• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

少数族裔低收入社区使用门户网站和远程医疗的相关因素:混合方法研究

Factors Associated With Portal and Telehealth Uptake and Use in a Minoritized, Low-Income Community: Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Higashi Robin T, Repasky Emily C, Gupta Antara, Lee MinJae, DesRoches Catherine M, Israel Aimee, Pruitt Sandi L

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Peter O'Donnell Jr School of Public Health, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, United States, 1 214 648-3645, 1 214-648-3934.

Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 31;9:e70146. doi: 10.2196/70146.

DOI:10.2196/70146
PMID:40743511
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12313082/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence that use of patient portals and telehealth is associated with many health benefits, disparities exist in awareness, adoption, and use. Understanding factors and strategies specific to underserved populations is key to achieving digital equity and better health.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses portal and telehealth experiences among residents of a minoritized and lower-resource area of Dallas, Texas.

METHODS

Using an explanatory sequential design, we conducted surveys and semistructured interviews with English- and Spanish-speaking adults in 15 ZIP Codes surrounding a community-based clinic. We recruited participants via a patient portal, flyers, emails distributed by clinic and community partners, and in person. Surveys were offered online and on paper. We used Fisher exact tests to identify factors associated with telehealth and/or portal use. We also recruited a subsample of survey participants to expound on survey findings in semistructured interviews. Our thematic analysis assessed convergence in survey and interview findings.

RESULTS

Among 182 survey respondents, most were older (n=109, 66%; age ≥60 years), African American or Black (n=120, 65%), and female (n=142, 79%); a little more than half (n=97, 54%) had completed ≥1 telehealth appointment, and a majority (n=131, 72%) had used a patient portal at least once. Compared with those who used the portal and/or telehealth, those reporting no use of portal or telehealth were more likely to have a high school education or less (P<.001) or be Spanish speakers (P<.011). A majority, regardless of portal or telehealth use, agreed with health promotion activity survey statements like "Using the Internet for health-related activities makes me feel actively involved with my health care" (n=103, 59%) and "I find the Internet useful for monitoring my health" (n=100, 58%). In interviews with 20 individuals, most of whom were older, Black, female, and had digital technology experience, seven factors were key to increased engagement in portals and telehealth: (1) improving patient autonomy, (2) integrating digital health technology into daily life, (3) receiving recommendations from trusted individuals, (4) appreciating the value of digital health technologies, (5) enlisting the support of care partners or peers, (6) managing severe or chronic illness, and (7) accessing test results rapidly.

CONCLUSIONS

This study builds on previous work by confirming and contributing insights about factors key to technology uptake and use among underserved populations. Interventions using digital health technologies should focus on these factors to promote digital and health equity and achieve better health outcomes. Future research should explore which clinical settings and contexts are most conducive to increasing digital technology uptake and use, and implementation should leverage partnerships with community groups.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b26/12313082/a2284fd5660b/formative-v9-e70146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b26/12313082/a2284fd5660b/formative-v9-e70146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b26/12313082/a2284fd5660b/formative-v9-e70146-g001.jpg
摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明使用患者门户网站和远程医疗有诸多健康益处,但在认知、采用和使用方面仍存在差异。了解特定于服务不足人群的因素和策略是实现数字公平和改善健康的关键。

目的

本研究评估了得克萨斯州达拉斯一个少数族裔且资源较少地区居民的门户网站和远程医疗体验。

方法

采用解释性序列设计,我们对社区诊所周边15个邮政编码区域内讲英语和西班牙语的成年人进行了调查和半结构化访谈。我们通过患者门户网站、传单、诊所和社区合作伙伴发送的电子邮件以及亲自招募参与者。调查以在线和纸质形式提供。我们使用Fisher精确检验来确定与远程医疗和/或门户网站使用相关的因素。我们还招募了一部分调查参与者作为子样本,以便在半结构化访谈中详细阐述调查结果。我们的主题分析评估了调查和访谈结果的一致性。

结果

在182名调查受访者中,大多数年龄较大(n = 109,66%;年龄≥60岁),非裔美国人或黑人(n = 120,65%),女性(n = 142,79%);略多于一半(n = 97,54%)的人完成了≥1次远程医疗预约,大多数(n = 131,72%)至少使用过一次患者门户网站。与使用门户网站和/或远程医疗的人相比,那些表示未使用门户网站或远程医疗的人更有可能只有高中及以下学历(P <.001)或讲西班牙语(P <.011)。无论是否使用门户网站或远程医疗,大多数人都同意健康促进活动调查中的陈述,如“使用互联网进行与健康相关的活动让我感觉积极参与了自己的医疗保健”(n = 103,59%)和“我发现互联网对监测我的健康很有用”(n = 100,58%)。在对20个人的访谈中,大多数人年龄较大、是黑人、女性且有数字技术经验,七个因素是增加门户网站和远程医疗参与度的关键:(1)提高患者自主性,(2)将数字健康技术融入日常生活,(3)接受来自可信赖个人的建议,(4)认识到数字健康技术的价值,(5)争取护理伙伴或同伴的支持,(6)管理严重或慢性疾病,(7)快速获取检测结果。

结论

本研究在先前工作的基础上,确认并提供了关于服务不足人群采用和使用技术的关键因素的见解。使用数字健康技术的干预措施应关注这些因素,以促进数字和健康公平并实现更好的健康结果。未来的研究应探索哪些临床环境和背景最有利于增加数字技术的采用和使用,并且实施应利用与社区团体的伙伴关系。

相似文献

1
Factors Associated With Portal and Telehealth Uptake and Use in a Minoritized, Low-Income Community: Mixed Methods Study.少数族裔低收入社区使用门户网站和远程医疗的相关因素:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 31;9:e70146. doi: 10.2196/70146.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
9
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Recommendations to Address Barriers to Patient Portal Use Among Persons With Diabetes Seeking Care at Community Health Centers: Interview Study With Patients and Health Care Providers.解决社区卫生中心糖尿病患者使用患者门户网站障碍的建议:对患者和医疗服务提供者的访谈研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Sep 16;9:e58526. doi: 10.2196/58526.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital Health Technology Use Among Spanish Speakers in the US: A Scoping Review.美国说西班牙语人群对数字健康技术的使用:一项范围综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10386.
2
Using Social Media to Engage and Enroll Underrepresented Populations: Longitudinal Digital Health Research.利用社交媒体吸引和招募代表性不足的人群:纵向数字健康研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 15;9:e68093. doi: 10.2196/68093.
3
The gaps and challenges in digital health technology use as perceived by patients: a scoping review and narrative meta-synthesis.
患者所感知的数字健康技术使用中的差距与挑战:一项范围综述与叙述性元综合分析
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 27;7:1474956. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1474956. eCollection 2025.
4
Traditional and Online Health Information Seeking Among Individuals With Limited English Proficiency in the United States: Cross-Sectional Study.美国英语水平有限的个体获取传统和在线健康信息的情况:横断面研究
Am J Health Promot. 2025 Mar;39(3):469-478. doi: 10.1177/08901171241302011. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
5
Telehealth service use and quality of care among US adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional study of the 2022 health information national trends survey.美国成年人糖尿病患者的远程医疗服务使用情况和护理质量:2022 年健康信息国家趋势调查的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 3;14(10):e086418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086418.
6
Future of Telemedicine in Radiation Oncology.远程医疗在放射肿瘤学中的未来。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2024 Oct;34(4):463-467. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.07.010.
7
How Do We Better Serve Excluded Populations When Delivering Digital Health Technology? Inclusion Evaluation of a Digital Musculoskeletal Self-Management Solution.在提供数字健康技术时,我们如何更好地为被排斥的人群服务?数字肌肉骨骼自我管理解决方案的包容性评估。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Sep;22(3):e1925. doi: 10.1002/msc.1925.
8
Recommendations to advance digital health equity: a systematic review of qualitative studies.推进数字健康公平性的建议:定性研究的系统评价
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jun 29;7(1):173. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01177-7.
9
Declines in Telemedicine Use Among Adults: United States, 2021 and 2022.远程医疗使用率下降:美国,2021 年和 2022 年。
Natl Health Stat Report. 2024 Jun(205):1-11.
10
Telemedicine in Cardiology: Enhancing Access to Care and Improving Patient Outcomes.心脏病学中的远程医疗:增加医疗服务可及性并改善患者治疗效果。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 21;16(6):e62852. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62852. eCollection 2024 Jun.