Jennifer Mnookin is chancellor and professor of law at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Science. 2023 Nov 17;382(6672):741. doi: 10.1126/science.adm8834. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
Courts in the United States have increasingly relied on scientific evidence and expert testimony to help resolve questions of fact. On 1 December 2023, amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 will take effect, further clarifying the court's responsibilities as a gatekeeper for expert evidence. This update comes just a few months after the 30-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark decision on how federal judges should evaluate scientific evidence. was hailed as a victory for the use of scientific information in the legal system and certainly cast a much-needed spotlight on scientific evidence in the courtroom. But the nuanced and flexible nature of the "Daubert standard" has since led to substantial inconsistencies in its application. Most strikingly, it has had far more impact in civil cases than criminal cases. 's core tenet-that scientific evidence introduced in court should be adequately valid and reliable-needs to be taken just as seriously in the criminal justice system and for forensic science as it has been in civil cases.
美国法院越来越依赖科学证据和专家证言来帮助解决事实问题。2023 年 12 月 1 日,《联邦证据规则》第 702 条修正案将生效,进一步明确了法院作为专家证据守门人的责任。此次更新是在最高法院就联邦法官应如何评估科学证据做出具有里程碑意义的裁决 30 周年之后几个月进行的。被誉为在法律体系中使用科学信息的胜利,当然也为法庭上的科学证据提供了急需的关注。但“多伯特标准”的细微和灵活性质导致其应用存在很大的不一致。最引人注目的是,它在民事案件中的影响远远超过刑事案件。“Daubert 标准”的核心原则——法庭上引入的科学证据应该充分有效和可靠——在刑事司法系统和法医学中也需要像在民事案件中那样受到重视。