College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Clin Exp Optom. 2024 Sep;107(7):709-715. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2023.2279190. Epub 2023 Nov 12.
The support of students with a vision impairment throughout education could be enhanced by assessing the functional reading ability of the individual. This visual assessment could inform educators of individualised student needs and potentially improve the academic achievement for these students.
Support for children with a vision impairment within a classroom is typically based on clinical findings of distance visual acuity and visual fields. Therefore, determining optimal print size for reading is essential to ensure best academic outcomes. Secondary aims were to investigate the possible impact of underlying pathology on reading ability.
Forty-seven participants were recruited from a state-wide support service for children with a vision impairment in South Australia. Three visual acuity groups were formed based on World Health Organisation definitions of mild, moderate, and severe vision impairment. Correlation between clinical measures of distance visual acuity using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test, were compared with reading acuity and critical print size (smallest font before reading speed reduced) using Minnesota low vision reading chart (MNREAD).
No significant correlations were found for mild (0.20-0.49 logMAR) and severe (1.00-1.52 logMAR) vision impairment groups between distance visual acuity and reading acuity read ( = .64, CI [-.585, .395]/ = .82, CI [-.48, .58]) or critical print size , CI [-.57, .45]/ = .43, CI [-.34, .68]. A significant correlation was found for the moderate vision impairment group: 0.50-0.99 logMAR for minimum reading acuity < .001, CI [.44, .91]) and critical print size ( = .03, CI [.05, .80]).
Standard clinical measures of distance visual acuity are an unpredictable estimate of reading ability in children with mild and severe vision impairment. Additional measures of functional near reading ability could provide a more meaningful indicator of reading ability and help provide optimum support to students through education.
通过评估个体的功能性阅读能力,可以增强对有视力障碍学生的支持。这种视觉评估可以让教育工作者了解学生的个体需求,并有可能提高这些学生的学业成绩。
在课堂上为有视力障碍的儿童提供支持通常基于距离视力和视野的临床发现。因此,确定阅读的最佳字体大小对于确保最佳学习成果至关重要。次要目标是研究潜在病理对阅读能力的可能影响。
从南澳大利亚州为视力障碍儿童提供的全州支持服务中招募了 47 名参与者。根据世界卫生组织对轻度、中度和重度视力障碍的定义,将参与者分为三组。使用弗赖堡视力测试比较距离视力的临床测量值与阅读视力和临界印刷尺寸(阅读速度降低前最小字体)的相关性,使用明尼苏达州低视力阅读图表(MNREAD)。
在轻度(0.20-0.49 logMAR)和重度(1.00-1.52 logMAR)视力障碍组中,距离视力与阅读视力之间没有发现显著相关性(r =.64,CI [-.585,.395]/r =.82,CI [-.48,.58])或临界印刷尺寸,CI [-.57,.45]/r =.43,CI [-.34,.68]。中度视力障碍组存在显著相关性:最小阅读视力 < .001,CI [.44,.91]) 和临界印刷尺寸(r =.03,CI [.05,.80])。
标准的距离视力临床测量值是对轻度和重度视力障碍儿童阅读能力的不可预测估计。功能性近读能力的额外测量可以提供更有意义的阅读能力指标,并通过教育为学生提供最佳支持。