Tsingos Cherie, Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia, Lonie John M, Smith Lorraine
The University of Sydney Faculty of Pharmacy, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney Sydney Medical School, Australia ; The University of Sydney Sydney Medical School, Australia.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Oct 25;79(8):124. doi: 10.5688/ajpe798124.
OBJECTIVE. To research the literature and examine assessment strategies used in health education that measure reflection levels and to identify assessment strategies for use in pharmacy education. METHODS. A simple systematic review using a 5-step approach was employed to locate peer-reviewed articles addressing assessment strategies in health education from the last 20 years. RESULTS. The literature search identified assessment strategies and rubrics used in health education for assessing levels of reflection. There is a significant gap in the literature regarding reflective rubric use in pharmacy education. CONCLUSION. Two assessment strategies to assess levels of reflection, including a reflective rubric tailored for pharmacy education, are proposed.
目的。检索文献并审视健康教育中用于衡量反思水平的评估策略,确定药学教育中可采用的评估策略。方法。采用一种五步简单系统评价法来查找过去20年中探讨健康教育评估策略的同行评议文章。结果。文献检索确定了健康教育中用于评估反思水平的评估策略和评分标准。关于药学教育中使用反思评分标准的文献存在显著空白。结论。提出了两种用于评估反思水平的评估策略,包括一种为药学教育量身定制的反思评分标准。