Suppr超能文献

针吸活检中 Gleason 评分 9 - 10 分前列腺腺癌的预后:一项基于全国人口的研究

Prognosis of Gleason Score 9-10 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in Needle Biopsies: A Nationwide Population-based Study.

作者信息

Egevad Lars, Micoli Chiara, Samaratunga Hemamali, Delahunt Brett, Garmo Hans, Stattin Pär, Eklund Martin

机构信息

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Apr;7(2):213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.002. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2014, prostate cancer is reported using five-tier grouping of Gleason scores. Studies have suggested prognostic heterogeneity within the groups.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the risk of prostate cancer death for men diagnosed with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 on needle biopsy in a population-based cohort.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used the data from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) 4.0 for a survival analysis. Among 199 620 men reported to have prostate cancer in 2000-2020, 172 112 were diagnosed on needle biopsy. The primary treatment was classified as androgen deprivation therapy (66%), deferred treatment (5%), radical prostatectomy (7%), or radical radiotherapy (21%).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The risks of death from prostate cancer in men with Gleason score 9-10 at 5 and 10 yr were used as endpoints. Multivariable Cox regression models controlling for socioeconomic factors and primary treatment were used for time-to-event analyses of death from prostate cancer and death from any causes.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 20 419 (12%) men had a Gleason score of 9-10, including Gleason scores of 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 in 14 333 (70%), 4223 (21%), and 1863 (9%) men, respectively. The risks of prostate cancer death for men with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 at 10 yr of follow-up were 0.45 (confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.46), 0.56 (0.55-0.58), and 0.66 (0.63-0.68), respectively. The risks of death of any cause for men with Gleason scores 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5 at 10 yr were 0.73 (CI 0.72-0.74), 0.81 (0.80-0.83), and 0.87 (0.85-0.89), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate in the largest and most complete cohort analyzed to date that collapsing the Gleason scores by grouping results in loss of prognostic information in men with Gleason score 9-10 cancer.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Survival of prostate cancer patients with the highest tumor grades varies depending on grade composition.

摘要

背景

自2014年以来,前列腺癌采用Gleason评分的五级分组报告。研究表明各分组内存在预后异质性。

目的

我们在一项基于人群的队列研究中评估了经穿刺活检诊断为Gleason评分4+5、5+4和5+5的男性前列腺癌死亡风险。

设计、研究地点和参与者:我们使用瑞典前列腺癌数据库(PCBaSe)4.0的数据进行生存分析。在2000年至2020年报告患有前列腺癌的199620名男性中,172112名是经穿刺活检诊断的。主要治疗方法分为雄激素剥夺治疗(66%)、延迟治疗(5%)、根治性前列腺切除术(7%)或根治性放疗(21%)。

结局测量和统计分析

将Gleason评分9-10的男性在5年和10年时前列腺癌死亡风险作为终点。使用控制社会经济因素和主要治疗方法的多变量Cox回归模型对前列腺癌死亡和任何原因死亡进行事件发生时间分析。

结果与局限性

共有20419名(12%)男性Gleason评分为9-10,其中Gleason评分4+5、5+4和5+5的男性分别有14333名(70%)、4223名(21%)和1863名(9%)。随访10年时,Gleason评分4+5、5+4和5+5的男性前列腺癌死亡风险分别为0.45(置信区间[CI]0.44-0.46)、0.56(0.55-0.58)和0.66(0.63-0.68)。随访10年时,Gleason评分4+5、5+4和5+5的男性任何原因死亡风险分别为0.73(CI 0.72-0.74)、0.81(0.80-0.83)和0.87(0.85-0.89)。

结论

我们在迄今为止分析的最大且最完整的队列中证明,通过分组合并Gleason评分会导致Gleason评分9-10癌症男性的预后信息丢失。

患者总结

肿瘤分级最高的前列腺癌患者的生存率因分级组成而异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验