• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受透析治疗患者的生存分析。

Survival analysis of patients undergoing dialysis.

作者信息

Held P J, Pauly M V, Diamond L

出版信息

JAMA. 1987 Feb 6;257(5):645-50.

PMID:3795446
Abstract

We analyzed the five-year survival of 4661 patients with end-stage renal disease whose first dialysis occurred in 1977. The analysis incorporated characteristics of patients and dialysis institutions. Results showed that mortality was positively correlated with patient age, initial conditions leading to renal failure, being male and white, open staffing, and the number of staff physicians. In addition, lower death rates were observed for patients treated in larger dialysis units and units that had been long-term reusers of dialyzers. Patients treated in for-profit and not-for-profit units appeared to have the same mortality, although patients treated in freestanding units had lower mortality. The direction of causation was not always clear in these results.

摘要

我们分析了1977年首次进行透析的4661例终末期肾病患者的五年生存率。该分析纳入了患者和透析机构的特征。结果显示,死亡率与患者年龄、导致肾衰竭的初始状况、男性和白人、开放式人员配备以及 staff physicians 的数量呈正相关。此外,在较大的透析单位和长期复用透析器的单位接受治疗的患者死亡率较低。营利性和非营利性单位治疗的患者死亡率似乎相同,尽管独立单位治疗的患者死亡率较低。这些结果中因果关系的方向并不总是明确的。 (注:原文中“staff physicians”直译为“ staff 医生”,不太明确具体准确含义,可结合上下文进一步优化表述,但按要求未做修改)

相似文献

1
Survival analysis of patients undergoing dialysis.接受透析治疗患者的生存分析。
JAMA. 1987 Feb 6;257(5):645-50.
2
Effect of dialyzer reuse on survival of patients treated with hemodialysis.透析器复用对接受血液透析治疗患者生存率的影响。
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):620-5.
3
[The Veneto Region's Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation: 2006-2007 report].[威尼托地区透析与移植登记处:2006 - 2007年报告]
G Ital Nefrol. 2009 Nov-Dec;26 Suppl 48:S5-56.
4
Characteristics and treatment of patients not reusing dialyzers in reuse units.复用透析单元中不复用透析器患者的特征及治疗
Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 Nov;36(5):991-9. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2000.19101.
5
Associations between CMS's Clinical Performance Measures project benchmarks, profit structure, and mortality in dialysis units.医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的临床绩效指标项目基准、利润结构与透析单位死亡率之间的关联。
Kidney Int. 2006 Jun;69(11):2094-100. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000267.
6
Temporal Changes in Mortality Risk by Dialysis Modality in the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis Population.澳大利亚和新西兰透析人群中透析方式与死亡率风险的时间变化。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Sep;66(3):489-98. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
Mortality, Hospitalization, and Technique Failure in Daily Home Hemodialysis and Matched Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Matched Cohort Study.每日居家血液透析与匹配腹膜透析患者的死亡率、住院率和技术失败率:一项匹配队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Jan;67(1):98-110. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Body mass index, dialysis modality, and survival: analysis of the United States Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave II Study.体重指数、透析方式与生存率:美国肾脏数据系统透析发病率和死亡率第二波研究分析
Kidney Int. 2004 Feb;65(2):597-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00385.x.
9
Effect of the ownership of dialysis facilities on patients' survival and referral for transplantation.透析设施所有权对患者生存及移植转诊的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 25;341(22):1653-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911253412205.
10
Daily variation in death in patients treated by long-term dialysis: comparison of in-center hemodialysis to peritoneal and home hemodialysis.长期透析治疗患者的死亡日变化:中心血液透析与腹膜和家庭血液透析的比较。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Jan;61(1):96-103. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in excess mortality among adults with diabetes-related end-stage kidney disease: a comparison between the USA and Australia.糖尿病相关终末期肾病成人患者超额死亡率的变化:美国与澳大利亚的比较。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Sep 22;37(10):2004-2013. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab315.
2
Long-term mortality among kidney transplant recipients with and without diabetes: a nationwide cohort study in the USA.美国全国范围内队列研究:糖尿病与非糖尿病肾移植受者的长期死亡率。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001962.
3
Epidemiology of COVID-19 Infection in Hospitalized End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients in a Predominantly African-American Population.
COVID-19 感染在以非裔美国人为主的住院终末期肾病患者中的流行病学研究。
Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(3):190-198. doi: 10.1159/000514752. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
4
Race and Mortality in CKD and Dialysis: Findings From the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study.种族与慢性肾脏病和透析患者的死亡率:来自慢性肾功能不全队列(CRIC)研究的发现。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Mar;75(3):394-403. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Clinical and microbiological effects of dialyzers reuse in hemodialysis patients.透析器复用对血液透析患者的临床及微生物学影响。
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Jul-Sep;41(3):384-392. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0151. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Survival of Children with ESRD.终末期肾病患儿生存中的种族和民族差异
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 May;28(5):1584-1591. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016060706. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
Younger black patients have a higher risk of infection mortality that is mostly non-dialysis related: A national study of cause-specific mortality among U.S. maintenance dialysis patients.年轻的黑人患者感染死亡率较高,且大多与透析无关:一项关于美国维持性透析患者特定病因死亡率的全国性研究。
Hemodial Int. 2017 Apr;21(2):232-242. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12469. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
8
Outcome in noncritically ill patients with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis: Effects of differing medical staffs and organizations.需要透析的非重症急性肾损伤患者的预后:不同医护人员和组织的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(30):e4277. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004277.
9
Race/Ethnicity and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults With CKD: Findings From the CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) and Hispanic CRIC Studies.慢性肾脏病成年患者的种族/族裔与心血管结局:慢性肾功能不全队列(CRIC)研究及西班牙裔CRIC研究的结果
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Oct;68(4):545-553. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.429. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
Association of Ca×PO4 product with levels of serum C-reactive protein in regular hemodialysis patients.规律血液透析患者中钙磷乘积与血清C反应蛋白水平的关联
J Renal Inj Prev. 2012 Sep 1;1(2):55-9. doi: 10.12861/jrip.2012.20. eCollection 2012.