• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响结直肠癌患者一级亲属结肠镜筛查的因素:一项混合方法系统评价。

Factors affecting colonoscopy screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: A mixed-method systematic review.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Jun;21(3):245-252. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12689. Epub 2023 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1111/wvn.12689
PMID:37950436
Abstract

BACKGROUND

First-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients have a higher risk of developing CRC than the general population. Ensuring that these at-risk populations receive colonoscopy screening is an effective strategy for reducing the increased risk, but the rates remain low. Colonoscopy screening behavior is influenced by factors at multiple levels. However, most previous reviews failed to review them and their interactions systematically.

AIMS

To explore factors influencing FDRs' colonoscopy screening behavior according to the ecological model.

METHOD

A mixed-method systematic review was performed in accordance with The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using eight bibliographic databases (Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Data, and China Biology Medicine) for the period from January 1995 to February 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists were applied to assess studies qualities. A convergent integrated approach was used for data synthesis and integration.

RESULTS

In total, 24 articles reporting on 23 studies were included. Only one study was rated low quality, and the other 22 studies were rated moderate to high quality. The findings revealed that certain factors and their interactions affected FDRs' colonoscopy screening behaviors according to the ecological model, including misconceptions about CRC and colonoscopy, concerns about the procedure, perceived susceptibility to developing CRC, health motivation, fear of CRC, fatalism, the recommendation from CRC patients, and recommendations from physicians, colonoscopy schedules, cancer taboo, health insurance and cost of colonoscopy.

LINK EVIDENCE TO ACTION

Family communication-centered multilevel interventions are recommended to promote colonoscopy screening behavior among FDRs of CRC patients.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)患者的一级亲属(FDR)比一般人群患 CRC 的风险更高。确保这些高危人群接受结肠镜筛查是降低风险的有效策略,但筛查率仍然较低。结肠镜筛查行为受到多个层次因素的影响。然而,大多数先前的综述未能系统地审查这些因素及其相互作用。

目的

根据生态模型探讨影响 FDR 结肠镜筛查行为的因素。

方法

根据《系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南,进行了混合方法系统综述。使用 8 个文献数据库(Medline、EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据和中国生物医学文献数据库),对 1995 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月期间的文献进行了全面检索。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的批判性评估清单评估研究质量。采用融合综合方法进行数据综合和整合。

结果

共纳入 24 篇报告 23 项研究的文章。仅有 1 项研究被评为低质量,其余 22 项研究被评为中高质量。研究结果表明,根据生态模型,某些因素及其相互作用会影响 FDR 结肠镜筛查行为,包括对 CRC 和结肠镜检查的误解、对程序的担忧、对患 CRC 的易感性感知、健康动机、对 CRC 的恐惧、宿命论、CRC 患者的建议和医生的建议、结肠镜检查时间表、癌症禁忌、健康保险和结肠镜检查的费用。

将证据转化为行动

建议开展以家庭沟通为中心的多层次干预,以促进 CRC 患者 FDR 的结肠镜筛查行为。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting colonoscopy screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: A mixed-method systematic review.影响结直肠癌患者一级亲属结肠镜筛查的因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Jun;21(3):245-252. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12689. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.结直肠癌的化学预防:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(32):1-206. doi: 10.3310/hta14320.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Systematic Review.COVID-19 大流行对结直肠癌筛查的影响:系统评价。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Sep;53(3):730-744. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00679-x. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
10
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing factors of colonoscopy screening in first-degree relatives of hospitalized colorectal cancer patients and preliminary clinical practices to improve the compliance.住院结直肠癌患者一级亲属结肠镜筛查的影响因素及提高依从性的初步临床实践
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 28;15:1533475. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1533475. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring factors influencing decision making for colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods study.探索影响结直肠癌患者一级亲属结肠镜检查决策的因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21820-6.
3
Colonoscopy Screening Behavior in First-Degree Relatives of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.
结直肠癌患者一级亲属的结肠镜筛查行为:一项基于计划行为理论的定性研究
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241305344. doi: 10.1177/00469580241305344.