Suppr超能文献

城市固体废弃物填埋场衬垫性能评估

Assessment of Municipal Solid-Waste Landfill Liner Performance.

作者信息

Jain Pradeep, Winslow Kevin M, Townsend Timothy G, Krause Max, Tolaymat Thabet M

机构信息

Innovative Waste Consulting Services, LLC, 3720 NW 43rd St., Suite 103, Gainesville, FL 32606.

Dept. of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 116450, Gainesville, FL 32611-6450.

出版信息

J Environ Eng (New York). 2023 Sep;149(9):1-9. doi: 10.1061/joeedu.eeeng-7218.

Abstract

The leachate collection system (LCS) and leak detection system (LDS) flow rate data from 240 cells (or a combination of cells) at 54 municipal solid-waste landfills (located in seven US states) with double-liner systems were analyzed to assess the performance of the primary liner system. The average LCS leachate collection rates for the study sites ranged from 380 L ha day (40.7 gal. acre day) to 22,400 L ha day (2,390 gal. acre day) on a sitewide basis, and the average LDS leachate collection rates ranged from 1.8 L ha day (0.2 gal. acre day) to 577 L ha day (61.7 gal. acre day) on a sitewide basis. Assuming all leachate generated is collected either by the LCS or LDS, the data suggest that the primary liner systems' aggregated efficiency is over 98%. The collection efficiency at sites that used a composite liner (geomembrane underlain by a geosynthetic clay liner or a compacted clay liner) system was not statistically different from the sites that used only a geomembrane as the primary liner (geomembrane underlain by a permeable layer) (median of 99% for both types). Leakage rates were compared with those estimated from the equations used by the hydrologic evaluation of landfill performance (HELP) model. The comparison suggests that the equations used by the HELP model to estimate leakage through the liner overestimate the leakage rate through geomembrane primary liners but underestimate the leakage rate through composite primary liners based on the HELP-model-default defect size and suggested defect frequency. It is also possible that groundwater intrusion could contribute to a portion of the leachate collected from the LDS because leachate quality data collected from a few sites indicated the LCS leachate had a higher concentration of most constituents than the leachate collected from LDS.

摘要

对位于美国七个州的54座设有双层衬垫系统的城市固体废弃物填埋场中240个单元(或单元组合)的渗滤液收集系统(LCS)和渗漏检测系统(LDS)的流速数据进行了分析,以评估主衬垫系统的性能。在整个场地范围内,研究场地的LCS渗滤液平均收集率为380升/公顷·天(40.7加仑/英亩·天)至22400升/公顷·天(2390加仑/英亩·天),LDS渗滤液平均收集率为1.8升/公顷·天(0.2加仑/英亩·天)至577升/公顷·天(61.7加仑/英亩·天)。假设产生的所有渗滤液均由LCS或LDS收集,数据表明主衬垫系统的综合效率超过98%。使用复合衬垫(由土工合成黏土衬垫或压实黏土衬垫作为底层的土工膜)系统的场地的收集效率与仅使用土工膜作为主衬垫(由渗透层作为底层的土工膜)的场地相比,在统计学上没有差异(两种类型的中位数均为99%)。将渗漏率与填埋场性能水文评估(HELP)模型所使用方程估算的渗漏率进行了比较。比较结果表明,基于HELP模型默认缺陷尺寸和建议缺陷频率,HELP模型用于估算通过衬垫的渗漏率的方程高估了通过土工膜主衬垫的渗漏率,但低估了通过复合主衬垫的渗漏率。还有可能是地下水侵入导致了从LDS收集的部分渗滤液,因为从一些场地收集的渗滤液质量数据表明,LCS渗滤液中大多数成分的浓度高于从LDS收集的渗滤液。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Municipal Solid-Waste Landfill Liner Performance.城市固体废弃物填埋场衬垫性能评估
J Environ Eng (New York). 2023 Sep;149(9):1-9. doi: 10.1061/joeedu.eeeng-7218.
6
Steady-state analytical models for performance assessment of landfill composite liners.用于填埋场复合衬垫性能评估的稳态分析模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Aug;22(16):12198-214. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4200-9. Epub 2015 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验