scoping review.可调节高度办公桌对办公人员行为和健康结果的影响:范围综述。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:37-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
9
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 17;12(12):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub5.
10
Effectiveness of the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work intervention: cluster randomised controlled trial.站立更多 AT(SMArT)工作干预的有效性: 集群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 10;363:k3870. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3870.