• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

坐姿站立工作站的使用:来自澳大利亚决策者视角的收益和障碍。

Usage of sit-stand workstations: Benefits and barriers from decision makers' perspective in Australia.

机构信息

The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.

The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2021 Jul;94:103426. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103426. Epub 2021 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103426
PMID:33848811
Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional mixed-method study was to understand the current use, and practices to support the implementation, of sit-stand workstations (SSWs) from the perspective of furniture purchasing decision makers in Australian organisations. An online survey, and in-depth interviews with a purposive sub-sample were conducted. A total of 216 eligible participants from 150 organisations across 18 sectors completed the survey with 17 interviews conducted. 40% of organisations provided SSWs on request while 41% reported not using them appropriately. Over half provided no training on the appropriate use of SSWs (n = 109, 51%) nor used any strategies to enhance their use (n = 163, 84%). From the interviews, SSWs were perceived effective in reducing discomforts and increasing employees' satisfaction and productivity. Lack of resources and guidelines to support SSW usage, and lack of wellbeing knowledge, were identified as barriers. Education and ongoing monitoring are important to enhance the appropriate use and uptake of SSWs.

摘要

本横断面混合方法研究的目的是从澳大利亚组织中家具采购决策者的角度了解坐站式工作站 (SSW) 的当前使用情况和支持实施的实践。我们进行了在线调查和对目的抽样的深入访谈。共有来自 18 个行业的 150 个组织的 216 名符合条件的参与者完成了调查,并进行了 17 次访谈。40%的组织根据要求提供 SSW,而 41%的组织报告称没有正确使用它们。超过一半的组织没有提供有关 SSW 正确使用的培训 (n=109, 51%),也没有使用任何策略来增强其使用 (n=163, 84%)。从访谈中可以看出,SSW 可以有效减轻不适,提高员工的满意度和生产力。缺乏支持 SSW 使用的资源和指南,以及缺乏健康知识,被认为是障碍。教育和持续监测对于提高 SSW 的正确使用和采用非常重要。

相似文献

1
Usage of sit-stand workstations: Benefits and barriers from decision makers' perspective in Australia.坐姿站立工作站的使用:来自澳大利亚决策者视角的收益和障碍。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Jul;94:103426. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103426. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
2
Factors impacting workplace investment in sit-stand workstations from the perspective of purchasing decision-makers.从采购决策者的角度看影响工作场所投资坐立工作站的因素。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103558. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103558. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Desk-based workers' perspectives on using sit-stand workstations: a qualitative analysis of the Stand@Work study.坐姿工作者使用坐立交替工作站的观点:Stand@Work 研究的定性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 25;14:752. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-752.
4
The user and non-user perspective: Experiences of office workers with long-term access to sit-stand workstations.用户和非用户视角:长期使用坐站工作站的办公人员的体验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236582. eCollection 2020.
5
The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers' sitting time: results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot.坐站两用工作站对改变办公室职员久坐时间的有效性:“站立工作”随机对照试验试点的结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Oct 8;11:127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0127-7.
6
Usage of Sit-Stand Workstations and Associations Between Work and Nonwork Sitting Time: An Observational Study.坐姿工作站的使用与工作和非工作坐姿时间之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 May;60(5):e268-e272. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001252.
7
Long-Term Access to Sit-Stand Workstations in a Large Office Population: User Profiles Reveal Differences in Sitting Time and Perceptions.长期使用坐立工作站对大型办公人群的影响:用户特征揭示了坐姿时间和感受的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 15;15(9):2019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15092019.
8
What strategies do desk-based workers choose to reduce sitting time and how well do they work? Findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial.久坐办公族选择了哪些策略来减少久坐时间,这些策略效果如何?一项整群随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Oct 12;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0731-z.
9
The effect of a sit-stand workstation intervention on daily sitting, standing and physical activity: protocol for a 12 month workplace randomised control trial.坐站式工作站干预对日常坐姿、站姿和身体活动的影响:一项为期12个月的工作场所随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 15;15:152. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1506-y.
10
"Why would you want to stand?" an account of the lived experience of employees taking part in a workplace sit-stand desk intervention.员工参与工作场所坐立桌干预的生活体验述评:为何要站立?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 17;19(1):1692. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8038-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the impacts of posture changes on office worker productivity: an exploratory study using effective computer interactions as a real-time indicator.量化姿势变化对办公人员生产力的影响:一项使用有效电脑交互作为实时指标的探索性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):2198. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17100-w.
2
How supportive are workplace environments for sitting less and moving more? A descriptive study of Australian workplaces participating in the BeUpstanding program.工作场所环境对减少久坐和增加活动的支持程度如何?一项对参与“积极起来”计划的澳大利亚工作场所的描述性研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Oct 25;24:101616. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101616. eCollection 2021 Dec.